clint van damme
Well-Known Member
He should do. It would only be right.
Doesn't excuse what he went through but he is a hypocrite.
So Jack brooks is having to go through a diversity training programme because of what he said 10 years ago, so will this hypocrite have to go through and do the same thing then???
Two wrongs never have and never will make a right. People are now using what he said as a stick to beat him with. What he said was wrong, but that doesn't make it ok to say what he received too. Both actions are clearly wrong.
What I do have a problem with is not just this but all the other horrible little twunts storing things up to use at a given time and trawling back 10 years to find stuff. It's fkn horrendous. It should be about what we do tomorrow not what we did yesterday.
I'm not sure I understand that. If there's a pun in there I'm afraid it's gone over my head.Is that 2nd paragraph a quote from Jimmy Savile?!
He should do. It would only be right.
Doesn't excuse what he went through but he is a hypocrite.
I'm not sure I understand that. If there's a pun in there I'm afraid it's gone over my head.
I'm not sure I understand that. If there's a pun in there I'm afraid it's gone over my head.
Wrong! Just makes Rafiq look a bit of a silly bunt tooSo this new revelation means there’s no need to look at the alleged racism at Yorkshire Cricket club now, right?
He's been without a contract for the last 3 seasons and hasn't played a single first class game. Not sure who you think is going to send him on a diversity training program.So Jack brooks is having to go through a diversity training programme because of what he said 10 years ago, so will this hypocrite have to go through and do the same thing then???
Or who were all over this thread despite showing very little interest in cricket previously and are now either absent or failing to show the same animosity towards Rafiq as they had done initially?
Or who were all over this thread despite showing very little interest in cricket previously and are now either absent or failing to show the same animosity towards Rafiq as they had done initially?
Shocking if true?
I thought I wasn’t welcome in this adult conversation?
None of it is right. Not sure why anyone is trying to defend any of it.
What are you referring to?
Youre absolutely right on this, although not sure about the drinking. It's none of my business or anyone else's iwhether he's strict to his faith or not, but interesting after seeing the S*n jumping on the bandwagon to criticise team mates showering him in beer after a victory.What's shocking?
His antisemitism is, the rest of it?
He's an adult, he can drink if he wants.
Someone Pakistani or of Pakistani heritage using the P word is a whole different ball game to a white person using it, same as a black person using the N word is different to awhile person using it, (but you knew that).
He called acoach a wanker,so what, we've all done that.
Hes shone a light on something here and it's clear a certain sort of person doesn't like it but he needs some sort of punishment for his anti Jewish remarks as does the other player involved, if we're going to stamp out bigotry we stamp it all out.
Nobody is defending anything as far as I can see.
The only thing is Boosh, I mean Warthog, I mean Silenced Sloth seems to be insinuating that it doesn't matter that YCCC is institutionally racist or that Rafiq was abused because Rafiq made some anti semitic comments.
He should do. It would only be right.
Doesn't excuse what he went through but he is a hypocrite.
Well he's not actually contracted to a cricket club anymore, is he? That'd be the main barrier!No I absolutely agree, it doesn’t make what has happened to him right. But I’d bet my last pound he won’t have to go on an educational course. That’s what really pisses me off.
Well he's not actually contracted to a cricket club anymore, is he? That'd be the main barrier!
Well... unless it was Yorkshire of course, at which point it would be dismissed as just banter.
Nobody is saying that but you've saying him employer should send him on an educational course when he doesn't have an employer.Oh right , so because he doesn’t play cricket anymore it makes it ok then. Now i understand
Where did I say that?Oh right , so because he doesn’t play cricket anymore it makes it ok then. Now i understand
So someone you'd probably barely taken a passing glance to previously, isn't going on a course because he doesn't have a job and that really pisses you off? Surely mildly irritating at best or life's gonna be a pretty tough gig.No I absolutely agree, it doesn’t make what has happened to him right. But I’d bet my last pound he won’t have to go on an educational course. That’s what really pisses me off.
Doesn’t matter if he has a job or not, whether he is employed or not, if someone is being made to go on an educational course because of something he said years ago about a certain race or person, then if that person has also made derogatory comments about a certain race they should also be made to go on a course.
If everyone’s wants to be treated fairly and the same way then everyone needs to play by the same rules
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?