Don't you think a proper valuation should be done to see at least market value and to go from there? If the price has doubled then it's doubled so sisu pay more. If it's less they can try and pay less.
Nobody can be forced to sell anything, but at least it makes it clear if it's valued low but acl want silly money or valued high and sisu offer pennies.Nick you keep on about this proper valuation, if i owned the RICOH and it is the only stadium in coventry fit for league matches, SISU would have to pay me what I belived it is worth not what someone else valued it at.
That 1 million less than they paid was still reported as way over value wasnt it?
They have not payed as SISU do not have the money to pay it.
So you are saying acl and the council can do what they like and charge
what they like as ccfc have no other option?
Lets get serious , the whole city does city does not come with ricoh.The land around the ground would have been divorced from the ground. Lets us not keep feeding sisu disires of making a fortune from the ricoh.When the council sell the ricoh , it will be just the stadium , no shops no conference no hotel just the stadium
Lets not go on a tangent. I know this will work. The council will work with the skyblues trust Even if the club stops paying the rent.Coventry fans will not mind paying a voluntary £1 levy on matchdays to watch the skyblues at the ricoh.The council would love to have the team back in cov.A football team gives any city so much status and recognition. The skyblue trust needs to start doing something constructive, instead of being just a talking shop
Lets get serious , the whole city does city does not come with ricoh.The land around the ground would have been divorced from the ground. Lets us not keep feeding sisu disires of making a fortune from the ricoh.When the council sell the ricoh , it will be just the stadium , no shops no conference no hotel just the stadium
business people love money personal relationships do not matter
They have not payed as SISU do not have the money to pay it.
Utter nonsense - the liquidation of holdings hasn't occurred yet, surely that is the reason why. Wouldn't the money be sat with the administrator, in the same respect that a £1m bond sits at the FL?
They have not payed as SISU do not have the money to pay it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?