I wouldn't , we've moved on and are recruiting better than at this stage last season . Panzo was ultimately a bad loan and didn't really offer anything for the second half of the season
Superb maybe a bit strong but he was good yesSuperb ?
Our upturn in form coincided with him being dropped for better technical players in Doyle and McNally
I hope we avoid getting him back
he was really good at times as well
just because because our young player of the year was better doesn't mean he wasn't good
Did you watch him on that great run we had pre World Cup!
he’s a good player and has just as much potential as McNally to make it at the top level in my opinion
I think if we're getting another lcb it needs to be a more experienced player as when Fadz is out our back line is very young
He was in the side in the first upturn in form.Superb ?
Our upturn in form coincided with him being dropped for better technical players in Doyle and McNally
I hope we avoid getting him back
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?
He was athletic and physical but technically inept , improving that is difficult in the short term
Technically inept? Im sorry I disagree with that
was constantly bringing the ball forward
No I definitely wouldn't as he is superb but without Fadz and Bidwell our back 5 would have an average age of 22/23
Im saying I would take him , you asked if I would be opposed to it and I said I definitely wouldn't be
Please read the replies
Yes I read themIm saying I would take him , you asked if I would be opposed to it and I said I definitely wouldn't be
Please read the replies
you said you wanted experience ie no Panzo but you want humphries so you’ve contradicted yourself
I’m sorry that run we had pre World Cup Panzo was very good
I think people's perspective of Panzo is poisoned by a recency bias, particularly after what happened in the play-off final. He wasn't actually a bad player, he just fell out of form and was probably lacking in confidence after being displaced by Callum Doyle (who was class) in the latter half of the season. Realistically, as a left-footed CB around the age of 22-23, he currently fits our model of recruitment, and I think people have written him off far too soon. There's no doubt a decent player there imo. Definitely wouldn't mind having him back, especially for some much needed squad depth in the defensive department.
Alternatively, I also wouldn't mind taking a punt at Humphreys who would seem to offer some potentially similar qualities minus the trauma attached to Panzo due to that play-off incident
Alternatively, I also wouldn't mind taking a punt at Humphreys who would seem to offer some potentially similar qualities minus the trauma attached to Panzo due to that play-off incident
No you asked if I would take Humphries after I stated I would prefer an experienced player
I would absolutely take Humphries but worry about the age and experience of our back line without another older head
Please read the replies
Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi tooNo you asked if I would take Humphries after I stated I would prefer an experienced player
I would absolutely take Humphries but worry about the age and experience of our back line without another older head
Please read the replies
also in the play-off final if the Luton doesn't slam dunk the ball he's flicked over him and everything is fine
especially with all the new players we have.. getting someone in who knows the system and staff is almost priceless
So you would have played Panzo in the playoff final ?The other centre backs were really good that day remember David
Not necessarily, said a loan deal to rangers collapsed but nothing else
if it’s another loan I wouldn’t mind exploring another option admittedly but I’d definitely have him back
