Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Limited Being Wound Up? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Looks like they’ll be some more reading on TuesdayNO - read the opening line
It says it withdraws the previous statement regarding ... not completed reasonable steps etc.
It has not withdrawn the statement relating to SISU
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
That was just osb's opinion.
Till the CT reported it was not certain, though maybe highly probable, because nothing was on the companies house website except the strike off notice, in fact it is still there.
Till the CT reported it was not certain, though maybe highly probable, because nothing was on the companies house website except the strike off notice, in fact it is still there.
Nick
Administrator
Seems a very backward way to do it?
What they will be reading is the original notice which should be followed by a notice of withdrawal
It takes ages for CH to catch up at times
Them's the rules
It used to be possible just to amend the next CS but that changed last year
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Don’t worry. SISU are coming under scrutiny and it’s drawn some criticism. You know how that stresses Nick out. He’ll be OK once he’s ran a hot bath, lit some scented candles and put a recording of whale song on.
And don't you worry ACL / WASPs are not being overlooked
Proof of that is the requirement to have to change the Bond rules
Nick
Administrator
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
So who else has been registered as a person of significant control in the past and not been withdrawn? Clearly someone has been withdrawn as it says in the box in the top right corner. If not SISU then who? Also if it’s not withdrawing the statement relating to SISU why does it say and I quote “the company has not yet completed taking reasonable steps to find out”? That’s hardly confirming the PSC02 filled earlier is it? In fact that statement alone cancels out any PSC02 ever posted wouldn’t it otherwise the company wouldn’t need to be taking “reasonable steps” because they’d already know? Unless you can explain otherwise of course? I’m all ears.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
So? Post it on the wasps sub forum if you’re that concerned. This thread is about SBS&L. Why are you attempting to take it off topic? What’s in it for you?
Nick
Administrator
That's why I thought what he was saying was backward.
I "think" the way he is saying is that the statement was:
"The company has not yet completed...."
Now they are saying that statement isn't true any more, so it's withdrawn.
That's why I thought it was backwards and didn't make much sense.
What it all means though, no idea...
I "think" the way he is saying is that the statement was:
"The company has not yet completed...."
Now they are saying that statement isn't true any more, so it's withdrawn.
That's why I thought it was backwards and didn't make much sense.
What it all means though, no idea...
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Available to read on Tuesday apparently if I’ve read companies house correctly.
Read the line above and my note. It says THAT statement is being withdrawn not the SISU notice
Also if it’s not withdrawing the statement relating to SISU why does it say and I quote “the company has not yet completed taking reasonable steps to find out”?
That's why I thought what he was saying was backward.
I "think" the way he is saying is that the statement was:
"The company has not yet completed...."
Now they are saying that statement isn't true any more, so it's withdrawn.
That's why I thought it was backwards and didn't make much sense.
What it all means though, no idea...
It means , previously that could not confirm who was the controlling entity so that posted that statement
Now they feel they can, so the old statement is withdrawn and the new one uploaded
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
But till they post a new confirmation statement the question is still unanswered is it not?
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the clarification Les
No
First statement withdrawn
New statement on file - that is that
Come next year - assuming no changes - they will tick the box and pay £13 end
I had a cousin Les who died very early and an Uncle Les but he also died so neither of them can answer you
Does that make OSB - Simon or his successor ?
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Yes
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
When can we expect that then? Will it still be SISU? If it is why was there a need to post the withdrawal? Was the withdrawal an error? Is it down to incompetence? Seems like they’d just be doing the same job twice if it is, hardly a sign of an entity with a grip on things is it?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Sorry begging your pudding, I meant the 'person with significant control' statement which was withdrawn leaving that question unanswered, though we sort of know it is Joy.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
On this occasion are you sure it will cancel out the previous statement? Only where the PSC is concerned you seemed eager to point out that the withdrawal didn’t cancel out the previous statement.
Nick
Administrator
From what I think he is saying, they have withdrawn the statement, the statement was this:
"The company has not yet completed...."
So they just withdrew the statement.
I have no idea if it's true, but could they have submitted this:
"Notification of Sisu Capital Limited as a person with significant control"
It then rendered the statement out of date as they had done that, so they withdrew the statement?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Will we know who the PSC is though?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Out of date during the course of an afternoon though? Sounds more like filed in error to me.
Nick
Administrator
The way I am reading it there was a statement outstanding below at the bottom:
They then did this:
So as they had just done that, the statement wasn't true any more so they then withdrew the statement?
Nick
Administrator
Isn't that this?
that's just the way I am reading it, which is why I replied saying it looks a bit backwards...
Nonleagueherewecome
Well-Known Member
I do love a poster who only surfaces when SISU need defending. Still, it's a living, eh? I see that Godiva is viewing the thread too!
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
If you read the filling history page on beta companies it has the PSC02 under date of 17 Jan 2018, under description it states “Notification of SISU Capital Limited as a person with significant control on 6 April 2016”. The withdrawal was posted on the same date but the description says “Withdrawal of a person with a significant control statement on 17 January 2018”. So how can it refer to anything other than the only PSC statement posted on the date referenced? That date being 17 Jan 2018. Seems that the description is date specific to me so can only refer to one thing.
Nick
Administrator
Is it not referring to the statement at the bottom of that because it was no longer valid after they had done the other one that day?
On 14 Nov 2016 they made the statement "the company has not yet completed taking reasonable etc etc ..." However when they apparently completed and took those steps, they withdrew the statement from November?
No idea if right or not, not an accounts expert but just looking at wording of it.
IE.
I make a statement saying Tony's favourite drink is Fizzy Pineapple off the pop man
I then find out Tony likes Tab Clear more, so I then withdraw the above statement and show Tony holding his Tab clear.
Does sound backwards but that's the impression I got.
