Some of our fans dont have a clue (1 Viewer)

sperrin07

New Member
Sep 11, 2012
64
3
8
Sat in a different seat for yesterdays game and from minute one when the bloke behind me was calling nouble odelusi i knew i had an idiot behind me. He proceeded to say he would get rid of the lot of our squad and keep willis nouble and stokes. Stokes and willis are so average and nouble for me is lazy, selfish and can't finish. Then he started saying samuel was rubbish and hes glad he went back to reading.

The one that baffled me most was his constant abuse aimed at reda! He was dominant all game and apart from losing his footing and putting it out for a corner he didnt put a foot wrong. He's actually out biggest goal threat aswell as our biggest presence at the back. He did miss a couple of tackles but its his first game back. I know hes always injured but when he plays he changes the whole team. Willis pennington and stokes all looked more gutsy yesterday following redas example.

Funny everytime he won a header or did anything good the bloke was silent, one missed tackle and he was going mental!
 

skybluebeduff

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2011
5,704
1,831
163
Beduff
It's called an opinion, and everyone has their own.

Stokes had a brilliant game yesterday, yet you call him average?

See, difference in opinions.
 

skybluedan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2010
3,288
1,486
163
jersey (right on the beach)
If we all thought the same we would not have a forum mate, as duff said its all about your own views i hate beans with mash but like them with jacket spuds
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
Jan 24, 2011
12,328
6,907
313
Malvern
If we all thought the same we would not have a forum mate, as duff said its all about your own views i hate beans with mash but like them with jacket spuds

Mash is far superior to jacket spud! (just my opinion!) :slap:
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2011
78,309
43,064
813
It's called an opinion, and everyone has their own.

Stokes had a brilliant game yesterday, yet you call him average?

See, difference in opinions.


Wouldn't say Stokes was brilliant. He was excellent going forwards, but got skinned a couple of times down his flank in defence.

Much better going forwards yesterday than he was in defending.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2011
31,164
9,835
313
Wouldn't say Stokes was brilliant. He was excellent going forwards, but got skinned a couple of times down his flank in defence.

Much better going forwards yesterday than he was in defending.

Agreed. There were no brilliant performances yesterday.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

johnwillomagic

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
1,871
489
133
I thought Stokes pushed Reda close for mom yesterday as I have already pointed out I think some have a Vendetta against Stokes seeing some peoples marks.
for me he was certainly one of our better players yesterday.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
82,403
36,747
813
I thought Stokes pushed Reda close for mom yesterday as I have already pointed out I think some have a Vendetta against Stokes seeing some peoples marks.
for me he was certainly one of our better players yesterday.

Stokes played as well as anyone yesterday.

To say he got skinned is silly - he got beaten twice by the forward in 90 minutes.

It's the equivalent of saying a centre half gets skinned if he loses an areal battle or a forward gets behind him. It's impossible not to in 90 minutes.

Whatever anyone says about Stokes he's been a lot better than Haynes. Thank God he's out the squad - we've been carrying him all season.
 

WillieStanley

New Member
Aug 28, 2011
2,826
4
36
Stokes played as well as anyone yesterday.

To say he got skinned is silly - he got beaten twice by the forward in 90 minutes.

It's the equivalent of saying a centre half gets skinned if he loses an areal battle or a forward gets behind him. It's impossible not to in 90 minutes.

Whatever anyone says about Stokes he's been a lot better than Haynes. Thank God he's out the squad - we've been carrying him all season.

Whatever happened to Haynes. At the beginning of the season he looked like such a bright prospect, right up until, I seem to remember Mr Pressley saying something like "I'm not making any comparisons, but Gareth Bale started in his position".

All went south from there!!
 

skybluedan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2010
3,288
1,486
163
jersey (right on the beach)
Whatever happened to Haynes. At the beginning of the season he looked like such a bright prospect, right up until, I seem to remember Mr Pressley saying something like "I'm not making any comparisons, but Gareth Bale started in his position".

All went south from there!!

I thought he said Gareth hale.....
 

johnwillomagic

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
1,871
489
133
TBF I do not think Haynes is bad but Stokes is better currently - Haynes still has time on side and is good back up t have - a lot of people went
OTT about him at start of season but he did look good in patches too.
 

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2011
2,678
515
163
One of Stokes skinnings was down at the corner flag, the colchester playing was stationary but sold stokes a dummy and he was bearing down on the box, it was very poor defending, he doesn't look good enough as a defender and although he set the goal up yesterday he is like Aaron Martin / Webster always got a few errors per game in them that recently have lead to goals. Don't think we should keep him.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
82,403
36,747
813
One of Stokes skinnings was down at the corner flag, the colchester playing was stationary but sold stokes a dummy and he was bearing down on the box, it was very poor defending, he doesn't look good enough as a defender and although he set the goal up yesterday he is like Aaron Martin / Webster always got a few errors per game in them that recently have lead to goals. Don't think we should keep him.

His defending is vastly superior to that of Haynes.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2011
3,444
372
83
Coventry
Stokes played as well as anyone yesterday.

To say he got skinned is silly - he got beaten twice by the forward in 90 minutes.

It's the equivalent of saying a centre half gets skinned if he loses an areal battle or a forward gets behind him. It's impossible not to in 90 minutes.

Whatever anyone says about Stokes he's been a lot better than Haynes. Thank God he's out the squad - we've been carrying him all season.


I would agree with all you say except the Haynes bit , he is a young lad who should under normal circumstances have been played a few games and left out when he faded

But this sisu run team have to rely on kids to take a mans place
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
82,403
36,747
813
I would agree with all you say except the Haynes bit , he is a young lad who should under normal circumstances have been played a few games and left out when he faded

But this sisu run team have to rely on kids to take a mans place

Young players do play regularly at this level - it's the let him off he's one of us mentality that annoys me.
 

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2011
2,678
515
163
Whether he is better than Haynes who is still a teenager is a separate debate the manner by which he was skinned was alarming, in a game where Colchester offered very little especially in the first half there was limited defending required but he failed and we were lucky not to concede. I don't want stokes, webster or Martin here next season make too many mistakes.
 

Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
Whether he is better than Haynes who is still a teenager is a separate debate the manner by which he was skinned was alarming, in a game where Colchester offered very little especially in the first half there was limited defending required but he failed and we were lucky not to concede. I don't want stokes, webster or Martin here next season make too many mistakes.
Did you see Johnson get skinned when he had to handball it?
 

johnniericoh

Member
Mar 11, 2011
1,348
10
38
Coventry
Wouldn't say Stokes was brilliant. He was excellent going forwards, but got skinned a couple of times down his flank in defence.

Much better going forwards yesterday than he was in defending.

I have always considered that this position, so called "Wing Back" difficult to fulfill because it is in reality 2 jobs, defending and attacking of which Stokes played superbly last Saturday needing boundless stamina and positional awareness.

Surely you can't expect 100% cover both ends of the pitch whilst bombing up and down the flank for 90 minutes.

Even seasoned internationals find this role difficult so I think certain allowances need to be considered before critical judgement can be made.
 

LB87ccfc

Member
Dec 28, 2012
2,344
18
38
Wouldn't say Stokes was brilliant. He was excellent going forwards, but got skinned a couple of times down his flank in defence.

Much better going forwards yesterday than he was in defending.

Just like every game he has played then
 

Users who are viewing this thread