Plan A (or is it really Plan B?) is to build a new tin-pot stadium outside Coventry at a cost of £20m+. The interest on the borrowings at a modest 5% (if they're lucky with such a high risk venture and their track record) will be £1m p.a. If it's a 20 year loan, for example, then there is also another £1m of capital to repay each year)!
Fishers' original plan to fund the stadium construction with the development of retail/commercial/residential park (normal business practice?) appears to have been abandoned and it will, in fact, be just be a modest stadium with a "Fanszone". So the club's income will comprise just gate money, catering and merchandising, it seems. This will be from a much-reduced fan base as many (including myself) will refuse to go to a "home" stadium outside the city, particularly if it is owned by a SISUE company.
Plan B (we all know that this was really Plan A all along, don't we?) is to acquire the unencumbered freehold of the Ricoh site for next-to-nothing. Well, it's now clear that is not going to happen for reasons explained by AL and JS is well aware of them.
So, SISUE must surely be considering another possibility?
Plan C. Take up the Ricoh rent-free offer and negotiate to purchase the rights to the catering income. It will only be bloody-mindedness that will stop them from considering this possibility but anyone can see that this has to be a better option than Plan A for the future of CCFC, or even the anonymous Hedge Fund investors?
I think possibly your plan c was their plan a all along. They knew full well freehold was never for sale. It was all about getting as much as possible and next to no rent for a long time is a result in anyones book if your were ccfcs owners.
I think possibly your plan c was their plan a all along. They knew full well freehold was never for sale. It was all about getting as much as possible and next to no rent for a long time is a result in anyones book if your were ccfcs owners.
I posted such earlier. Take-over or merger with ACL and possibly the Compass contract gives them all they need.
No need for freehold, simply long leasehold, with low rents and access to revenues. Nobody can tell me why this wouldn't work. Which is frustrating when some sheepishly bleat on about the CCC 'intransigence' with regards the freehold being a deal breaker...
I posted such earlier. Take-over or merger with ACL and possibly the Compass contract gives them all they need.
No need for freehold, simply long leasehold, with low rents and access to revenues. Nobody can tell me why this wouldn't work. Which is frustrating when some sheepishly bleat on about the CCC 'intransigence' with regards the freehold being a deal breaker...
There is no plane A. (Tin pot alley) There is only the plan to gain access to the RICOH. I believe they are so strident in their actions as they have inadequate funds and need to bully a low price. But it isn't working and won't work. CCC just need to stand firm. The fans need to be together and united in believe of a better future.
Come on everyone, most of us know the SISU plan as spun by PR is Bull and what the real plan is. If we can unite again behind a common aim and cease the infighting and animosity between us fans, we will get to the promised land sooner. If that means SISU buying into the future at a sensible value, then OK, I go with that. They can then leave with some dignity. 'Dignity' - A characteristics they have denied the fans.
I think because they claim (SISU) that the running costs, outside of rent, so I mean match day "putting on the event" costs are greater than at Sixfields. This is dispelled surely by the difference in gate money, but I think this is what they inferred was the reason.
I think because they claim (SISU) that the running costs, outside of rent, so I mean match day "putting on the event" costs are greater than at Sixfields. This is dispelled surely by the difference in gate money, but I think this is what they inferred was the reason.