After we scored, just saw it all kicking off.
Why?Pretty sure it involved O’hare too. Lowe was trying to get at him
What to give him another kick like his players had been doingWhy?
Players like O’Hare get that treatment you stop them anyway you can that’s footballGet Adi on the pitch and see the protection O’Hare gets then
O'Hare was definitely in the thick of it.Pretty sure it involved O’hare too. Lowe was trying to get at him
Well the protection he got today was an omnishamblesO'Hare was definitely in the thick of it.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Players like O’Hare get that treatment you stop them anyway you can that’s football
Would you agree if we stopped flair players the same ? Or is that ok ?No it's not football. It's quite literally against the rules. It's gamesmanship plain and simple.
Would you agree if we stopped flair players the same ? Or is that ok ?
Agreed but it’s part of the game weather we like it or not we need strong ref’sNo it's not okay. Its a ridiculous way to stop players. I would hate for us to act like that and my posting history will back that up.
Its like we all know players get a yellow for cumulative fouls but that isn't in the rules. Why not just apply the same logic. If you reach the threshold just book the next player who makes a foul.Rotating fouls on a player is exploiting a loophole in the rules. It should be banned. I’d be sending the medical bills to the ref and Preston.
Its like we all know players get a yellow for cumulative fouls but that isn't in the rules. Why not just apply the same logic. If you reach the threshold just book the next player who makes a foul.
Like most fans who don’t know the laws of the game, you have made yourself look a bit silly there with that statement.Its like we all know players get a yellow for cumulative fouls but that isn't in the rules. Why not just apply the same logic. If you reach the threshold just book the next player who makes a foul.
Like most fans who don’t know the laws of the game, you have made yourself look a bit silly there with that statement.
Cautionable offences
A player is cautioned if guilty of:
• delaying the restart of play
• dissent by word or action
• entering, re-entering or deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee’s permission
• failing to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a dropped ball, corner kick, free kick or throw-in
• persistent offences (no specific number or pattern of offences constitutes 'persistent')
• unsporting behaviour
• entering the referee review area (RRA)
• excessively using the ‘review’ (TV screen) signal
Intersting, so why doesn't that get applied properly? Seems a different threshold is being applied to 1st and 2nd yellows.Like most fans who don’t know the laws of the game, you have made yourself look a bit silly there with that statement.
Cautionable offences
A player is cautioned if guilty of:
• delaying the restart of play
• dissent by word or action
• entering, re-entering or deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee’s permission
• failing to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a dropped ball, corner kick, free kick or throw-in
• persistent offences (no specific number or pattern of offences constitutes 'persistent')
• unsporting behaviour
• entering the referee review area (RRA)
• excessively using the ‘review’ (TV screen) signal
Basically telling the referee to view the tv monitor repeatedly (making the tv sign). Really just another form of dissent regarding VAR.Whats that last one about?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?