Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

YEOVIL - Smaller squad than CCFC ??? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter johnniericoh
  • Start date Jun 18, 2012
Forums New posts

johnniericoh

Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #1
Just preparing myself for the oncoming 3rd Division (as you do) by looking at Yeovil's web page and in particular the Players Profile details.

Looks to me that they have only13 players with squad numbers consisting of:

2 x Goalkeepers
5 x Defenders
3 x Midfielders
2 x Strikers
1 x no designated position

Obviously out of date or is it ?

PUSB
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #2
No way, hope it is true. It will be the first bit of good news in 6 months.

However if that is true wish we could play them 2 months in, not day one.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #3
dongonzalos said:
No way, hope it is true. It will be the first bit of good news in 6 months.

However if that is true wish we could play them 2 months in, not day one.
Click to expand...

Welcome to league one and this is why even with the clueless one in charge we should be a top 10 team providing we make 5 or 6 signings. Squads are wafer thin and budgets scarce.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #4
I really do hope it is true
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #5
Last season Yeovil made 16 permanent and 17 loan signings according to their wiki page. That blows our 3 permanent, 1 short term and 3 loan signings out of the water.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #6
..................
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #7
It also lists 14 current players - one of them is 40 and another (the top scorer) seems off to Swindon
 
C

cheever

New Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #8
johnniericoh said:
Just preparing myself for the oncoming 3rd Division (as you do) by looking at Yeovil's web page and in particular the Players Profile details.

Looks to me that they have only13 players with squad numbers consisting of:

2 x Goalkeepers
5 x Defenders
3 x Midfielders
2 x Strikers
1 x no designated position

Obviously out of date or is it ?

PUSB
Click to expand...

Can't be true...AT is the manager with the hardest job in world football, everyone else has riches beyond our wildest dreams to play with....
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #9
stupot07 said:
Last season Yeovil made 16 permanent and 17 loan signings according to their wiki page. That blows our 3 permanent, 1 short term and 3 loan signings out of the water.
Click to expand...

Also found themselves in the bottom three at Christmas, so got a new manager in.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #10
lordsummerisle said:
Also found themselves in the bottom three at Christmas, so got a new manager in.
Click to expand...

Doncaster did it even earlier and still went down
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #11
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Doncaster did it even earlier and still went down
Click to expand...

Also got loads of loan players in, which was championed as a clever bit of work on here by some..
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #12
Don't forget, some clubs - including Yeovil - have signed players who's registration comes into effect on July 1st; like with the Andy Johnson to QPR deal. Yeovil have signed Rueben Reed, plus one other on such terms. According to the BBC website, their squad numbers 31 people, although Nathan Jones, at 39 has retired from that number, and theyve lost Williams to Swindon as discussed. So allowing for players out and players in, it looks a squad of 30 players or so
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #13
If everybody goes who are rumoured to go. We will have 21 Including 7 untested kids.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #14
lordsummerisle said:
Also got loads of loan players in, which was championed as a clever bit of work on here by some..
Click to expand...

I thought that the consensus was that was a bit of lateral thinking that introduced players who might have proven useful, were they not manager by the most inept manager in northern Europe. I wonder how they'd have got on with their loan players and O'Driscoll in charge??
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #15
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
I thought that the consensus was that was a bit of lateral thinking that introduced players who might have proven useful, were they not manager by the most inept manager in northern Europe. I wonder how they'd have got on with their loan players and O'Driscoll in charge??
Click to expand...

Thorn went to Doncaster?

I thnk they'd have done okay with O'Dricoll in charge without needing the disruption that Mackay caused with his genius loan plan.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #16
lordsummerisle said:
Thorn went to Doncaster?

I thnk they'd have done okay with O'Dricoll in charge without needing the disruption that Mackay caused with his genius loan plan.
Click to expand...

Which tends to suggest you agree with me that sacking your manager in the hope that it'll stave off relegation doesn't always work? Indeed, you can end up in a whole worse position, eh?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #17
lordsummerisle said:
Also got loads of loan players in, which was championed as a clever bit of work on here by some..
Click to expand...

Just shows some of us can be wrong in our beliefs can't we Lord :claping hands:
 
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #18
The current squad position of many of our competitors means very little as most will have changes, additions, sales etc planned. At the moment we are planning to cash in wherever possible our best assets and promote increasingly younger kids to the fold who will cost next to nothing. Other clubs have sound financial planning and benefactors, we have a ruthless bunch of asset strippers............I still find it hard to blame our scout..............sorry manager !!
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #19
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Which tends to suggest you agree with me that sacking your manager in the hope that it'll stave off relegation doesn't always work? Indeed, you can end up in a whole worse position, eh?
Click to expand...

Couldn't have finished in much worse position than we did if we had changed the manager.

Ifs, buts and maybes, but the only definite is that we did get relegated without changing the manager.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #20
lordsummerisle said:
Couldn't have finished in much worse position than we did if we had changed the manager.

Ifs, buts and maybes, but the only definite is that we did get relegated without changing the manager.
Click to expand...

But the answer wasn't to sack the manager, but back the manager.

Just like Notts Forest did when they were in trouble
Just like Milwall did when they were in trouble
Just like Bristol City did when they were in trouble

Can you see what I've done there?
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #21
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
But the answer wasn't to sack the manager, but back the manager.

Just like Notts Forest did when they were in trouble
Just like Milwall did when they were in trouble
Just like Bristol City did when they were in trouble

Can you see what I've done there?
Click to expand...

Didn't Forest and Bristol City change their manager?

Doubt if you can see what i've done there.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #22
lordsummerisle said:
Didn't Forest and Bristol City change their manager?

Doubt if you can see what i've done there.
Click to expand...

Yup, and changing the manager made little difference. Know what did?

http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/L...ngham-Forest/story-15693997-detail/story.html
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #23
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Yup, and changing the manager made little difference. Know what did?

http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/L...ngham-Forest/story-15693997-detail/story.html
Click to expand...


Ha ha, at the same time we were given two loan signings in return for selling our top goal scorer, brilliant
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #24
How Forest ended up in a relegation battle in the first place with their resources remains a mystery to me. Not as big as Leicester coming nowhere near the play offs despite spending more than half of the Premier League, mind :thinking about:
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #25
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Yup, and changing the manager made little difference. Know what did?

http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/L...ngham-Forest/story-15693997-detail/story.html
Click to expand...

Nothing to do with O'Driscol then?
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #26
Whatever reason they were there, When it came to the crunch. Their board looked at it and thought, it is going to cost us 6.5 millon if we get relegated.

Board "Steve how do you think we can stay up?"

SC "Get me these 5 on loan, it will cost you 500k in wages and will give you a good chance of saving 6.5 million from relegation"

Borad "I would like to stay in the championship, lets do it"

Result forest stay up

Coventry

Board "Andy what can we do to stay up?"

Andy " We have kids on the bench and kids in the team. If we cant sign permanent players I at least need some loanees, if we go down, it will cost the club 6.5 million"

Board "Ok you can have two loan signings but we have to pay their wages, so you must sell your only goal scorer, so effectively you only get one additional player and you lose your only goal scorer"

Andy "That does not sound like a good idea, how about getting me the loanees and keep the goal scorer and sell him in the summer, you will get less than a million for him and it may cause us to lose 6.5 million"

Board. "We have sold the top scorer"

Result = relegation
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #27
Brighton Sky Blue said:
How Forest ended up in a relegation battle in the first place with their resources remains a mystery to me. Not as big as Leicester coming nowhere near the play offs despite spending more than half of the Premier League, mind :thinking about:
Click to expand...

An experienced manager is everything :laugh:
 

The Reverend Skyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #28
lordsummerisle said:
Couldn't have finished in much worse position than we did if we had changed the manager.

Ifs, buts and maybes, but the only definite is that we did get relegated without changing the manager.
Click to expand...

I was just about to write the very same words.

People who say what manager would come to us working with our budget, well they don't know that, some would, some would'nt

Until Thorn has gone and someone does come along and do better ,we all don't know

My opinion is that i would rather have someone here with more experience, and better man management.I beleieve we can't suffer his bad tactical slips and his poor man management this season, if we are going to be successful.What i am trying to say that Thorn himself will have to improve if the team are going to do better.He has to inspire all the lads especially the youngsters, and public criticisms of any of the youngsters have to stop. Be more positive Thorn and get behind them, all the time.
.
If SISU do go i also think Thorn will go with them, and the new owners will bring someone unrelated to the past in.

But the answers/opinions on all subjects concerning next season are all pure conjecture.

The Rev
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #29
Grendel said:
Nothing to do with O'Driscol then?
Click to expand...

My view or Cotterills? My view being that he was sacked too soon and could have kept Doncaster up. The perils of sacking a manager too early methinks.

Cotterill - a terrible manager in my view - attributes their safety to the loan signings, but it does coincide also with O'Driscoll arriving to help the coaching. Be it squad members, or coaching support, Id still classify that as 'backing' the manager as opposed to sacking' the manager. Don't you think?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #30
Astute said:
An experienced manager is everything :laugh:
Click to expand...

Two former England managers both sacked within months of a Championship season.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #31
The Reverend Skyblue said:
Until Thorn has gone and someone does come along and do better ,we all don't know The Rev
Click to expand...

Bleeding hell! Someone does come along and do better? What guarantees are there of that? Like Saunders at Doncaster, for example?

Like Thorn or not, via necessity, he's blooded and nurtured some great young talent - who clearly respect him as evidenced via comments. What if someone comes in, sells those players to free up wages for 'trusted' talent that doesn't work? We sack yet again, but have lost all our youth too?

The reality is, Thorn should have been given freedom to add a sprinkling of quality to the young lads he'd nurtured through out of necessity. If he had been able to do so, I genuinely believe we'd still be a championship team
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #32
dongonzalos said:
Whatever reason they were there, When it came to the crunch. Their board looked at it and thought, it is going to cost us 6.5 millon if we get relegated.

Board "Steve how do you think we can stay up?"

SC "Get me these 5 on loan, it will cost you 500k in wages and will give you a good chance of saving 6.5 million from relegation"

Borad "I would like to stay in the championship, lets do it"

Result forest stay up

Coventry

Board "Andy what can we do to stay up?"

Andy " We have kids on the bench and kids in the team. If we cant sign permanent players I at least need some loanees, if we go down, it will cost the club 6.5 million"

Board "Ok you can have two loan signings but we have to pay their wages, so you must sell your only goal scorer, so effectively you only get one additional player and you lose your only goal scorer"

Andy "That does not sound like a good idea, how about getting me the loanees and keep the goal scorer and sell him in the summer, you will get less than a million for him and it may cause us to lose 6.5 million"

Board. "We have sold the top scorer"

Result = relegation
Click to expand...

Sacha Baron Cohen's in charge of Forest?
 
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #33
Someone could also come along and do worse, at least Thorn has the respect and relationship with all the young players that we will be relying on.
The hard truth is in 90% of cases, investment turns football clubs round then a good manager, there are exceptions...........Holloway and Blackpool and in reverse, the six-fingered brigade up the road, but generally a good combination of both will reap rewards.
We however have got no money and a manager learning his trade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?