Kitching (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter zuni
- Start date
Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
Yes
fatso
Well-Known Member
Coventry City 2-0 Sheffield Wednesday | Championship highlights
Watch highlights of the Sky Bet Championship match between Coventry City and Sheffield Wednesday.
www.skysports.com
You can just see Kitching getting mugged in the last couple of seconds.
They have to have this looked at again. I'm sure it will get overturned.
Blind-Faith
Well-Known Member
The SW player tried to nut him before the ref even blew the whistle, then tried again after the FT whistle. Kitching must of said something to wind him up, love it 
SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
Can’t really judge it off the video provided as so much of it is off camera. Hopefully there are more angles available because if not I can’t see it getting overturned.
Probably told him that (a) Wednesday were shit and (b) they are going down.The SW player tried to nut him before the ref even blew the whistle, then tried again after the FT whistle. Kitching must of said something to wind him up, love it
skyblueelephant76
Well-Known Member
SleepyGinger
Well-Known Member
Both would have been at Barnsley together, can’t see it getting overturned fwiw. Binks, Lati or Fadz to replace him?
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Binks obviously
Binks I would have thought although it would be difficult to leave Latibeaudiere out of the side after today's performance. I guess it might depend in how fit Sheaf is. Can't see McFadzean in a back four.
Dickie
Well-Known Member
Camera angels? Very Christmassy.
Dickie
Well-Known Member
I think Kitching was at Barnsley after Diaby left, but I’d go Binks and leave Lati in midfield
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Whole reason we've played a back five for the past couple of seasons is that Fadz legs have gone . Still been a magnificent servant for us and one I hope makes his way onto the coaching team , but the thought of him in a back four is not a good one
Astute
Well-Known Member
How many versions would you like
oscillatewildly
Well-Known Member
Absolutely zero evidence from this clip (apart from two sublime finishes) of anything.
I sit in the North stand and I turned around at the final whistle to chat with a bloke behind me so missed the initial immediate shenanigans - Only to witness the post incident grapple death match.
Apparently their bloke stuck the head on Kitch and Kitch reacted in a less than red card manner.
Given the fact that Shef W are sub zero bottom feeder opposition (I do believe this is a fact) those 3 pts won set off against a 3 game loss of a critical first team selection player makes this result (potentially) feel more like a draw.
I sit in the North stand and I turned around at the final whistle to chat with a bloke behind me so missed the initial immediate shenanigans - Only to witness the post incident grapple death match.
Apparently their bloke stuck the head on Kitch and Kitch reacted in a less than red card manner.
Given the fact that Shef W are sub zero bottom feeder opposition (I do believe this is a fact) those 3 pts won set off against a 3 game loss of a critical first team selection player makes this result (potentially) feel more like a draw.
See Robins post match interview
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
The club has non broadcast cameras there for tactical recordings and 1 of them likely picked it up
The off camera bit is on mattsb on youtube.
Nick
Administrator
Got a link?
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Sorry mate just thought I’d post as that’s his you tube
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
the cut out most of it so they can back to them dribble on
great
great
Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
He looked ready to nut his own players early in the first hslf (Eccles deflected shot?)
JohnWH
Well-Known Member
What does actual appeal process look like? Genuine question, due to ignorance.
Doesn't matter what (if anything) anyone else may or may not have seen. Is an appeals based solely on a match official's report or is there room and procedure to allow and introduce additional evidence such as alternative video, testimony, etc. Like many, I only got a half view and filling in rest with speculation. Is there a committee board, etc.
Doesn't matter what (if anything) anyone else may or may not have seen. Is an appeals based solely on a match official's report or is there room and procedure to allow and introduce additional evidence such as alternative video, testimony, etc. Like many, I only got a half view and filling in rest with speculation. Is there a committee board, etc.
slowpoke
Well-Known Member
I think Kitching will be unlucky, it looks nothing more than a couple of defensive shoves but I think the FA will just back the ref as Kitching did put his hands on a player.
I hope I’m wrong
Not sure of the rules now but is it still if you appeal but fail an extra game is added to the ban which would make it a 4 match ban.
His three game ban would cover Swansea, Middlesbrough & the Oxford cup-tie a fourth would include Leicester.
I hope I’m wrong
Not sure of the rules now but is it still if you appeal but fail an extra game is added to the ban which would make it a 4 match ban.
His three game ban would cover Swansea, Middlesbrough & the Oxford cup-tie a fourth would include Leicester.
long way home
Well-Known Member
The club will be looking on what film they have then decide if its good evidence to show to get it reversed. The interview Robins suggested the ref didn't see the start of it and thinks that could help Kitching.
But once dust has settled and they are back they may decide to move on and work towards playing without Kitching due to restrictions in time to get answers.
But once dust has settled and they are back they may decide to move on and work towards playing without Kitching due to restrictions in time to get answers.
