which one to go? (1 Viewer)

SISU OUT!!

Thoren would do as good job if he was given some backing, id be fuming if he got sacked.

Would rather keep Thorn than SISU but would ideally like to see both of them leave. To be honest, Thorn would never have got the job were it not for SISU's cost-cutting so I see them as one of the same.

Jimmy Hill's Chin said:

Would rather keep Thorn than SISU but would ideally like to see both of them leave. To be honest, Thorn would never have got the job were it not for SISU's cost-cutting so I see them as one of the same.

Click to expand...

Not true. Say SISU had gone instead of Ranson, we'd still have Thorn as manager.

Hoffman is on the record as saying that he had discussed with Ranson the possibility of him as Director of Football with Thorn as First Team Manager some time back. Both Ranson and Hoffman are on the record as saying Thorn has their backing and deserves the backing of the fans. He'll be more secure AFTER a takeover now than if SISU stay, as they will inevitably use him as the scapegoat for their under-funding at some stage and fire him.

it would be all too easy to make AT a sacrificial lamb,
however the problem;
what needs to be addressed is the cause, & not the effect,
our woes have been caused by SISU & their footballing ineptitude,
which member of their outfit has any knowledge or insight as to how a football club should be run ?
please, please, please, will the prospective investors come to the fore,
'last chance saloon' for SISU,

PUSB

I don't think its fair to say SISU are inept at football. They are not running the club for football reasons, they are asset strippers & that is something at which they are very good.

the words 'fair' & 'sisu' should not belong in the same sentence,
furthermore the more they continue, the worse their 'brand' becomes,
any prospective future investor wouldn't touch them with the proverbial barge-pole,
time to go, methinks,
or, carry on & make your brand look even more of a disaster !

PUSB