Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

What would YOUR Team be V Tranmere? (6 Viewers)

  • Thread starter ohitsaidwalker king power
  • Start date Jan 15, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #36
were all equal(i dont wanna get banned)
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #37
covcity4life said:
=========murphy==========
christie==wood===edje==adams
=====jennings==bailey======
========moussa=========
baker==============mcsheff
=======clarke===========
Click to expand...


I'll have some of it too..
 
C

CTID

New Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #38
covcity4life said:
=========murphy==========
christie==wood===edje==adams
=====jennings==bailey======
========moussa=========
baker==============mcsheff
=======clarke===========
Click to expand...

Looks good to me, if bailey is injurred stick Connor Thomas in there.
 

scroobiustom

New Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #39
covcity4life said:
were all equal(i dont wanna get banned)
Click to expand...

Only some of us are less equal than others?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #40
CTID said:
Looks good to me, if bailey is injurred stick Connor Thomas in there.
Click to expand...

yeah that would be my replacement too
 
J

Jarvo87

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #41
Long time lurker, first time poster.

I can't see the pitch having improved from the Preston game unfortunately so I think we will see a lot more back to front football tonight with the midfield largely bypassed with us trying to play any kind of passing football in the final third. So on that basis I see no place in the starting line up for Moussa unfortunately - for what it's worth my line up tonight will be a 4-4-1-1 (or 4-2-3-1 dependent on your view) with Clarke up front with Elliott just off him, a midfield of Baker and Sheff right and left with Jennings and probably Bailey (if he is 100%), ahead of Thomas, central; Christie at RB (hopefully back to some kinda form) then the usual centre back pairing, Adams and keeper.

It'll be a case of horses for courses tonight. It'll be very cold and not very pretty so I'm anticipating a hard fought, scrappy and rather dull 1-0 win but personally I'd take that. Can't see many of us up there so attendance a shade below 10k.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #42
What about this,

4-2-1-3 (4-3-3)

Murphy

Cyrus-Wood-Edge-Blair
Thomas-Mouss
Baker
Elliott---Clarke---Elliott

This way you have a a lot going forward, but also 3 in midfield centre mid/CAM (rather than 2 CMs in a 4-4-2).

Mouss and Thomas would sit, with Baker playing a attacking role.
Also gives Blair and cyrus/Clarke a chance to bomb on.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #43
pusbccfc said:
What about this,

4-2-1-3 (4-3-3)

Murphy

Cyrus-Wood-Edge-Blair
Thomas-Mouss
Baker
Elliott---Clarke---Elliott

This way you have a a lot going forward, but also 3 in midfield centre mid/CAM (rather than 2 CMs in a 4-4-2).

Mouss and Thomas would sit, with Baker playing a attacking role.
Also gives Blair and cyrus/Clarke a chance to bomb on.
Click to expand...

Is Stephen Elloiot planning to cut himself in two people then?
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #44
covcity4life said:
=========murphy==========
christie==wood===edje==adams
=====jennings==bailey======
========moussa=========
baker==============mcsheff
=======clarke===========
Click to expand...

This but J.Clarke in for Christie and Thomas in for Bailey.
 

CovisGod

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #45
RoboCCFC90 said:
Is Stephen Elloiot planning to cut himself in two people then?
Click to expand...

Hahaha ! Was just thinking the same thing ! I presume he means Elliott one side and Sheff the other
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #46
Jarvo87 said:
Long time lurker, first time poster.

I can't see the pitch having improved from the Preston game unfortunately so I think we will see a lot more back to front football tonight with the midfield largely bypassed with us trying to play any kind of passing football in the final third. So on that basis I see no place in the starting line up for Moussa unfortunately - for what it's worth my line up tonight will be a 4-4-1-1 (or 4-2-3-1 dependent on your view) with Clarke up front with Elliott just off him, a midfield of Baker and Sheff right and left with Jennings and probably Bailey (if he is 100%), ahead of Thomas, central; Christie at RB (hopefully back to some kinda form) then the usual centre back pairing, Adams and keeper.

It'll be a case of horses for courses tonight. It'll be very cold and not very pretty so I'm anticipating a hard fought, scrappy and rather dull 1-0 win but personally I'd take that. Can't see many of us up there so attendance a shade below 10k.
Click to expand...

:welcome: ........
 
S

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #47
Thomas has to start in my view.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #48
Jarvo87 said:
Long time lurker, first time poster.

I can't see the pitch having improved from the Preston game unfortunately so I think we will see a lot more back to front football tonight with the midfield largely bypassed with us trying to play any kind of passing football in the final third. So on that basis I see no place in the starting line up for Moussa unfortunately - for what it's worth my line up tonight will be a 4-4-1-1 (or 4-2-3-1 dependent on your view) with Clarke up front with Elliott just off him, a midfield of Baker and Sheff right and left with Jennings and probably Bailey (if he is 100%), ahead of Thomas, central; Christie at RB (hopefully back to some kinda form) then the usual centre back pairing, Adams and keeper.

It'll be a case of horses for courses tonight. It'll be very cold and not very pretty so I'm anticipating a hard fought, scrappy and rather dull 1-0 win but personally I'd take that. Can't see many of us up there so attendance a shade below 10k.
Click to expand...

 
J

Jonny

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #49
Bell on the bench, you heard it here first.
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #50
Ok don't shoot me down here but if we want to play 2 strikers then why not play the diamond either type I believe it didn't work because of poor management but under robins it could work. Sure we might have to drop one midfielder but it is more attacking
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?