SkyBlueZack
Well-Known Member
I suggest you look back up through the thread. All day? I gave up after a while, you didn’t. There’s only one cock out of me and you and it ain’t me.
And then you posted asking for an answer. Awkward indeed.
The exasperation gif was because I’d had two people wilfully misunderstand the same post one after the other. Also you’ve been a cock all day in the other thread.
In that scenario my main objective would be to prove I had done nothing wrong as you tend to find when accusations fly around but aren't fully examined the doubt remains.Are you telling me you’d be happy if I repeatedly took you to court for something you didn’t do because you know you did nothing wrong?
Well obviously if the EC find against the council they won't appeal it. After all how many times have they said a ruling should just be accepted and not challenged by way of appeal or further action?Once the EC has made a decision either way either side can appeal. We saw how long the JR dragged on until it was finally thrown out and no one recovers 100% of the cost of defending a legal action.
Alright mate. Come talk to me when you’ve had a few years of half the forum jumping on you, wilfully misrepresenting you’re view, bringing your family into it, saying your stupid, asking for you to be banned all because you ask a question or fail to take the approved forum view.
I am a bit of a dick, so that wouldn’t be the first time. Apologies if I jumped on you early, can’t be arsed to scroll back through that thread and see so I’ll assume I did.
In that scenario my main objective would be to prove I had done nothing wrong as you tend to find when accusations fly around but aren't fully examined the doubt remains.
Of course the flip side of that is if I was concerned that maybe I had done something wrong and might lose I would use everything I my disposal to try and pressure you into calling things to a halt.
Well obviously if the EC find against the council they won't appeal it. After all how many times have they said a ruling should just be accepted and not challenged by way of appeal or further action?
Give us a link then kid.
Wheres Mark_ccfc disappeared to?
All this bollocks about who said what and which group is run by who is noise designed to distract from the main point: our owners gambled the club on getting a ground on the cheap and so far it seems to have failed spectacularly.
I didn’t say this was vexatious. I was pointing out that there’s a valid reason to not be cool with being sued for no reason and the courts recognise that fact.
I couldn’t care less if they do distress Wasps (though as a tax payer not a fan of distressing the taxpayer), more bothered that this could lead to us out of Cov until your new kid finishes school.
The city council went into this with their eyes open aware of the history and the potential for further court action. In their usual condescending style they knew best.
I feel sorry for the people of Coventry having such supine councillors in the face of officers who give not a fuck about Coventry or its people.
Sorry but even with the pre-emptive insults you will never persuade me that the council did the right thing in facilitating a clubs move 90 miles across the country.If when all this is over Sisu are still unable to prove anything wrong then there’s a fair argument they did the right thing by protecting an asset and bringing a business with national profile to the city.
Wheres Mark_ccfc disappeared to?
Case closed( or not)
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Phew!am here - the whole purpose of me posting was to see where the statements of "The complaint to the EU cannot be withdrawn" came from. Oldskyblue confirmed it and shmmeee posted a link to a CET article stating that the EU themselves confirmed that it can't be withdrawn. I am satisfied - as you say "Case closed".
you have more confidence in that than i do - why?
I have no expectation of knowing for sure any of the indemnities asked or not asked for. Given the history of this dispute i would need each party to be able to confirm exactly the same thing with no spin or interpretation - never going to happen.
probably thats why all the shite is coming out nowOne thought is this. If this is a formal complaint then the following applies:-
"The Commission services endeavour to investigate a formal complaint within a non-binding time limit of 12 months from when they are registered. The investigation could be longer based on the circumstances of the case, for example if the Commission services need to ask the complainant, Member State or third parties for further information."
Taken from section 9.2 from here:-
I believe the complaint was lodged in February? In that case could some kind of preliminary finding be imminent?
It's irrelevantOne thought is this. If this is a formal complaint then the following applies:-
"The Commission services endeavour to investigate a formal complaint within a non-binding time limit of 12 months from when they are registered. The investigation could be longer based on the circumstances of the case, for example if the Commission services need to ask the complainant, Member State or third parties for further information."
Taken from section 9.2 from here:-
I believe the complaint was lodged in February? In that case could some kind of preliminary finding be imminent?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?