The CableGuy
Well-Known Member
Sure. So why aren't they asking SISU relevant questions as well?
Last edited:
Isn't it a legitimate question to ask?
If they refused to allow them to cover games, would that not be a breach of contract? Surely Sisu wouldn't break a contractual agreement?
This is starting to piss me off.
Is he afraid to say he wants to speak to someone from SISU?
Sent 3 texts now and an email asking him that question but can't see him reading them out...
Fletcher - need to find new owners who will put in £30m, £40m or £50 m per year.
Wow, those losses are really building up!
Also said that rent was set while the club was in the Premiership. Err, no, it wasn't.
I think we all agree that the football club needs to own the ground, but he's being a little simplistic in his analysis.
Fletcher is talking garbage if he's said the losses are on that scale-our only expenditure is on wages (since the rent seems optional) and those will be, including all non footballing staff, at a maximum of £5-6m a year. He's even wider of the mark than Linnell.
Reckon he was potentially referring to a post operation Premiership campaign success.
Fletcher is talking garbage if he's said the losses are on that scale-our only expenditure is on wages (since the rent seems optional) and those will be, including all non footballing staff, at a maximum of £5-6m a year. He's even wider of the mark than Linnell.
The only surprise here is that we're expressing surprise when there is none .For the whole epoch of this SAGA ,their coverage has been Skewed towards the SISU viewpoint .Now that possibly suggests Bias, Fear ,or Ignorance of how the Fanbase /folk of this City actually feel about /towards the clubs owners.Strangely while having a pint before the game today this topic cropped up with a member of the printed press,he kind of concurred but thought the CT was equally biased the other way.
Unfortunately I suspect he was drunk, hence his historically innacuate performance.
I can accept someone who has a different opinion to me, however I cannot accept historical innacuracies.
I don't think you do, hence why you say he was drunk. I've no axe to grind, wasn't particularly keen on the chap, but had his point of view. Doesn't mean he was drunk! He'll know more about it than you or I or anyone else on this forum who's slagged him off.
Unfortunately I suspect he was drunk, hence his historically innacuate performance.
I can accept someone who has a different opinion to me, however I cannot accept historical innacuracies.
I don't think you do, hence why you say he was drunk. I've no axe to grind, wasn't particularly keen on the chap, but had his point of view. Doesn't mean he was drunk! He'll know more about it than you or I or anyone else on this forum who's slagged him off.
PF has forgotten more than we know about the ricoh in the last 8 years or so, if anybody listens again they will find he is accurate in a lot of things regarding the ownership of the whole stadium.
I dislike sisu and wish they had never arrived here , BUT as has been mentioned before the current owners of the stadium were meant to be CUSTODIANS not the outright owners. Forget the Higgs share ,they will sell back to anybody, its the council that is the problem because now their nose is in the trough they will never sell to anybody.
Regarding the 40-50 mill PF alluded to ,he was talking over x amount of years not per season. I personally appreciated his honesty when he was here and as he said one of the reasons he left was because he felt too many lies would be told as to how we were being shafted.
By the way ,he wasn't drunk everyone from Burnley sounds like that.
Unfortunately I suspect he was drunk, hence his historically innacuate performance.
I can accept someone who has a different opinion to me, however I cannot accept historical innacuracies.
PF has forgotten more than we know about the ricoh in the last 8 years or so, if anybody listens again they will find he is accurate in a lot of things regarding the ownership of the whole stadium. </p>
<p>I dislike sisu and wish they had never arrived here , BUT as has been mentioned before the current owners of the stadium were meant to be CUSTODIANS not the outright owners. Forget the Higgs share ,they will sell back to anybody, its the council that is the problem because now their nose is in the trough they will never sell to anybody.</p>
<p>Regarding the 40-50 mill PF alluded to ,he was talking over x amount of years not per season. I personally appreciated his honesty when he was here and as he said one of the reasons he left was because he felt too many lies would be told as to how we were being shafted.</p>
<p>By the way ,he wasn't drunk everyone from Burnley sounds like that.
I don't think you do, hence why you say he was drunk. I've no axe to grind, wasn't particularly keen on the chap, but had his point of view. Doesn't mean he was drunk! .
Sent 3 texts now and an email asking him that question but can't see him reading them out...
Listen to it again, Torchy....and tell me isn't slurring his words....
Also the last 3 texts he did read out we're all anti ACL. Not one against the tossers who own us. And I don't care what side people are on that sort of % against ACL is no way representative of how the fans are divided.
He glossed over the many texts urging him to get answers from SISU as it didn't fit in with his own agenda of taking ACL to task. "Yes we've asked them loads of times" wasn't good enough as far as I'm concerned. Joy Seppala and Tim Fisher were at the game where they had reporters! He wasn't too fussed with finding out what the hell they're up to...where we're going to be playing Friday...where is this golden share held. No he was just obsessed with finding out how admin was going to help the Club when PKWH etc have already explained their position on this, whether people believe it or not!
Sent 3 texts now and an email asking him that question but can't see him reading them out...
He glossed over the many texts urging him to get answers from SISU as it didn't fit in with his own agenda of taking ACL to task. "Yes we've asked them loads of times" wasn't good enough as far as I'm concerned. Joy Seppala and Tim Fisher were at the game where they had reporters! He wasn't too fussed with finding out what the hell they're up to...where we're going to be playing Friday...where is this golden share held. No he was just obsessed with finding out how admin was going to help the Club when PKWH etc have already explained their position on this, whether people believe it or not!
I have and he wasn't. It's just because he went against the grain, no more to it than that.
I love SISU. I want to have Joy's babies...
The club doesn't sell the radio commentary rights!
I remember him and JH having a set too live on air in 1981 when JH went for all seater stadium,Linnell was lost for words when JH said we both have beards but we will never agree on this subject.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?