Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

What could have been the match preview....... (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter TheRoyalScam
  • Start date May 6, 2011
Forums New posts

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #1
.....if SISU had stuck to their plan:

Norwich City v Coventry City

Norwich go into the final match of the season already guaranteed promotion. High-flying Coventry have secured a play-off position, but will be looking for at least a point to ensure they finish fourth. Both teams have no injury worries, but Danny Fox and Marlon King are both one yellow card away from suspension and may be rested or on the bench. Coventry striker Andy Carroll will be looking to finish on a high after scoring 23 goals this season. It is believed they will continue with the diamond midfield formation that bamboozled Norwich earlier at the Ricoh, when Coventry won 4-1.

CCFC - probable team:

Westwood
Keogh Dann Turner Hussey
Clingan
Henderson Cork
McSheffrey
Carroll Jutkiewicz
​
subs: Ireland, Cranie, Fox, Wood, Gunnarsson, Bell, King




:blue:​
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #2
Whilst we're concocting fantasies, in travel news the magical road made of pixie dust that leads to Carrow Road is freshly relaid ready for us to drive our robot cars with free petrol.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #3
I think I would go for King Carroll and the Juke up top with Sheffers on the bench. I also like what Hussey has done recently but would have Fox in ahead of him.
 

dojer

New Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #4
Why in your fantasy are Coventry only in the play-offs? Surely Pep Guardiola's Coventry have already secured promotion for our Sheikh owners with a record 135 points and looking to go for an unprecedented 100% season.
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #5
rob9872 said:
I think I would go for King Carroll and the Juke up top with Sheffers on the bench. I also like what Hussey has done recently but would have Fox in ahead of him.
Click to expand...

Read the preview - King and Fox are on four yellow cards - don't want them banned for the first leg of the play-off semi-final.
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #6
dojer said:
Why in your fantasy are Coventry only in the play-offs? Surely Pep Guardiola's Coventry have already secured promotion for our Sheikh owners with a record 135 points and looking to go for an unprecedented 100% season.
Click to expand...

Because my fantasy was based on what might have happened had SISU followed their initial plan.

Guardiola, 135 points, 100% record:thinking about: - you'll have us winning the FA cup and in Europe too - it could never happen, or could it?
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #7
ajsccfc said:
Whilst we're concocting fantasies, in travel news the magical road made of pixie dust that leads to Carrow Road is freshly relaid ready for us to drive our robot cars with free petrol.
Click to expand...

Now that's what I call real fantasy! Or do you think RR was lying when he mentioned Cork, Carroll and Henderson? Or that he [and Coleman] resigned when SISU out-voted him and sold Dann and Fox?
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #8
TheRoyalScam said:
Read the preview - King and Fox are on four yellow cards - don't want them banned for the first leg of the play-off semi-final.
Click to expand...

Good shout Scam, I stand corrected if one away from a suspension.

(As it's fantasy I'll agree but in reality five yellows isn't a ban at this stage. An amnesty in march unless it gets to about 7 I think all you get is a stern warning letter from the FA and no ban)
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #9
rob9872 said:
Good shout Scam, I stand corrected if one away from a suspension.

(As it's fantasy I'll agree but in reality five yellows isn't a ban at this stage. An amnesty in march unless it gets to about 7 I think all you get is a stern warning letter from the FA and no ban)
Click to expand...

Didn't know that, rob, so it's King and Fox starting and Jutkiewicz and Hussey on the bench!
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #10
Excellent news boss, I fancy our chances of getting that much needed point now
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #11
TheRoyalScam said:
Now that's what I call real fantasy! Or do you think RR was lying when he mentioned Cork, Carroll and Henderson? Or that he [and Coleman] resigned when SISU out-voted him and sold Dann and Fox?
Click to expand...


I think there's a bit of that. It seems suspicious to me that the outgoing chairman who's open to a return on the good ship Hoffman tells the fans the kind of thing that makes him a valiant superhero and the owners comic book villains.

People who were highly sceptical of anything Ranson said as chairman believe this kind of thing because it's what we want to hear.
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #12
ajsccfc said:
I think there's a bit of that. It seems suspicious to me that the outgoing chairman who's open to a return on the good ship Hoffman tells the fans the kind of thing that makes him a valiant superhero and the owners comic book villains.

People who were highly sceptical of anything Ranson said as chairman believe this kind of thing because it's what we want to hear.
Click to expand...

I don't follow your logic - if they were sceptical when he was chairman, why should they believe him now? I've always thought he was a good and honest chairman, and the bonus was that he's an ex-pro footballer. As an ex-pro I can't imagine why he would make up the proposed transfer deals of Cork, Carroll and Henderson - he'd be open to ridicule from all quarters.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #13
TheRoyalScam said:
I don't follow your logic - if they were sceptical when he was chairman, why should they believe him now?
Click to expand...
That is my logic. Ranson was being lumped in with big bad SISU as someone who's not to be trusted and isn't telling the truth, and suddenly he's gone and telling us about these potential transfers we heard NOTHING about and yet the same people take it as gospel, seemingly because it allows another gripe at the owners.
TheRoyalScam said:
I've always thought he was a good and honest chairman, and the bonus was that he's an ex-pro footballer. As an ex-pro I can't imagine why he would make up the proposed transfer deals of Cork, Carroll and Henderson - he'd be open to ridicule from all quarters.
Click to expand...
I don't think he's made them up per se, but I do think a massive amount of spin has been applied. The way we've heard it is that Ranson wanted it but SISU not only pulled the plug, but probably tied some housewives to the railroad tracks whilst cackling and twiddling their moustaches. It's all pantomime.
 

CovLis86

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #14
I dont think at any point a representative of SISU has said those Carroll, Henderson and Cork rumours from Ranson are false though....
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #15
I understand your point of view now, ajsccfc.:facepalm: Don't you think the writing was on the wall when we sold Dann and Fox, and recently when we tried to sell Conor Thomas?
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #16
There's a sense of inevitability to all such sales, but if they're being down to preserve the football club then I'll grudgingly accept them. I just don't think SISU are somehow trying to sabotage the club or doing anything out of spite or similar.

CovLis86 said:
I dont think at any point a representative of SISU has said those Carroll, Henderson and Cork rumours from Ranson are false though....
Click to expand...

I'm sure there's truth in that we had options on players, but not the picture that's been painted. Henderson for one; when he was here Sunderland were talking him up as one for the future, and he returned and went straight into the reckoning. Would we have ever actually signed him? I don't see it.
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #17
@ajsccfc - I understood that SISU's original plan was to invest in young progressive players and build a team that would not only get promoted, but that could survive in the Premiership with two or three quality 'promotion' signings. The considerable revenue from promotion would enable both the ownership of the Ricoh, and enough money to pay handsome dividends to the [SISU] shareholders. At that point they could even sell their shares/ownership, leaving the Ranson/Hoffman faction to continue their management. In my view they've lacked the bottle to follow their initial business plan, and all we've done is tread water. They don't understand football, and I remain deeply suspicious of their secrecy.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #18
I'm sure that was their original plan, but such plans need money and with crowds dwindling and the entire planet going into financial meltdown, their football expertise doesn't really bear much relevance when they're having to recoup money from player sales and prop up the club itself. Put Pele and Johann Cruyff on the board but if there's no money, there's no money.
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2011
  • #19
ajsccfc said:
I'm sure that was their original plan, but such plans need money and with crowds dwindling and the entire planet going into financial meltdown, their football expertise doesn't really bear much relevance when they're having to recoup money from player sales and prop up the club itself. Put Pele and Johann Cruyff on the board but if there's no money, there's no money.
Click to expand...

Well they did have money and they knew the score when they took us over. They lacked the bottle to see their plan through - ironic when you translate SISU from Finnish into English. I remain unconvinced, especially looking at the current board. Until they've gone we're going nowhere.

:blue:
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • May 7, 2011
  • #20
Truce please! This is an important day as we need a point for the play-offs and this isn't helping. We need to stand together on this
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • May 7, 2011
  • #21
rob9872 said:
Truce please! This is an important day as we need a point for the play-offs and this isn't helping. We need to stand together on this
Click to expand...

Well I'm glad my post provoked an interesting debate!

ps We're already in the play-offs - just need that point to secure a home second-leg semi-final......
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 7, 2011
  • #22
No truce needed! We weren't exactly arguing or screaming abuse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?