If we get a sell on claus you can bet tm wont see a penny of it.
How's bakes doing?
Does Bakes have an effect on Wilsons performances in the championship and premier league since we undersold him?
I'm pleased for him, Cov lad and that (Grendel bite time) but I couldn't give a fuck really. Why is this even a thread?
If we get a sell on claus you can bet tm wont see a penny of it.
Is anyone even sure that we have a sell on clause?
Bakes certainly seem to have quite an effect on several posters.
None more than Grendull it seems. Given that we're talking about Wilson. Still, if I was a SISU cock sucker I'd probably want to change the subject too eh Grendull
We have a sell on clause and yes we were right to sell him.
How do you know? Andointlaugh:
The sell on clause or the transfer?
The sell on clause. You clearly know jack about the transfer because you think we were right to sell him for one of the low offers we received for him.
We have a sell on clause and yes we were right to sell him.
Is there no sell on clause then?
You seem to know.
The sell on clause. You clearly know jack about the transfer because you think we were right to sell him for one of the low offers we received for him.
Clearly I don't. The clue being that it was me who asked the question.
The transfer was the only option as it was the highest bid.
No premier league team valued him. There is zero proof you can ever offer he would have improved the following season with no Leon Clarke. Furthermore he once the offer was made wanted the move. He was gone.
Under Presley and de motivated his form could have slumped. He could have been injured.
You can't value any player on hindsight - actually not hindsight as you are valuing him in a different team and different leagues.
Hindsight was when the club turned down a bit for a player under sisu tenure and regretted it.
As for the sell on clause that was confirmed by Ashbyjan when the question was raised at an SCG meeting
It wasn't the only option. Just because it was the highest bid doesn't mean it was a fair price for a player either of the quality he had already shown or the clear potential that he displays. Bournemouth probably still can't believe they got him for such a low bid. Even more so now.
Truth is you just don't want to admit it. You've even tried playing his form down in other threads in the second half of his last season for us in the past conveniently forgetting he missed a large part of the second half of the season through injury.
If you were to say it was a good deal at the time I'd say you wouldn't know a quality player if it smacked you square between the eyes. To keep on saying it I'd say you're ignorant of the facts. You can't even bring yourself to say, yes with the benefiting of hindsight it was clearly a bad deal for us and a bargain for Bournemouth.
I hope Jan is right and there is a sell on clause. At least we might actually be able to recoup some of the losses from what was a poor deal for the club and used to fill the losses that our investors were supposed to cover from poor decision making for the club. Let's just hope it goes to TM and not the "not real debt" that incurs interest.
It wasn't the only option. Just because it was the highest bid doesn't mean it was a fair price for a player either of the quality he had already shown or the clear potential that he displays. Bournemouth probably still can't believe they got him for such a low bid. Even more so now.
Truth is you just don't want to admit it. You've even tried playing his form down in other threads in the second half of his last season for us in the past conveniently forgetting he missed a large part of the second half of the season through injury.
If you were to say it was a good deal at the time I'd say you wouldn't know a quality player if it smacked you square between the eyes. To keep on saying it I'd say you're ignorant of the facts. You can't even bring yourself to say, yes with the benefiting of hindsight it was clearly a bad deal for us and a bargain for Bournemouth.
I hope Jan is right and there is a sell on clause. At least we might actually be able to recoup some of the losses from what was a poor deal for the club and used to fill the losses that our investors were supposed to cover from poor decision making for the club. Let's just hope it goes to TM and not the "not real debt" that incurs interest.
You seem very reluctant to acknowledge there is a sell on clause?
I hope he does get an England call up and go all of the way too!
Oh, just as you are telling others they don't know anything about it I assumed you would know it all?
Or, you are trying to imply the sell on clause is bullshit.
You seem very reluctant to acknowledge there is a sell on clause?
It was a shit deal for the club and anyone who says otherwise either knows jack about football or at least less than me (which admittedly isn't a lot) or are just ignorant to the facts.
Have the club ever officially disclosed the details of the deal? Not to my knowledge. The best we've heard speculated is £2M rising to £3M. Does this mean we have a sell on clause so if they sell we have £1M coming our way or is it linked to appearances, promotion etc. Have we already received any other money due from the deal? Did this make up any of TM current budget? Is there a windfall to come?
Like I said. I asked the question if anyone was even sure we have a sell on clause?
It was a shit deal for the club and anyone who says otherwise either knows jack about football or at least less than me (which admittedly isn't a lot) or are just ignorant to the facts.
Have the club ever officially disclosed the details of the deal? Not to my knowledge. The best we've heard speculated is £2M rising to £3M. Does this mean we have a sell on clause so if they sell we have £1M coming our way or is it linked to appearances, promotion etc. Have we already received any other money due from the deal? Did this make up any of TM current budget? Is there a windfall to come?
Like I said. I asked the question if anyone was even sure we have a sell on clause?
Probably because I don't know there is one. I don't know if you noticed but I did ask the question a page or two back.
Embarrassing isn't it.
We received a 6 figure sum when Bournemouth were promoted apparently, we have a sell on clause and don't know what the other clauses are.It was a shit deal for the club and anyone who says otherwise either knows jack about football or at least less than me (which admittedly isn't a lot) or are just ignorant to the facts.
Have the club ever officially disclosed the details of the deal? Not to my knowledge. The best we've heard speculated is £2M rising to £3M. Does this mean we have a sell on clause so if they sell we have £1M coming our way or is it linked to appearances, promotion etc. Have we already received any other money due from the deal? Did this make up any of TM current budget? Is there a windfall to come?
Like I said. I asked the question if anyone was even sure we have a sell on clause?
Pretty sure it's been disclosed in multiple places about the sell on clause hasn't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?