Actually think it's a good idea. Particularly when you see the daily mails last article on the subject. If ever you wanted proof that they don't do any research or check anything out before publishing that was it. Just put forward what Holdings had sent them some of which they didn't even attribute to them so that people could judge it objectively but presented it as fact.
It's very easy when you are on a forum to think everyone must know the background details because they've been discussed so much' but there are lots of people, fans and non fans but Cov citizens who don't, they are not on forums and many read things in tabloids and just take it at face value.
If you are going to get your message across you need to use as many media streams as you can.
If you can get it in one national these things usually get syndicated so would probably appear in most of them. Most of what is written in papers is somebody else's story with some rewording by someone who knows nothing about the story and therefore the wording changes often changes the crucial details of the story. This is why so much of what is printed in papers is complete piffle and turns out to be untrue.
I did contact the chief football writer, Paul Doyle, at the Guardian this morning and he did reply very quickly saying something would be included in the paper about us soon.