SydneySkyBlue
Member
I've tried to keep a distance from the tedious melodrama that follows every council and club statement in recent times.
However, I am in disbelief at the length some on here will go to defend a company that has done such a shoddy job of running their club.
For the past 5 years they have made it more than obvious to you that your club is merely a hindrance to them in their desire to acquire the stadium it occupies.
The comical shenanigans we witnessed during that time - from directors sitting on the bench to suggestions that our mascot should lose weight - all stank of owners that didn't have a clue about football and had long since given up on that side of things.
They have simply hung around like a bad smell in the hope they can acquire the stadium on the cheap from a fallen ACL.
Now, with the council having lended its financial support and prevented a foreign entity from stealing a local source of pride, you are witnessing the sinister truth:
The company that own your club are willing to threaten its very existence in an attempt to secure what it really wants.
Why, then, do I still see people on here defending their actions? Have we gotten so used to them and so wrapped up in it all that we are missing the obvious ploy here? This is the equivalent of somebody holding a gun to your loved one's head in a last ditch attempt to acquire their house (or some better analogy that I couldn't be bothered to think up).
I'm just as tired as everyone else of this public spat and our club being dragged through the dirt with it but I'll make no secret that I fully support our local authorities in their actions on this one. They can blab on all they want about how unreasonable they believe the proposed rental agreement offer to be but SISU have shown nothing to warrant any kind of trust or support for their case from myself; would those that fall on the opposite side please enlighten me?
However, I am in disbelief at the length some on here will go to defend a company that has done such a shoddy job of running their club.
For the past 5 years they have made it more than obvious to you that your club is merely a hindrance to them in their desire to acquire the stadium it occupies.
The comical shenanigans we witnessed during that time - from directors sitting on the bench to suggestions that our mascot should lose weight - all stank of owners that didn't have a clue about football and had long since given up on that side of things.
They have simply hung around like a bad smell in the hope they can acquire the stadium on the cheap from a fallen ACL.
Now, with the council having lended its financial support and prevented a foreign entity from stealing a local source of pride, you are witnessing the sinister truth:
The company that own your club are willing to threaten its very existence in an attempt to secure what it really wants.
Why, then, do I still see people on here defending their actions? Have we gotten so used to them and so wrapped up in it all that we are missing the obvious ploy here? This is the equivalent of somebody holding a gun to your loved one's head in a last ditch attempt to acquire their house (or some better analogy that I couldn't be bothered to think up).
I'm just as tired as everyone else of this public spat and our club being dragged through the dirt with it but I'll make no secret that I fully support our local authorities in their actions on this one. They can blab on all they want about how unreasonable they believe the proposed rental agreement offer to be but SISU have shown nothing to warrant any kind of trust or support for their case from myself; would those that fall on the opposite side please enlighten me?