Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
I was just watching then, their defender all over Wright with the lino in line. As soon as wright grabbed his shirt back the lino was talking to the ref on his ear piece.

Something has to be done about the inconsistency.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2011
15,826
8,268
313
Coventry
So so bad.

Ironically the one we laughed about for the goal was actually a great decision. Angle showed the ball was still in play.
 

messiahrobins

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2024
959
641
93
I was just watching then, their defender all over Wright with the lino in line. As soon as wright grabbed his shirt back the lino was talking to the ref on his ear piece.

Something has to be done about the inconsistency.
Its corruption and lack of integrity. I knew we would get a penalty against us today and i will bet that was down to the fact we have embarrassed the FA on Sunday.
That penalty tonight was indefensible as he wasnt close to being fouled in the box, people need to wake up and stop excusing these dodgy decisions as jut being incompetent and inconsistent.
I totally support the approach of the guy at Nottingham Forest who has done the same stuff in Greece. He gets it.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2018
4,538
3,092
163
Haven’t seen anything back and often in the cold light of day watching a replay I tend to have more sympathy with the ref than I do at the game (not to say there hasn’t been some shocking decisions this season and overall standard poor) but the ref had very little interest in controlling the Hull players and only reluctantly showed a yellow when he had no option. They played him like a fiddle all evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: It’sabatch87

jim20

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2011
466
344
163
I’m more annoyed about the head injury, even if it wasn’t, if a player goes down with potential head injury these days the game should be stopped immediately.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
35,284
19,033
313
I’m more annoyed about the head injury, even if it wasn’t, if a player goes down with potential head injury these days the game should be stopped immediately.
The law changed its serious injury not head injury
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2015
18,985
9,483
313
The law changed its serious injury not head injury
When?

The treatment of injuries guidance on the FA website says

"Play is stopped if, in their opinion, a player is seriously injured or receives a head injury"
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
May 13, 2013
13,236
6,328
313
Coventry
I’m more annoyed about the head injury, even if it wasn’t, if a player goes down with potential head injury these days the game should be stopped immediately.

The problem was Thomas put his hands to his head ran a bit then went down. I think ref thought he was just doing it to stop an attack. He ignored a few Hull players that lay on pitch like they had been shot.

Ref on Sunday ignored a few instances when Manchester United players lay on the pitch.

I'm all for it play on. It wasn't like he had been knocked out. I was pretty close to it and there didn't seem much in it to me.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2015
18,985
9,483
313
The problem was Thomas put his hands to his head ran a bit then went down. I think ref thought he was just doing it to stop an attack. He ignored a few Hull players that lay on pitch like they had been shot.

Ref on Sunday ignored a few instances when Manchester United players lay on the pitch.

I'm all for it play on. It wasn't like he had been knocked out. I was pretty close to it and there didn't seem much in it to me.
Why should the ref think that? If the ref thinks that then he needs to be banned from reffing.

Even in serious head injuries there can be a delayed reaction.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
May 13, 2013
13,236
6,328
313
Coventry
We should have took Thomas off for a head injury assessment then?

So our medical staff are just as bad.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2011
15,826
8,268
313
Coventry
It's the red card that's the issue.

You can argue the toss of the penalty but that foot is high and his stoods are showing. It's a very poor tackle. We need to wise up. If that was Kelly against a Hull player, they'd be on the floor rolling all over the place.
 

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2013
5,098
3,031
213
It's the red card that's the issue.

You can argue the toss of the penalty but that foot is high and his stoods are showing. It's a very poor tackle. We need to wise up. If that was Kelly against a Hull player, they'd be on the floor rolling all over the place.
Who was their player who put that challenge on Kelly?
 

Hertsccfc

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
5,925
5,650
263
Terrible ref again but for balance we should not have had the free kick for Palmer’s goal.
 

napolimp

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2014
2,528
2,362
163
Thought the ref was OK last night. Let a lot of robust challenges go from us, which I like to see, even with Hull players rolling about on the deck milking it. Penalty was probably correct decision, if not borderline - still better than VAR spending 2 minutes deciding if the challenge was a cm one way or the other. Carded the Hull players for the unnecessary celebrations. We pretty much shot ourselves in the foot with 2 completely avoidable mistakes, and a poor attempt at a challenge on the edge of the area. We had to work a lot harder for our goals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shmmeee

ccfcricoh

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2011
1,266
1,114
213
tbf to the ref - Thomas didnt commit to going down, he was on his knee for a bit, then stood up, then saw them breaking and went back down again...

however annoying, it wasnt an injury that the game needed stopping for

Having said that, the ref was more than happy to stop the game for their antics more than once when none of them were remotely head injuries
 

Skyblue Bangkok

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2023
587
363
113
Bangkok
I
Thought the ref was OK last night. Let a lot of robust challenges go from us, which I like to see, even with Hull players rolling about on the deck milking it. Penalty was probably correct decision, if not borderline - still better than VAR spending 2 minutes deciding if the challenge was a cm one way or the other. Carded the Hull players for the unnecessary celebrations. We pretty much shot ourselves in the foot with 2 completely avoidable mistakes, and a poor attempt at a challenge on the edge of the area. We had to work a lot harder for our goals.
I just saw the highlights it looks like for our 2 Nd goal the ball was out of play just before we scored .
 

Tomh111

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2012
766
880
143
Cirencester
I have a friend who is currently doing his refereeing qualification etc - he can referee up to National League South at the minute.

Apparently, the referee last night is known for being shit, but is employed full time, and so they can't do anything with him.



Sent from my SM-S911B using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2015
18,985
9,483
313
tbf to the ref - Thomas didnt commit to going down, he was on his knee for a bit, then stood up, then saw them breaking and went back down again...

however annoying, it wasnt an injury that the game needed stopping for

Having said that, the ref was more than happy to stop the game for their antics more than once when none of them were remotely head injuries
not all head injuries put you flat on your back, also where does it say in the laws that as well?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Users who are viewing this thread