Sheppey United (who are they?) beating Walsall 1-0. Game on ITV4
Solihull with a big game away at Bolton tomorrow
Solihull with a big game away at Bolton tomorrow
Horsham (seventh tier) beating Barnsley at Oakwell. We’ll be in the for the rest of their squad in January
Yeah but we got to get Styles in. He's a top class player and the answer to all our midfield woes. If only we'd spent millions on him during the window.
Crewe 1-0 Derby at HT, Derby have had all the possession, all the chances, not taken them and one great cross from the Crewe left back sets up a goal. Sounds familiar
Wouldn't be surprised to see Paul Warne back at Rotherham by the end of the year
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
CLUB STATEMENT | FA CHARGE
Today the FA has advised us that we will no longer be able to participate in the FA Cup this season.
www.barnsleyfc.co.uk
Not only are they thrown out but will lose the money for progressing to round 2 which this season is £41,000. Horsham will love that money.All because they played one of their players recalled from York before the replay.Costly mistake?
And they're a Yorkshire team - They'll feel that pain double maybe triple in the pocket. Bloody ouch!
Villa may well be side tracked with the possibility of a Lg finish good enough for CL football - That will undoubtedly mean fielding a weak side in the 2 or 3 rds they will be in.
Spurs will not be hindered by the same dilemma so yeah, Spurs for the cup is a decent shout.
Not long got back from the post office and filling the car - Put TV on for Alfreton v Walsall FA cup game. Alfreton's manager talking up the conditions in the pre match interview. Put the kettle on then went for a crap - Walked back into the living room and the game's been postponed 
Literally minutes before KO.
Literally minutes before KO.
Barnsley were kicked out for playing for playing a player in thier replay who was not registered to play in the first game.(rule 103)Forest Green played a player on loan without written permission from his club.( rule 109) They are not being kicked out but will replay their game.Both teams broke the rules but 1 replays the game (with the extra cash that brings) the other is chucked out.The crime seems much the same to me
One didn’t ask permission from the parent club but the player was otherwise eligible. The other was the parent club but fielded someone ineligible to play.
Both players were ineligible Barnsley because they fielded a player recalled in the replay whom was not registered to play in the first game(rule103).The Forest Green player played without written permission from the parent club(rule 109.1). That is my understanding in both statements from the FA it states both player were ineligible so therefore both should be expelled
The Forest Green player was eligible (given permission by the parent club) but they didn’t inform the FA.
The version I read was wriiten permission was not given to the FA didn't say by whom.Thanks.
I read that it's more to do with policing than anything else, although I'm sure TV companies weren't complaining.
League fixtures are arranged so a limited number of London clubs host matches on the same day but the FA Cup third round has drawn 10 capital clubs at home: AFC Wimbledon, Arsenal, Brentford, Chelsea, Crystal Palace (last night), Fulham, Millwall, Queens Park Rangers, Tottenham Hotspur and West Ham United.
It has prompted lengthy negotiations between the Football Association and the Metropolitan Police, and a concerted effort to spread the fixtures across the weekend.
BBC obsessed with showing two premier league teams as if people are desperate to see it
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I had hoped that these teams would want to avoid a replay enough to be a bit adventurous.
As I write that, good goal
There's not many standout ties but thought Gillingham Vs Sheff Utd and Stoke Vs Brighton were in for a shout as potential cupsets
Spurs Vs Burnley was a borefest though!
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
