... were owned solely by CCC?
What if a charity had never been involved?
Would it had made any difference to the negotiations?
Would there ever have been a rent strike?
Would we the fans have demanded the city to sell ACL to the club at the prize of the mortgage?
Would this have ever gone to the court?
... were owned solely by CCC?
What if a charity had never been involved?
Would it had made any difference to the negotiations?
Would there ever have been a rent strike?
Would we the fans have demanded the city to sell ACL to the club at the prize of the mortgage?
Would this have ever gone to the court?
Yes I think so, SISU obviously don't want to pay the rent and rejected very good offers, the charity is irrelevant it's just got a seat (or two?) on the board and could be out voted.
Well they will argue the rent would still be 1.3m, but then, is an 900k discount any use if you still won't pay it? And was any of it worth it to find ourselves at this end-game? Nope.
I think the fact Higgs were in the equation weakened the Councils hand to be honest .
A slightly devisive component in terms of allowing SISU to use them as a stalking horse into the detail of ACL's existence.
What if SISU had actually carried through on their promise to buy into the stadium at the beginning of their tenure as promised instead of giving us years of false promises?
... were owned solely by CCC?
What if a charity had never been involved?
Would it had made any difference to the negotiations?
Would there ever have been a rent strike?
Would we the fans have demanded the city to sell ACL to the club at the prize of the mortgage?
Would this have ever gone to the court?
... were owned solely by CCC?
What if a charity had never been involved?
Would it had made any difference to the negotiations?
Would there ever have been a rent strike?
Would we the fans have demanded the city to sell ACL to the club at the prize of the mortgage?
Would this have ever gone to the court?