As I have always said they have only 1 interest - fixture fulfilment. Sisu have fulfilled that since day one. Despite the comments regarding "get your money upfront from them" they also have paid all major creditors other than 1. In the leagues eyes are are very fit and proper owners.
how do you reach the conclusion they have paid all major creditors but 1 HMRC also voted against signing cva so they must be owed as well
how do you reach the conclusion they have paid all major creditors but 1 HMRC also voted against signing cva so they must be owed as well
i think its more to do with FL looking at situation and blaming the council
pitch invasion thing was out of sympathy for our plight that they believe is caused by the council.
As I have always said they have only 1 interest - fixture fulfilment. Sisu have fulfilled that since day one. Despite the comments regarding "get your money upfront from them" they also have paid all major creditors other than 1. In the leagues eyes are are very fit and proper owners.
I would guess a scenario could be the FL proceedures messed up when registering players, which was taken advantage of. I would guess that it has been pointed out that such errors would bring the right to governance in to question so they might want to stay quiet and ccfc would help them by staying quiet too. Also that any punishment of CCFC for their error would result in legal bills they could not afford to pay and the integrity of the competition is at stake - so best to stay quiet and accept.
just a scenario and conjecture nothing more - could be completely wrong and i am not making allegations of wrong doing
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?