Just for fun.
No. Would worry about Phillips and Lameiras. Both have a part to play for sure, but I would like to see more consistency, especially for the right back role.Just for fun.
Imagine come January all our loans go back bar Murphy and we're told no-one can come in.
Let's say we're still top by a point on Jan 16th when Armstrong goes back.
Would this team go up, assuming no long term injuries?
RCC
Philips Ricketts Martin Stokes
Vincelot Fleck
JOB Maddison Lameiras
Murphy
S: Burge, Haynes, Harries, C Thomas, G Thomas, Fortune, Tudgay
Would this team go up, assuming no long term injuries?
RCC
Philips Ricketts Martin Stokes
Vincelot Fleck
JOB Maddison Lameiras
Murphy
S: Burge, Haynes, Harries, C Thomas, G Thomas, Fortune, Tudgay
Still so much better than Presley's isn't it.I love that that team is our worst case scenario
Just for fun.
Imagine come January all our loans go back bar Murphy and we're told no-one can come in.
Let's say we're still top by a point on Jan 16th when Armstrong goes back.
Would this team go up, assuming no long term injuries?
RCC
Philips Ricketts Martin Stokes
Vincelot Fleck
JOB Maddison Lameiras
Murphy
S: Burge, Haynes, Harries, C Thomas, G Thomas, Fortune, Tudgay
Just for fun.
Imagine come January all our loans go back bar Murphy and we're told no-one can come in.
Let's say we're still top by a point on Jan 16th when Armstrong goes back.
Would this team go up, assuming no long term injuries?
RCC
Philips Ricketts Martin Stokes
Vincelot Fleck
JOB Maddison Lameiras
Murphy
S: Burge, Haynes, Harries, C Thomas, G Thomas, Fortune, Tudgay
I think that is what Mowbray is aiming for alsoDon't mean to be too greedy, but I think we now need to aim for the top 1.
Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk
Worst case scenario is no tm absolutely
no Willis in the side??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?