That's my understanding too.
Also, it will inevitably draw attention to the whole Admin process that left much to be desired...
You are both missing the point.
Unless the CVA is sanctioned they cannot come out of administration. The Football League (for what they are worth) state that they will sanction the move to Northampton, but cannot do so till the club is out of administration. Hence forcing the games to revert back to the Ricoh.
You are both missing the point.
Unless the CVA is sanctioned they cannot come out of administration. The Football League (for what they are worth) state that they will sanction the move to Northampton, but cannot do so till the club is out of administration. Hence forcing the games to revert back to the Ricoh.
You are both missing the point.
Unless the CVA is sanctioned they cannot come out of administration. The Football League (for what they are worth) state that they will sanction the move to Northampton, but cannot do so till the club is out of administration. Hence forcing the games to revert back to the Ricoh.
Says who. we have already played at the Ricoh while in administration in a deal brokered by the administrator, this time it will cost nothing, what will have changed since thenWe will see who is proved right. The league agreed it so we can fulfil our fixtures so if no deal is struck with acl we will play at Northampton.
Does rejecting the cva definitely mean liquidation as suggested, I seem to remember this going or ages at Pompey, the weren't liquidated were they, maybe different circumstances. and does rejection meam Holdings automatically get the club and the Golden Share as Grendel suggests, not sure about that either
OK, so that ties in with the FL statement (if you can believe they aren't shitting themselves at being SISued) and ACL said they could play free while in admin, so it would be play at the Ricoh but with -15 points?
Like some others have said, no real chance of promotion - but would the 15 point deduction guarantee RELEGATION?
I would welcome this, if it meant SISU sell up. But is there any prospect of that?
so some are advocating not to sign, ACL condemn the sky blues to -15 points and risk of further relegation? As both are culpable why so much hate for SISU who are the football club not ACL?
There's something not right. Unfortunately we need to get to the bottom of this club's finances. Yep, it will hurt the team on the pitch, bit so too is the act of moving the club away from the fans.
It's got past the damage that can be done now I feel.
I want us to be seen to be doing the right thing and it is an issue of morals and codes and scruples.
To be quite honest I think there is a many a shady going's on throughout football in general. Time to put the house in order.
If people thought SISU had been telling the truth and....
if SISU treated the fans with some respect and....
if people believed SISU wanted the best for the football club and....
if SISU weren't taking us out of the City for 5 years (or permanently)
then maybe the ACL high rent factor would be a bigger issue. But until we sort out the SISU issues, reject the CVA and we'll deal with ACL afterwards. Otherwise it's like worrying about having pointy ears when you've got cancer:blue:
Well said Otis these scum need to be outed and the law deal with them
These type of people are the ruin of football along with sky
Not only their shareholders, but they also have a duty to the other stakeholders - like Compass, the casino and all the emplyees who very much depend on the customers the club brings around.
Refusing the CVA will make certain that the club goes to sixfields while signing the CVA will open the door for negotiation.
Refusing the CVA will allow for investigations of directors actions, but it will mainly be those preceding Fisher - i.e. fans hero Gary Hoffman!
I fail to see how any investigation will lead to sisu going away or the club being sold to another party.
Oh yes sir you certainly are the man of distraction. I do believe the investigation we want to see is between 2011 accounts with a 10 million turn over 108 employees to a non trading company within a matter of 12 months. I don't recall but Hoffman then present in 2012. I think not
And yet you portray that sisu have a duty to compass the casino , you are transparent with your posts , sisu could not give a s**t about the fans and they have never in their history given a s**t about another company.
The law deal with what? Are you telling us you know they broke the law? Where?
I do believe the investigation we want to see is between 2011 accounts with a 10 million turn over 108 employees to a non trading company within a matter of 12 months may very well be illegal
I do believe the investigation we want to see is between 2011 accounts with a 10 million turn over 108 employees to a non trading company within a matter of 12 months may very well be illegal
we want to see is between 2011 accounts with a 10 million turn over 108 employees to a non trading company within a matter of 12 months.
No he didn't, he said investigating ongoingYes, I agree - but the administrator has already done that as he has an obligation to investigate the validity of the assets in Limited. He has stated he has received all the information from all involved parties that he has requested - that include information from BDO, the auditors
Pax- Since SISU tenure can you tell me one aspect of the football club that has improved ..?
The law deal with what? Are you telling us you know they broke the law? Where?
I want to see it all the way back to 1995. That's where all this mess stems from.
How long to keep records
You must normally keep records for at least 6 years from the end of the last company financial year they relate to.
You may need to keep records longer if:
- they show a transaction that covers more than 1 of the company’s accounting period
- the company has bought something that it expects to last more than 6 years, like equipment or machinery
- you sent your Company Tax Return late
- HMRC have started a compliance check into your Company Tax Return
No he didn't, he said investigating ongoing
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?