fatso
Well-Known Member
So do I, that doesn't mean it's going to happen.
Transfer Rumour Billy Sharp (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Ian1779
- Start date
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
He made 37 appearances last season for a team that won automatic promotion by 11 clear points, those stats would suggest he played a vital role in getting his club promoted.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
I'm hearing this is done,deal. Can't say I overly enthusiastic about it if true.
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Billy Sharp or Walker/Waghorn ?
I agree it’s not one for the future but for a season it makes sense
SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t mind it if he’s coming into it knowing he won’t play much and wants to help be a mentor to Simms/younger squad players. Don’t think it’s a particularly good deal as a replacement for Godden though.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
not you i would choose but as a 3rd 4th striker off the bench he'll be ok
Finham
Well-Known Member
Ideally better than all of those. I feel like we've wasted their wages on a has-been when it could have been re-invested in a younger player who we can improve. Not to mention that in reality, it's not Walker/Waghorn or Sharp, it's sounding like Godden or Sharp.
Telfer85
Well-Known Member
Maybe if we hadn’t been stung by waghorn we might not be so down on it. The guy played a hell of a lot of games last year in a promotion winning side so he’s coming from a different mindset to waghorn. His experience could be very useful to our younger crop.
Also every other club hates him and it’s about time we had someone like that. Put a bit of steel in the team can see him being a leader up top, Kelly in the middle and fadz at the back. 3 solid experienced players down the spine even if not playing every week.
Either way if he’s coming I’ll back him I just worry fans will be so quick to get on his back and he has potential to be a disruptive influence. He doesn’t hold back his opinions.
Also every other club hates him and it’s about time we had someone like that. Put a bit of steel in the team can see him being a leader up top, Kelly in the middle and fadz at the back. 3 solid experienced players down the spine even if not playing every week.
Either way if he’s coming I’ll back him I just worry fans will be so quick to get on his back and he has potential to be a disruptive influence. He doesn’t hold back his opinions.
alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
I seem to remember him being quite critical of us after the game we played against them and everybody protested - Sheff U took that whole thing quite personally
alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
I am not against it tbh, he isn’t going to be expected our main source of goals - Worth chucking on when we need a goal in the last 20 mins or a bit of experience to see out a 1-0 lead
Martin180
Well-Known Member
I hope it isn’t as I think Godden still has something to offer but if we can get a decent fee and sign another young striker then it’s what we must do . Would love a young loanee as well Diallo would be incredible
Finham
Well-Known Member
Problem with someone his age is the risk of that "oh fuck, De Zeeuw" moment happening. And I think it may have almost already. We have Fadz already in that zone.
Martin180
Well-Known Member
And , like Fadz , his experience helping Simms on the training ground would be massive . Is he still the alltime championship leading scorer ?
SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
How would people feel if our forward options next season were Simms, Sharp, Vente and Whittaker?
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Think we have to trust the process . Sharp does have an incredible record
long way home
Well-Known Member
This will be a signing that makes no sense to me, not even his experience would justify the wages we would have to spend on him. Id prefer to put his money in a younger signing or a loan player that has much more to prove.
Last edited:
larry_david
Well-Known Member
MR and Co know whay they are doing. If it's a one year deal and he's a bench option plus adds a bit of nous and experience, then I trust the process.
Not every signing can be a young up and comer
Not every signing can be a young up and comer
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Why can’t we have both if we cash in on Godden?
Finham
Well-Known Member
Nah fuck that mate, this is a minging signing if true IMO.
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
If we were to sign Sharp, the difference between this signing and say, Waghorn or a De Zeeuew/Kilbane is that Sharp isn’t being brought in to start games. He’s an experienced pro who can add leadership qualities and has proven his durability. A great mentor for Simms.
I don’t think it’s a choice between Sharp and Godden at all. Personally, I can see Godden being shipped on for a fee to support spending on younger targets. Sharp adds experience to a young side and balance is important.
I don’t think it’s a choice between Sharp and Godden at all. Personally, I can see Godden being shipped on for a fee to support spending on younger targets. Sharp adds experience to a young side and balance is important.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Be happy as Sharp would clearly be 4th choice. If that’s the case why not just keep Godden.
Darth Robins
Well-Known Member
If that kid doesn't write a song about him I'm not interested frankly.
Balli001
Well-Known Member
Because godden has a saleable value with a year left on his contract
Telfer85
Well-Known Member
Agreed would rather keep Godden…maybe they’ve had a really good offer for him that will help with other targets.
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Because we can get a fee for him . Look I’m a big Godden fan , think he’s been brilliant for us but some of the shit you read on here …
Two days ago he was not a great finisher , never fit , selfish , overrated according to some posters . Soon as we are going to replace him with Sharp he’s suddenly become the sky blue Pele
Balli001
Well-Known Member
We could potentially use the fee to help purchase mcnally or increase hamers contract offer
alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
Guaranteed to either score or be booked at Hillsborough in January, probably both
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Not really risky on a free is it. Would suggest Sakamoto is much more risky.
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Trust the trigger ?
Finham
Well-Known Member
Wages! Plus signing on fee. There's no such thing as a free transfer.
alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
He has just had a new house built in Sheff apparently - Rotherham is more convenient for him but if the money is better with us then who knows
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
If we can get a good fee for Godden, I’d take it because he’s in the last year of his contract and his injury record has been mixed last few season.
Likewise, we’re changing the way we play and from the games I’ve seen, it’s clear Godden doesn’t really fit in with our play style any more.
