D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
So who would you play instead of Sheaf and Eccles?? We don't have DeBruyne available.
So who would you play instead of Sheaf and Eccles?? We don't have DeBruyne available.No happy Palmer is starting above O'Hare, Eccles and Sheaf are going to get overrun in the midfield.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Is it?Well that really is all of what most people have said.
In normal circumstances we really don't have the depth in that position to drop one of our best players when he's on form.OR, he has noticed, like the rest of us, O'Hare's form has dipped.
I wouldn’t usually watch the pre match guff, but had to this time to see what shit they’d come out with.The pundits have never watched a city game.
Simms didn't get back to back hat tricks.
They are saying a lot without really saying anything because they have no clue.
ITV presenters clearly did all of five minutes Wikipedia research before this.
Why not just spend an afternoon on Twitter and forums and not look like a knob?
Palmer is playing better than O’Hare at the moment.Palmer over O’Hare a mistake imo.
Could well be.In normal circumstances we really don't have the depth in that position to drop one of our best players when he's on form.
I guess Robins feels he can't get them performances out of him right now cause he's checked out/not committed what ever people want to call it.
A really sad end to his city career it seems.
The pundits have never watched a city game.
Simms didn't get back to back hat tricks.
They are saying a lot without really saying anything because they have no clue.
I normally stand up for the TV companies as it is all conspiracy bias bullshit but today they are defo pro wolves I agreeHating this pro-Wolves ITV coverage. At the moment.
It's not just City fans. This is the age of the conspiracy theory.Why do City fans always go for some mental conspiracy about why someone hasn’t started that always requires the best manager of our generation to have gone quite mad?
O’Hare below par is as useful as Palmer on itIs it?
Seems that many are saying he SHOULD be playing. Playing even though he is out of form?
The coverage is like Wolves are already in the semis. I hope at the very least we make it difficult for them
Just said the same . I would love us to stick one over them even more . It’s all wolves and we haven’t got a chance . Let’s prove the wrongChrist, the ITV pundits is a wolves love in.
I think there is a legitimate argument that he is. Van Ewijk is maybe more talented but Wright is producing more.I love Haji, but no one who watches us could say he’s our best player.
Just a case of looking at goal stats and going yeah must be the best player
If he's mentally ok and committed he 100% should be playing today even out of form, he's proved he can find that form time and time again over his city career. The guy playing ahead of him isn't in great form and has never really been in form for his entire time here.Is it?
Seems that many are saying he SHOULD be playing. Playing even though he is out of form?
It's embarrassing isn't it.Hating this pro-Wolves ITV coverage. At the moment.
After nearly half an hour and glossing over us like we’re not even supposed to be here.Cov segment coming up now tbf
If he's mentally ok and committed he 100% should be playing today even out of form, he's proved he can find that form time and time again over his city career. The guy playing ahead of him isn't in great form and has never really been in form for his entire time here.
I guess Robins feels he can't get those performances out of O'Hare right now, call it a lack of commitment/checked out what ever you will.
Get someone else jn lolWhy are you putting the blame on Robins? Just weird.
I normally stand up for the TV companies as it is all conspiracy bias bullshit but today they are defo pro wolves I agree
Why is it pre recorded with Robins?
He’s a big part in a balanced team, it’s not like with Gyo where you could clearly see he was head and shoulders.I think there is a legitimate argument that he is. Van Ewijk is maybe more talented but Wright is producing more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?