The camera has just evidenced it.
If the person in question hadn’t photographed it, and instead just wrote on twitter what it said, would that have been any different?
I know people are saying it won’t have any affect on the game but they are talking about exploiting the space left by the attackers not tracking back. I imagine this will affect how they set up now. Nothing we can do now but it’s not ideal. Be interesting to see what Robins says about it all.
I'm calling it...
Deliberate double bluff. MR and DA playing 4D chess here. Plant the story. Throw Watford off. Genius.
Deliberate double bluff. MR and DA playing 4D chess here. Plant the story. Throw Watford off. Genius.
absolutely. Hoedt to be benched as a result which ronins secretly wanted. It’s absolutely genius
What legal action could he take ? He should think about what he wrote and he's given Watford a motivational Leo talk already.
The person that took the photo deserves some come.back. Clear intention to pry and record personal data. The city employee that sent the message needs to get his act together.
The club seems to be weak on data protection and confidentiality. They do of course ‘leak’ info themselves.
Did he have his Cov jacket on? Fair play to the person who took the pic for realising who he is
Distribution of private data should be quite straightforward TBF. The evidence is all over Twitter.
"Dean was right....... Hoedt is shite"
"Dean was right....... Hoedt is shite"
"Dean was right....... Hoedt is shite"
If we're winning, obvs. Dont go to early with this one.
"Dean was right....... Hoedt is shite"
"Dean was right....... Hoedt is shite"
If we're winning, obvs. Dont go to early with this one.
Someone’s private messages.
Would you be OK if Nick leaked all that Tim Fisher erotica you send on here?
It absolutely is. It’s data linked to a named individual containing information about them.
Having been on about a billion GDPR courses the fact it is linked to an name that makes it possible to identify the person makes it private data.
No, no it wouldn't and newspaper articles still have to weigh the privacy rights of an individual vs. the public interest aspect.
Speedies_chips needs to go on one of those courses. It’s fairly straightforward stuff. Even numbers / nicknames are data. Pictures may be or inference to who they concern is all relevant.
Looking at something on display in public is not prying.
I don't now but I've done it in the past...I used to feel pressured into responding to people within a certain timeframe, particularly knowing they knew I had seen the message. Turning it off while I had that mindset was actually quite a relief.
Sent from my SM-A346B using Tapatalk
