Nene park is the venue if a Ricoh deal can be sorted, that's why the utilities have been switched back on anonymously, but its sisu....
But more shockingly what I was told today is Joe Murphy is one that there tryin to offload due to wages.....
Anyone got there gloves or know quirkys number.....
You do talk utter bolloxDon't worry, SISU plan allows for another relegation.. do you think championship relegation was accident?
A drop to D4 will suit them, it requires less money to finance, so it makes complete sense in their world.. they will aim to break even in D4.. then bring club back to Ricoh, something like that.. players all on low salaries (so run of the mill stuff)
Not a surprise if the rumour about murphy is true, fisher said at the forum that we have a few players on more that £7k per week. Cant afford to be paying that kind of money in league one.
Nene park is the venue if a Ricoh deal can be sorted, that's why the utilities have been switched back on anonymously, but its sisu....
But more shockingly what I was told today is Joe Murphy is one that there tryin to offload due to wages.....
Anyone got there gloves or know quirkys number.....
Nene park is the venue if a Ricoh deal can be sorted, that's why the utilities have been switched back on anonymously, but its sisu... ....
It's amazing what we call a high earner these days, when Andy Carroll has just signed a £100,000 a week contract.losing murphy was an inevitability anyway as hes a high earner ,but nene park.....dear god:facepalm:
McSheff and Wood and poss Bell
No way is Murphy on 7k a week
You would hope not, but we did pay juke £7k per week and he came out of a reserve team, murphy was an experienced player...someone on here said baker was on £7k per week a few months ago
Was deliu in charge when murphy was signed?
Yep, Signed the beginning of the relegation season.
No, I believe McDonald is earning a pukka pie and a pea fritter per week, which is considerably more than what most of the players earn, or deserveThen he will be a high earner. He has a stupid idea of a very small squad of high earners. McDonald I believe is on even more and bell baker and mcsheffrey were all offered lucrative contract extensions.
No, I believe McDonald is earning a pukka pie and a pea fritter per week, which is considerably more than what most of the players earn, or deserve
No your confused. Pukka pies are his sponsor and he eats lots if them every day.
Timmy told us it was within 30 miles, nene park is 51!.
Sure timmy wouldnt mislead us
Nene park is the venue if a Ricoh deal can be sorted, that's why the utilities have been switched back on anonymously, but its sisu....
But more shockingly what I was told today is Joe Murphy is one that there tryin to offload due to wages.....
Anyone got there gloves or know quirkys number.....
You do talk utter bollox
It now makes me laugh anyone who is pro SISU. There excuse is that they are supporting ccfc. Forgetting that by doing so is only supporting ccfc to a path which will lead to even further relegations.
No he talks sense, it will be part of SISU's plan. It's called asset stripping, it's not rocket science. The club is not a profitable business so they run that part into the ground whilst still extracting money, creating debt. They put all the liabilities into one company then liquidate it whilst the company with any (potential) assets carries on with the same directors. Sound familiar, they also have The Ricoh in their sites as we all know. The new ground and any investment at all in what is a failing business is pure mythology. I can't blame some of you though, believing in myths can be quite fun.
So you're saying that the best way to get rid of the assett stripper is to force the council to get the Ricoh and ACL into sisu's hands so they can then sell at a profit to another interested party and unless they get a fixed assett we are stuck with sisu?They have a potential asset in The Ricoh - you can see from their actions that this is the main plan. What happened to Ryton, players, future season ticket sales, etc, etc. What happened to any liabilities - it all got piled into one company and now they are going to liquidate it. It's not a first it happens regularly in the filthy world of business. List me what are assets were and what happened to any of them - obvious. I'm not having a go at anyone it's just people failing to see what is absolutely obvious. Another phrase that is used is 'Phoenixing' - this very much true for what they're doing.
They have a potential asset in The Ricoh - you can see from their actions that this is the main plan. What happened to Ryton, players, future season ticket sales, etc, etc. What happened to any liabilities - it all got piled into one company and now they are going to liquidate it. It's not a first it happens regularly in the filthy world of business. List me what are assets were and what happened to any of them - obvious. I'm not having a go at anyone it's just people failing to see what is absolutely obvious. Another phrase that is used is 'Phoenixing' - this very much true for what they're doing.
Only £11m, gosh!! Where did I state any different. The real liabilities got piled into limited - the REAL liability actually being the 49 year lease of the ricoh along with the rest. Come on we all know that! It is certainly not based on false premise. Me thinks your speculations are either based in free enterprise gone mad or wishful thinking. Some of us have had enough of both of these.
I have many times said the debts in limited was to guard against hostile takeovers. I have also said many times that limited will be liquidated as part of the exit from administration (owners voluntary liquidation) and that would break the lease with ACL.
I think it's a very, very good thing that the club is now free of the lease - don't you?
Ah so it's asset stripping. How does that work when there are no assets to strip? If they owned the Ricoh they would have an asset that could be stripped, but then they would probably also have a profitable club and not a distressed company ripe for asset stripping.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?