Just put this on YouTube. Timmy estimating the Sixfields attendances (June 2013). (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Houchens Head
- Start date
I remember sitting in that very forum getting frustrated that he wasn't listening to what we were saying. He was just going through the motions. Utter pri*k
(Apologies for slight emphasis editing!)
As low as 3,000 eh Tim? That's worrying!
No he said as low as three, So nearly there then Timmy
sad thing is crowd of 2000 + cup match v arsenal = revenue of a crowd of 6000 and no cup revenue
I was there also, if you listen yo Sandra Garlick, they talk in exactly the same way.
I won't hear Sandra Garlick speak. I'm not even entertaining them any longer. They are jokers the lot of them.
The man is just a prick. He acts really intelligent but he hasn't got a clue. He was around 5,000 fans out. That's a huge error when you think about it.
Football isnt a normal commodity / product Tim, and its demand cant be estimated according to some ecenomic supply and demand theory you learnt from a text book at Uni....its wrapped up in peoples heritage, loyalty to that heritage and tradition...then and only then comes the entertainment factor...otherwise none of us would have been a City fan for all these years.
The crowd reaction is quality. We've been in play off form and almost every match has been below his lowest estimate.
(Apologies for slight emphasis editing!)
As low as 3,000 eh Tim? That's worrying!
That was his best joke of the entire evening, had me laughing out loud.
Don't they!? I noticed that.
I think the time has come for that "polished" politicians performance. People take the piss now. Time for the media training schools to refresh their materials I think.
Cmon nothing beats him actually saying "if you build it they will come" completely deadpan.
Ha Ha hilarious! What a turkey necked tosser he is.. He seems to have stepped out of the limelight of late to save himself yet more embarassment and ridicule, restricted to merely Programme notes. The baton has been passed to Labovitch whos is equally as laughable!
A projection or forecast as wrong as that would have every other CEO in the country clearing their desks by now. Add to that, the farce with regards predictions with regards the stadiums, land or locations, and whilst I can see the funny side, this appears incompetence of epic proportions. I read GMK at the weekend, and one significant poster drew a distinction between the old SISU, pre-Fisher; and the improved iteration since. Am I missing something?
I agree, sbpm2. To me, TF comes across as a blustering buffoon, whereas ML is more 'little boy lost' who is out of his depth. As a double act, they would be similar to Laurel & Hardy.
