Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Why didn't we... (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter skybluetony176
  • Start date Mar 25, 2017
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #1
...go after MR in the first place? Like TM he likes to play football unlike RS who came in, tried to change the ethos and wasted a transfer window to boot trying to get players who buy into that ethos. MR would have been a natural hand over. I think RS appointment sealed our fate this season. MR getting the side to play a decent brand (by our seasons standards) seems just the tonic needed that would have given us a real chance of staying up. It's just all happened to late. He should have been appointed instead of RS and it just baffles me why he wasn't considering he ended up here anyway.
 
Last edited: Mar 25, 2017

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #2
Maybe we tried but he didn't fancy it back then? Who knows.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #3
It was the cheap option hills
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #4
Sky Blue Pete said:
It was the cheap option hills
Click to expand...

Cheaper to go down and hire him anyway than to bring him in three months earlier and maybe not go down?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #5
We should have fucked Mowbray off last February and installed robins then - as I suggested - we'd be in the championship now

It's nothing to do with playing football - it's basic organisation of the defence - which he has always been good at.

He also is an instant impact manager - he would have got enough wins last season to get promotion.

Although Slade was a disaster it's also interesting to note how many of Slades recruits are first choice.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueRuffian, KG7, Wyken Sky Blue and 4 others

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #6
The squads so poor its not capable of winning games remmeber...who needs a manager?

Lol
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #7
Sky Blue Pete said:
It was the cheap option hills
Click to expand...

The cheap option would have to have not picked anyone. How much was Slade on then?
 
E

Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #8
skybluetony176 said:
...go after MR in the first place? Like TM he likes to play football unlike RS who came in, tried to change the ethos and wasted a transfer window to boot trying to get players who buy into that ethos. MR would have been a natural hand over. I think RS appointment sealed our fate this season. MR getting the side to play a decent brand (by our seasons standards) seems just the tonic needed that would have given us a real chance of staying up. It's just all happened to late. He should have been appointed instead of RS and it just baffles me why he wasn't considering he ended up here anyway.
Click to expand...

Completely agree, Slade was an underwhelming, poor decision. As I said after the Northampton game, the appointment of Slade sealed our relegation.

His January window was pathetic, his tactics were laughable, his cap was embarrassing and the fact that he looked at Yakubu for two weeks and decided he was fit enough to be signed, says a lot about him......He was as much use as a condom machine in the Vatican.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #9
Grendel said:
The cheap option would have to have not picked anyone. How much was Slade on then?
Click to expand...
Venus was nothing the rumour I heard bout slade was less than £1k a week no idea if true
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #10
Not bad money .. I shouldn't mind a grand a week
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #11
Grendel said:
We should have fucked Mowbray off last February and installed robins then - as I suggested - we'd be in the championship now

It's nothing to do with playing football - it's basic organisation of the defence - which he has always been good at.

He also is an instant impact manager - he would have got enough wins last season to get promotion.

Although Slade was a disaster it's also interesting to note how many of Slades recruits are first choice.
Click to expand...

The squad wasn't right for long ball any man and his dog could see that.
The moment Slade never signed two bruising strikers.
He needed to stop by passing the midfield.
The team definitely look more organised under Robins no question
 
Last edited: Mar 25, 2017
Reactions: covcity4life and skybluetony176

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #12
Robins is a cracking manager and this level and I'd feel very confident of promotion next season if he sticks around.
 
Reactions: shmmeee, Otis and covcity4life
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #13
So did Tim Fisher screw up allowing Venus to take over with no managerial experience at all. Then sign a long ball merchant with our squad.
To be fair to him his first choice was JFH. I have a feeling Caldwell may have been preferred over Slade as well
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #14
skybluetony176 said:
...go after MR in the first place? Like TM he likes to play football unlike RS who came in, tried to change the ethos and wasted a transfer window to boot trying to get players who buy into that ethos. MR would have been a natural hand over. I think RS appointment sealed our fate this season. MR getting the side to play a decent brand (by our seasons standards) seems just the tonic needed that would have given us a real chance of staying up. It's just all happened to late. He should have been appointed instead of RS and it just baffles me why he wasn't considering he ended up here anyway.
Click to expand...

don't torture yourself mate.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #15
dongonzalos said:
The squad wasn't right for long ball any man and his dog could see that.
The moment Slade never signed two bruising strikers.
He needed to stop by passing the midfield.
The team definitely look more organised under Robins no question
Click to expand...

Did you go today? We won despite a very poor midfield performance?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #16
dongonzalos said:
The squad wasn't right for long ball any man and his dog could see that.
The moment Slade never signed two bruising strikers.
He needed to stop by passing the midfield.
The team definitely look more organised under Robins no question
Click to expand...

Did you go today? We won despite a very poor midfield performance?
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #17
Grendel said:
Did you go today? We won despite a very poor midfield performance?
Click to expand...

No had to listen on the radio unfortunately. Due to personal stuff.
From the radicsounds like we had a nice conbo of mixing it up between long ball and using the midfield.
When we did use the midfield they didn't sound poor to be fair.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #18
dongonzalos said:
No had to listen on the radio unfortunately. Due to personal stuff.
From the radicsounds like we had a nice conbo of mixing it up between long ball and using the midfield.
When we did use the midfield they didn't sound poor to be fair.
Click to expand...

Yeah they were poor. Bristol had a poor second half and we took the game to them better but we were outplayed in the middle of the park.

We won through having a solid back line and we rode our luck in the first half. Second half he moved Reid inside a bit and that seemed to work. Bigi was poor as was Reilly but Reilly has an engine so will always give you something.
 
Reactions: dongonzalos

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #19
Matter of opinion. I didn't think Bigi was poor. A bit hit and miss maybe with some of his passing going astray but on the whole more positives about his display than negatives.
 
Reactions: dongonzalos and clint van damme
T

thekidfromstrettoncamp

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #20
Irish Sky Blue said:
Matter of opinion. I didn't think Bigi was poor. A bit hit and miss maybe with some of his passing going astray but on the whole more positives about his display than negatives.
Click to expand...
Got to agree with Grendel how some people made him M O M I will never know
 
Reactions: stupot07

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #21
Grendel said:
Bigi was poor as was Reilly but Reilly has an engine so will always give you something.
Click to expand...

I found that the further away from the opposition goal, the better Reilly was today. He had a good line in breaking up attacks but just as good a line as underhitting passes to nobody in particular.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #22
Sick Boy said:
Robins is a cracking manager and this level and I'd feel very confident of promotion next season if he sticks around.
Click to expand...

steady on mate!
 
Reactions: phildownunder and Sick Boy
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #23
thekidfromstrettoncamp said:
Got to agree with Grendel how some people made him M O M I will never know
Click to expand...

A player who divides opinion Baker used to do that
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #24
You all know my feelings regards the incompetent Tim Fisher but in fairness to him let's be honest we all thought Russell Slade would do okay and get is enough points to survive, Fishers mistake was not elbowing Slade a month before he did, just watching the way he set the team up should have been enough to know he needed sacking.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #25
rupert_bear said:
we all thought Russell Slade would do okay
Click to expand...

Take that back. I'd never heard of the cap wearing pillock.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #26
I seem to remember most people on here being enthusiastic about Slade when he was appointed.
Didn't he have the reputation of being able to save clubs from relegation?
 
Reactions: phildownunder

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #27
Grendel said:
We should have fucked Mowbray off last February and installed robins then - as I suggested - we'd be in the championship now

It's nothing to do with playing football - it's basic organisation of the defence - which he has always been good at.

He also is an instant impact manager - he would have got enough wins last season to get promotion.

Although Slade was a disaster it's also interesting to note how many of Slades recruits are first choice.
Click to expand...
Agree with every word.

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #28
rupert_bear said:
You all know my feelings regards the incompetent Tim Fisher but in fairness to him let's be honest we all thought Russell Slade would do okay and get is enough points to survive, Fishers mistake was not elbowing Slade a month before he did, just watching the way he set the team up should have been enough to know he needed sacking.
Click to expand...

Read the previous clubs fans forums. Heard he was a long ball merchant.
Came on here and said I would accept long ball as a short term necessary evil to stay up.
Fully expected him to sign some beasts up front.
Once we signed no one of that criteria knew we were screwed.
This squad is not built for long ball. As shown today and last week it's strengths lie in through balls and crosses
 
Last edited: Mar 26, 2017

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #29
You are obsessing about slade and long ball, how many games did we actually play it?
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #30
hill83 said:
Maybe we tried but he didn't fancy it back then? Who knows.
Click to expand...

No, something more sinister. Must be.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #31
Nick said:
You are obsessing about slade and long ball, how many games did we actually play it?
Click to expand...

The 3 games we didn't we looked alright
Plus the checkatrade where the players couldn't even try those tactics we looked ok.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #32
rupert_bear said:
You all know my feelings regards the incompetent Tim Fisher but in fairness to him let's be honest we all thought Russell Slade would do okay and get is enough points to survive, Fishers mistake was not elbowing Slade a month before he did, just watching the way he set the team up should have been enough to know he needed sacking.
Click to expand...

We all didnt think Slade would do okay.
 
Reactions: wingy and Terry Gibson's perm

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #33
torchomatic said:
No, something more sinister. Must be.
Click to expand...
Not sinister just a huge mistake
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #34
dongonzalos said:
The 3 games we didn't we looked alright
Plus the checkatrade where the players couldn't even try those tactics we looked ok.
Click to expand...

So you went to every game - really?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #35
Grendel said:
So you went to every game - really?
Click to expand...

This is the man a couple of seasons ago admitted he didn't go to away games as he didn't like going to away games. All of a sudden he goes to every fucking one...or is it just Grendel being hypocritical towards other posters, again.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?