You do wonder if these people have a brain cell at times. It's not too difficult to work out that not giving CCFC £300 affects CCFC, not SISU.
Yeah but the council pr has made people think the money goes to sisu.
That bloke also doesn't realise the majority of ifollow money goes to the club too.
Boycotting St Andrews will achieve something, it will destroy all the good work that Robins has achieved .Sisu won't fund us ,if we don't ,player sales will.
I think there is a difference between a boycott and simply not going for other reasons.
They willfuly broke a legally binding rental agreement, in an attempt to financially distress another company for starters!
It’s amazing how short some people’s memories are!
People really need to learn to divorce CCFC with SISU. They are not the same entity.
You are not bankrupting SISU by not atenning games. You are bankrupting CCFC. Is that what you want?
Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
You are not bankrupting SISU by not atenning games. You are bankrupting CCFC. Is that what you want?
Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
Why is your bottom sentence any different to what CCC (ACL) and Wasps were doing/going to do?
Why is it fine for them to do it but not OK if SISU do it?
Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
Phil Upton read out my text yesterday afternoon which questioned why Eakin didn't read anything from the SISU statement which stated that they had wanted a 5 year deal (W*sps didn't), and that W*sps wanted to be indemnified against future costs arising from legal action, when SISU had given an undertaking that they had ceased direct legal action.
All well and good - but he DIDN'T read the part where i said that SBTrust and JHWay do not represent the rank and file fans (having just had Moz and Johnson spouting their usual drivel).
All well and good - but he DIDN'T read the part where i said that SBTrust and JHWay do not represent the rank and file fans (having just had Moz and Johnson spouting their usual drivel).
Oh no they won't upset them.
It's the same as Linnell sharing exec boxes with Hoffman who had just congratulated Johnson for holding up a banner as a "protest".
So it's fine for us to be 10 years away? What about 15, or 20?
I understand your point of course, but if Sisu are comfortable with us being at Birmingham and there is no written in stone compulsory return date, there is no pressure whatsoever on Sisu to do anything other than just keep playing in Birmingham, or elsewhere.
It's ok Otis, we are all going to live forever and footie mad 5 year olds are all going to wait until they're 10 to choose a team to follow.
‘They’ broke that by liquidating the company. Ergo the company didn’t exist any more and the lease agreement died with it.
I have never had time for SISU and was all for boycotting Northampton. The St Andrews situation is slightly different. I will not be attending regularly but will go. Some fans will go some wont and I can understand both sided....I think a lot will depend on form and how the team is doing.
I should hope not, I’ve only just come off.
And that causes them to fail the fit and proper persons test how exactly? I'm talking about the actual test used by the EFL not whatever version you have made up for yourself.
Out of interest what do you think would happen if the EFL forcibly removed SISU? Happy to take the risk that the club ceases to exist if no new owner comes forward?
I'd be interested to know how. If boycotting will get the club back in Coventry I'll happily boycott.
I will ifollow and try to get to a few games. No odea how to get there from new street ststion though
If you can explain how this would work and why it would make SISU agree to indemnify any potential losses from a EC investigation, then I’m all ears.
I don't see this being short term but realistically what do you expect to happen if a 5 year limit is put in place?
If Wasps continue to say we can't play at the Ricoh are you suggesting the club is given 5 years and then wound up?
