Fisher's public e-mail stated that he was satisfied with the £400k rent offer-he is purely disputing access to revenues, overtly to meet League 1 FFP requirements. With all the empty threats he has issued since this boycott first started, why he would jeapordise the club's future for the sake of an extra £100-200k per year (Mr D. Bell earning that I suspect) is beyond me. Why people back his stance even more so.
Wow 17 pages of horse shit on the same subject being discussed in nearly all the other threads.
Its so tedious now, I forget sometimes we play football, as i just thought we supported SISU or ACL, and actually we no longer have a team.
Perhaps we should all turn up at the court hearing to cheer on our favourite team of lawyers, prosescution or defence.
Oh and the reason I quoted your post Dadgad, is that in all 17 pages in my humble opinion, it is the most ridiculous, calling people who disagree with you worms. :facepalm:
Exactly what I've been saying...the rent is a smokescreen...it's small change in the overall scheme of things and the Pro SISU lobby do themselves no favours by constantly harping on about it. They are supporting owners who have openly said they will liquidate us for the sake of that small change...can't understand that thinking myself.
Who for example in their right minds can dare to call themselves a fan, yet support a regime that attacks the very fans that are their lifeblood?
those scum who support SiSU are the ones who buy season tickets
Hypocricy
It really astonishes me the depths the pro-sisu side go to to defend the indefensible. They seem oblivious to the blatant brinkmanship of these SiSU people, yet blather on how tyrannical the council are!
As for the lack of a credible alternative nonsense - well SiSU went out of its way to turn down one offer on the table - with absolutely no logical reason as to why! With debts well over £40 million at the time, how on earth can anyone claim the club is undervalued? SiSU went out of its way to ensure anything of value was sold at the earliest of opportunities, whilst at the same time going out of its way to make the event of going to watch football games as unpallatable as possible.
Who for example in their right minds can dare to call themselves a fan, yet support a regime that attacks the very fans that are their lifeblood? How many times have SiSU said they have listened to the fans and are listeneing, yet have changed absolutely nothing?
How can any moral person actually support an organisation, that in effect steals shares from fans who have held those shares for years, offering no payment, and expect to be thanked for doing so?
It is utterly repugnant that these so-called fans (clearly they aren't) claim to have the best interest of the club at heart, yet expect - no demand, that the arena be handed over in effect for free! ACL have bent over backwards throughout this (too much imho) yet SiSU seem to reject out of hand ANY offer, they just want it for free AND the food and drink money!
To those who support SiSU I say leave Coventry city football club, you are not fans and most definitely you are not welcome. Its YOUR KIND that has ruined this club. SiSU are swines, but they don't pretend to be anything else, but those scum who support SiSU are the ones who buy season tickets that allow SiSU to stay and drag the club ever further into the mire. SiSU have no compuntion in blackmailing the true fans of the club on an almost weekly basis. How can you possibly argue there is no alternative to owners who are happy to blackmail the club - a club they clearly haven't invested in. You obviously are either utterly deluded, or worse deliberaately want to harm the club! City doesn't need so-called fans like you, and never will!
Its notable that when finally after 3 years the CET asked SiSU how much of this mythical £40 million SiSu have put into the club (as opposed to mere expenditure which is covered by player sales, ticket sales etc) they are silent - yet only a few weeks ago these same people who demand financial confidentiality, were quite happy to go public saying how poor a state ACL's finances are! Hypocricy - thy name is SiSU.
DO one - and take your deluded apologists with you - city will be far better off without them!
Couldn't agree more. Dadgad's abuse of fellow fans is becoming more extreme. Worms? And he "likes" the post by PSGM who calls season ticket holders "scum". And these people have the crass hypocrisy.
Regardless of who's side you are on in all this it is posters like these two who make it nasty and unpalatable.
Just thought I'd quote this before Jack gets his way and it's "cleaned up".
Agree with some of this but careful torch you ve accused those on my side of the fence of rejoicing in administration
Well ,some certainly seem to be doing just that.
He was the same poster who said Robins was an awful manager and relied purely on McGoldrick to get results.
Do you mean me?
I certainly never said that or anything like that, I don't know who did, you find it mate?
No not you Jack-psgm. He was anti-Robins from when he was appointed right through to when he left.
Just playing devils advocate ( I think MR was decent ) but I d liked to see how he would have got on now with Goldie gone and Clarke out
Well ,some certainly seem to be doing just that.
Just playing devils advocate ( I think MR was decent ) but I d liked to see how he would have got on now with Goldie gone and Clarke out
I'm not saying McG wasn't a big part of our upturn in form-but if you take away any player like that from any team and they will struggle. Fact remains that he inherited an absolute shambles from Thorn and Shaw and turned it round big time. Our home form was still poor, but we did things like break the club record for consecutive away wins, and tonked the likes of Donny on their own turf.
Not rejoicing in the fact of prospective administration, but rejoicing that it seems we are in the last days of the SISU regime
Well he has neither of them at huddersfield ....
Not rejoicing in the fact of prospective administration, but rejoicing that it seems we are in the last days of the SISU regime
Not rejoicing in the fact of prospective administration, but rejoicing that it seems we are in the last days of the SISU regime
My wife likes her Uddersfield
For some reason I see them clinging on to us whatever happens this week. (I base this on little more than being conditioned to nothing ever happening for the better when it comes to us rather than anything tangible, mind you)
We all know that
No probs one is ample. Would you prefer left or right?
I believe it is now beyond ever agreeing a deal - the trust between the parties is totally destroyed and I can really never see them working together in any way in the future and this is vital if both ACL and CCFC are to prosper. This is a real case of the whole being bigger than the sum of its parts.
It was telling that whilst we were signing people up for the Trust before the game yesterday the number of fans who seemed actually glad we were heading for admin if it meant getting rid of SISU and getting in new owners who would work in partnership with ACL. We must have the only fans who actually want their club to go into admin !!! We have good evidence that there are several interested parties out there, some of whom have made multiple visits to the Ricoh already.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?