Grendel
Well-Known Member
Any club can say that and its better than renting a stadium you receive zero benefits from
We do well and 18,000 isn't going to be anywhere like approaching enough.
Interesting so please provide in writing on here a lie he has given
Oh feck off Grendel. At a time you know SISU's solicitors are watching sites such as this, you - for the sake of fun - try to goad someone into libel? Where the hell do you get off?
With 'fans' like this, I'm cashing in, sorry lads and lasses.....
Or just visit the following links:We all have access. Land Registry.
Or just visit the following links:
http://www.coventry.gov.uk/info/93/council-owned_commercial_property
http://www.coventry.gov.uk/info/593/land-availability_lists
Actually there is a bit in the new defamation act 2013 which I haven't read fully yet but appears to give operators of websites like this one a better defence.Oh feck off Grendel. At a time you know SISU's solicitors are watching sites such as this, you - for the sake of fun - try to goad someone into libel? Where the hell do you get off?
With 'fans' like this, I'm cashing in, sorry lads and lasses.....
Love the way some people use the wrong word sometimes and somtimes put brackets where they are not needed the post should have read 12000 stadium which is made of crap. Happy to help you fellow posters.
Any club can say that and its better than renting a stadium you receive zero benefits from
He didn't when Grenduffy's floppy-haired idol funded him within the bottom few in the league and sold the family silver. Still, I won't start that again now. I'd rather gouge my own eyes out with a rusty teaspoon than indulge Grendel's ego with further words to this worthless tat of a wind-up thread
But I still contest there is a deal to be done.
Let's not dwell on the past and the inflated rent and how things used to be. The key now is if there is a deal to be done now and one that beneifts all parties and I believe that there is.
Fisher in that link you posted says 18,000 but that we can grow. What's he think he can do, just water the stadium and instantly we will suddenly have a 25,000 capacity?
If we build an 18,000 seater stadium and then have success, there will be no instant capacity increase and you and I know it and so does Fisher too. It will take time to build and expand and in fact would probably lower capacity while any building work was taking place.
The whole new stadium idea is a joke.
A deal has to be done at the Ricoh, pure and simple.
More lies I see
Please prove it to be a Lie you accuse everyone but have yet not ONCE backed up your argument.
You call people lairs and ask for proof because you have not got an answer or proof on any of the Crap you preach.
you must have posted 10,000 posts with those words. copy and paste comes to mind.
Interesting so please provide in writing on here a lie he has given
http://stadiumdb.com/news/2013/07/coventry_new_stadium_to_copy_rotherham_tension_growing
As said its 18,000 unless you are prepared to call Fisher a liar - please confirm if you agree now its 18,000 or declare Fisher a liar
No I'm bored with people who quote facts (like 12,000 stadiums) which are made up crap
June 2013, letter to staff. Any possible stadium for a ground-share to have a minimum capacity of around 10,000 or more, 1st lie.we`re down to two or three sites in the immediate coventry area, and we`re going into the final furlong of site negotiations, 2nd lie. It is likely that in two or three weeks, we could be selected as the preferred buyer for one of these sites, lie 3.Would you like me to carry on Grendel, it must hurt you to agree with me as you have said they are not going to build a stadium.
Have you not updated your League Table since our accounts for that season were released?
Your arguments rarely survive a collision with facts.
Extract from shareholders meeting below ...
12,000 - 15,000 usually means 12,000 and 20,000 to 22,000 usually means 20,000
Uncannily the same as Rotherhams which is mentioned in the old article you posted above.
Does us all a favour, save us some bandwidth :jerkit:
Floor: "Who has benefited from the sale of assets?"
TF: "Otium purchased everything for nothing. No cash flowed. Writing off debt. Contingent payment".
SB: "Otium owned Holdings already".
SB: We’ve had to work with Companies House and BDO as lots of other auditors wouldn’t take us on.
TF: “Would you want your accountancy/auditor firm associated with all this?"
TF: "The stadium is based on 60 acre site which will also house the academy. 12-15,000 seater rising to a MAXIMUM of 20-22,000 as Coventry City won’t ever need anything any bigger than that”.
So after 24 hours of trawling that is the best you can do? I think you get easily confused as rotherhams design is mentioned you in your simple way assume the same capacity.
Even this one extract didn't say 12,000 did it despite your stupid comment its 12 - 15 so must be 12.
All public statements say more but you continue to misrepresent public statements - carry on.
That's the most ironic thing on here.
All this debate on here in reaction to the OP suggesting the fairest thing to do is let SISU build their own stadium.
When the OP themselves openly states that they do not believe SISU will build a stadium.!
Have you not updated your League Table since our accounts for that season were released?
Your arguments rarely survive a collision with facts.
I think its best to leave this thread where it is. It's not going anywhere. Opinion is fact to some. The same people do not consider the opinion of others because it does not support their facts.
So after 24 hours of trawling that is the best you can do? I think you get easily confused as rotherhams design is mentioned you in your simple way assume the same capacity.
Even this one extract didn't say 12,000 did it despite your stupid comment its 12 - 15 so must be 12.
All public statements say more but you continue to misrepresent public statements - carry on.
You should have either agreed or disagreed with the facts as I presented them; which I recall you didn't do - probably as it didn't suit your cause, or you were simply incapable. To not do so, and then come back sneering some months later seems a bit cheap if you don't mind me commenting so.
Cheap; but not surprising....
At least he has argument that can be collided. Rather than just running around throwing out insults and vagueries.
It's easy to never be wrong when you never put forward a case.
I did disagree with your "facts", you said that we had the lowest wage bill in the league at the time we got relegated, when asked for facts to back-up your assertion you gave half-baked guesses from the CET.
You are still saying that we had one of the lowest wage bills in the Championship, even though correct figures are there to be used.
I know it's unlikely that you will ever admit that you are wrong, but mere suppostion stated as fact seems to be your raison d'etre for most of your arguments.
Any news of this Cov fan threatened with litigation by SBT that you stated as a fact yet that you said you know?
So after 24 hours of trawling that is the best you can do? I think you get easily confused as rotherhams design is mentioned you in your simple way assume the same capacity.
Even this one extract didn't say 12,000 did it despite your stupid comment its 12 - 15 so must be 12.
All public statements say more but you continue to misrepresent public statements - carry on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?