Are you from Essex?
...............Murphy------------
Christie-Willis-Edge-Adams
.......Baker-Bailey-Moose
Fleck
------- Clarke- Elliot----------
Willis as they depend totally on pace.
Also Bailey would told specifically to follow the bold fat play maker everywhere and hurt him.
Play 4-4-2 murphy christie wood edge Adams moussa bailey baker mcsheffery Clarke Elliot for me
The same Willia that is on loan at Nuneaton!?
why shouldnt we play it...?
Has he gone again? Maybe a missed it. I haven't heard anything since Robins blocked that move
Ok sorry SBT not read all of your threads.. not a stalker!
OK...
Fundamentally I think Clarke would benefit from a playing partner because of the kind of player he appears to be...not reason enough I know to rip up the whole blue print.. but I think the team needs to impose itself in an attacking sense at home. 4321.. or 4411 I think leaves us short of the attacking impetuous?
Think we need to give elliott a start alongside Clarke. They could form a useful partnership.
451/4231 is not working at home so we need to try something different and I've a feeling that MR will go with 442 tomorrow.
... My mistake, I has missed that story.
He won't start anyway, not good enough yet, send him to a high NL or L2 club to get exp?
... My mistake, I has missed that story.
He won't start anyway, not good enough yet, send him to a high NL or L2 club to get exp?
I think the calls for 442 come mainly from people wishing to give Elliott a starting role which is understandable, not because they think it is a particularly good formation
Maybe we could go to a proper 433 with Sheff--Clarke--Elliott all basically as strikers, would mean Baker would likely be dropped though which would be a big decision
Baker and Moussa are primarily midfielders, it would be no different to what we are playing nowFront 3 would have to be: Baker Clarke Moussa
Sheff has scored too little to start...
I think the calls for 442 come mainly from people wishing to give Elliott a starting role which is understandable, not because they think it is a particularly good formation
Maybe we could go to a proper 433 with Sheff--Clarke--Elliott all basically as strikers, would mean Baker would likely be dropped though which would be a big decision
Did the shadow squad get that game in on monday,anyone know how it went ,Too early for DB,lobjoit ,we hav'nt heard much of him lately .
=========murphy==========
christie==wood===edje==adams
=====jennings==bailey======
========moussa=========
baker==============mcsheff
=======clarke===========
=========murphy==========
christie==wood===edje==adams
=====jennings==bailey======
========moussa=========
baker==============mcsheff
=======clarke===========
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?