Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

When did the East Stand at Highfield Road get built? (3 Viewers)

  • Thread starter StevieM
  • Start date May 18, 2017
Forums New posts
S

StevieM

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #1
My nephew asked me yesterday about the construction of the old East Stand, as he thought that its opening may have been his first game at Highfield Road, but since my memory is pretty much sieve like I couldn't put a date on it?
I used to go up Swan Lane on the way home from work most evenings to see how work was progressing and recall that we played for a while with a boarded fence behind the goal (with a mural painted on it?) for a while during the construction but can't for the life of me date it?
It was supposed to be the "dogs bollocks" with its Mall and restaurant but I always thought that it was more akin to the "dogs dinner" because of its poor design with pillars used to support the roof rather than the suspended type which we had on the old Main Stand!
I know it was of the Dion / Big Ron era-ish and post Kevin Gallagher but after that I'm done :bored:
The summer of '94 perhaps?
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #2
It coincided with the sale of Phil Babb, so summer of 94 sounds right to me.
 
Reactions: StevieM

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • May 18, 2017
  • #3
This should tell you

The History of Highfield Road - by Coventry City Club Historian Jim Brown
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #4
It was complete for the first day of the 1994/95 season. Partially opened for the last game against Blackburn of the season before to accommodate their large support.

It was another missed opportunity I think, the roof should have been a cantilever. Odd shape due to Swan Lane as well.
 
Reactions: StevieM and Brylowes

ovduk78

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #5
I think whoever was chairman at the time, may have been Poynton although the stand was built under Richardson, tried to buy the factory on the other side of Swan Lane but they wouldn't sell up. If they had we were going to build a much bigger East Stand with a bigger capacity and divert Swan Lane around it
 

Ranjit Bhurpa

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #6
ovduk78 said:
I think whoever was chairman at the time, may have been Poynton although the stand was built under Richardson, tried to buy the factory on the other side of Swan Lane but they wouldn't sell up. If they had we were going to build a much bigger East Stand with a bigger capacity and divert Swan Lane around it
Click to expand...
And with a much bigger capacity, perhaps Richardson's Ricoh folly would never have made it to the drawing board.
Ah if only....
 
Reactions: RedSalmon, Pete in Portugal, Astute and 3 others

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #7
Ranjit Bhurpa said:
And with a much bigger capacity, perhaps Richardson's Ricoh folly would never have made it to the drawing board.
Ah if only....
Click to expand...

It only really needed one large stand, the Sky Blue Stand could have been it as there was space for it.

I always felt that Highfield Road could have been turned 90 degrees and been rebuilt with Thackhall St closing.

I reckon the cost of compulsory purchase and demolition of the houses on the east side of Highfield Rd would be much cheaper than £20m to decontaminate waste land.
 
Reactions: Pete in Portugal, Moff, torchomatic and 2 others
S

StevieM

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #8
Both the old Main Stand and the Sky Blue Stand opposite could have been cantilever with double levels as the club owned enough land behind both to accommodate this.
It would have meant that we had twin level stands on three sides for a fraction of the cost of the Ricoh and given us probably an increase in capacity of 10,000 to 30k+?
Norwich had a similar sized ground at Carrow Road and developed it beyond recognition to the "old" place using corner "infilling" and some copious amount of forward planning.
 
Reactions: MusicDating and ovduk78

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #9
StevieM said:
Both the old Main Stand and the Sky Blue Stand opposite could have been cantilever with double levels as the club owned enough land behind both to accommodate this.
It would have meant that we had twin level stands on three sides for a fraction of the cost of the Ricoh and given us probably an increase in capacity of 10,000 to 30k+?
Norwich had a similar sized ground at Carrow Road and developed it beyond recognition to the "old" place using corner "infilling" and some copious amount of forward planning.
Click to expand...

Aye, as I have pointed out, the Arena project was as much a council thing as a club thing. The council had zero interest in the club remaining at Highfield Rd.
 
Reactions: StevieM, Moff and ovduk78

Ranjit Bhurpa

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #10
fernandopartridge said:
It only really needed one large stand, the Sky Blue Stand could have been it as there was space for it.

I always felt that Highfield Road could have been turned 90 degrees and been rebuilt with Thackhall St closing.

I reckon the cost of compulsory purchase and demolition of the houses on the east side of Highfield Rd would be much cheaper than £20m to decontaminate waste land.
Click to expand...
Totally agree. Also the sheer waste of £6m I think it was for the East Stand and it only lasted 6 years or so.
Madness all round.
 
Reactions: ovduk78

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #11
oldskyblue58 said:
This should tell you

The History of Highfield Road - by Coventry City Club Historian Jim Brown
Click to expand...
So 3200 seats in the upper tier of the west stand, anyone know how many the west end
Held? I would have guessed about 8000.
 

Ranjit Bhurpa

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #12
Brylowes said:
So 3200 seats in the upper tier of the west stand, anyone know how many the west end
Held? I would have guessed about 8000.
Click to expand...
Seated I would have thought less than upstairs, maybe 6000 in total?
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #13
Ranjit Bhurpa said:
Seated I would have thought less than upstairs, maybe 6000 in total?
Click to expand...
No talking about the west end, before it was seated
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #14
Brylowes said:
No talking about the west end, before it was seated
Click to expand...

I reckon around 5k max. The Spion Kop was 10.8k when it reopened in the 80s. WT about half the size.
 

Ranjit Bhurpa

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #15
Brylowes said:
No talking about the west end, before it was seated
Click to expand...
Before all seated the total capacity was about 36000 so 8000 probably about right for the West Stand.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #16
fernandopartridge said:
Aye, as I have pointed out, the Arena project was as much a council thing as a club thing. The council had zero interest in the club remaining at Highfield Rd.
Click to expand...

This is true. It was seen as too cramped and not enough space to expand. Ricoh was suggested at the same time as grounds were offered to the rugby club and the basketball team. Hope was at one point to bid for the national stadium, hence the original designs that without that context look massively over optimistic for the club.

Realistically HR was never going to be expanded. That's kinda proven by the comments here about redirecting roads and compulsory purchase orders. The council got two regen jobs for one (gas works and Hillfields) and the club in theory got a ground that could support Richardsons ambitions.
 
Reactions: Brylowes

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #17
shmmeee said:
This is true. It was seen as too cramped and not enough space to expand. Ricoh was suggested at the same time as grounds were offered to the rugby club and the basketball team. Hope was at one point to bid for the national stadium, hence the original designs that without that context look massively over optimistic for the club.

Realistically HR was never going to be expanded. That's kinda proven by the comments here about redirecting roads and compulsory purchase orders. The council got two regen jobs for one (gas works and Hillfields) and the club in theory got a ground that could support Richardsons ambitions.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I do understand why the council wanted it the way it was and don't blame them. Just think some of the contemporary comments about 'saving the club' or 'bailing it out' are shown to be nonsense by those facts.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #18
fernandopartridge said:
I reckon around 5k max. The Spion Kop was 10.8k when it reopened in the 80s. WT about half the size.
Click to expand...
Thought it would have been more, always thought it very deceiving, it used to
Protrude trom under the top tier by quite a long way (about 40 steps if IIRC)
It was also very shallow.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #19
Brylowes said:
Thought it would have been more, always thought it very deceiving, it used to
Protrude trom under the top tier by quite a long way (about 40 steps if IIRC)
It was also very shallow.
Click to expand...

Might have been more than that. It's hard to say really. Up until the stadium went all seater (36.5k):

Sky Blue Stand and terrace: 11k?

Kop and crows nest: 11.5k

Main Stand: 6k

West Stand and terrace: 8k (3k of this seated)

Sounds about right to me
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #20
fernandopartridge said:
Yeah, I do understand why the council wanted it the way it was and don't blame them. Just think some of the contemporary comments about 'saving the club' or 'bailing it out' are shown to be nonsense by those facts.
Click to expand...

Nah I don't think anyone saved the club, it was seen at the time as a win win and it didn't work out that way. I've very much third way on the Ricoh. Had circumstances been different (i.e. Had we stayed up) it'd have worked out fine. Too many variables around that time to point to one thing and say it sank us IMO. As it is we've ended up far too small for it and well we know the rest.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #21
It's annoying to think that there's a parallel universe where we rebuilt highfield road and are a properly run premiership team.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • May 18, 2017
  • #22
Liquid Gold said:
It's annoying to think that there's a parallel universe where we rebuilt highfield road and are a properly run premiership team.
Click to expand...

 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #23
shmmeee said:
Nah I don't think anyone saved the club, it was seen at the time as a win win and it didn't work out that way. I've very much third way on the Ricoh. Had circumstances been different (i.e. Had we stayed up) it'd have worked out fine. Too many variables around that time to point to one thing and say it sank us IMO. As it is we've ended up far too small for it and well we know the rest.
Click to expand...
Yep.
That pesky relegation!
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #24
Nick said:
Click to expand...
How did you know what I was planning this weekend?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • May 18, 2017
  • #25
fernandopartridge said:
It was complete for the first day of the 1994/95 season. Partially opened for the last game against Blackburn of the season before to accommodate their large support.

It was another missed opportunity I think, the roof should have been a cantilever. Odd shape due to Swan Lane as well.
Click to expand...

Was that the season we beat them?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #26
wingy said:
Yep.
That pesky relegation!
Click to expand...

Not just that, though that as the biggie. Also the demise of ITV Digital after we went down, the criminal mismanagement of the club post relegation that meant we never came close to coming back, I'd go as far as the Great Recession hitting not long after we moved as well.

Weve been really unlucky as a club with both owners and the circumstances they have found themselves in. I seriously doubt many people anywhere along the line wanted anything other than the best for the club but were just in above their heads.
 
Reactions: vow

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #27
Sick Boy said:
Was that the season we beat them?
Click to expand...

Yeah, the 2-1 game when Julian Darby scored twice. It ended Blackburn's title hopes that year.
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • May 18, 2017
  • #28
fernandopartridge said:
Yeah, the 2-1 game when Julian Darby scored twice. It ended Blackburn's title hopes that year.
Click to expand...

Thought that was the one...my third season watching Cov and my first season ticket...those were the days!
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • May 18, 2017
  • #29
And to think that there were plans drawn up at the end of the 60s for a 28,000 capacity spion kop!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?