Strangely it was replicated on GMK. Everyone answered 1. I guess that's the difference between a forum of CCFC fans and a forum who want the council / ACL to shaft the club over and over again.
Strangely it was replicated on GMK. Everyone answered 1. I guess that's the difference between a forum of CCFC fans and a forum who want the council / ACL to shaft the club over and over again.
CCFC v CCC is really SISU v CCC and Higgs. It is Paxo who has asked the question and he seems to be pro SISU with his posts so there is a good chance that it was going to be about ownership of the Ricoh.
....and as suspected when I posted the question - no one will admit anything unless it suits their own skewed view. Plenty of posters on here have attempted to hijack the original question to avoid an answer that most are too afraid to admit.
And that really is highlighting the problem we all face. Coming after the Hill protest where fans are having a go at fellow fans is it any wonder some just blindingly hold one view and refuse to look at the bigger picture?
When some on here start calling people names and dishing out abuse instead of debate, then you are the guys who have no argument and with it the chance of being taken seriously.
....and as suspected when I posted the question - no one will admit anything unless it suits their own skewed view. Plenty of posters on here have attempted to hijack the original question to avoid an answer that most are too afraid to admit.
And that really is highlighting the problem we all face. Coming after the Hill protest where fans are having a go at fellow fans is it any wonder some just blindingly hold one view and refuse to look at the bigger picture?
When some on here start calling people names and dishing out abuse instead of debate, then you are the guys who have no argument and with it the chance of being taken seriously.