Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

We NEED to appeal that. (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter rylee
  • Start date Apr 22, 2024
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Next
First Prev 6 of 9 Next Last

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #176
Manchester_sky_blue said:
This

If the ref gives the goal, the linesman doesn't flag and the 4th official doesn't protest then there is absolutely no reason to go to VAR. It should only be called upon when an on-pitch official believes there might be something.
Click to expand...

But they do go to VAR and always check offsides
 
R

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #177
In Rugby. ref sez on field a try, any reason why I can't award it?? Here VAR microscopically picking each pixel apart to try and find a reason.
Fuck it let's stop all the niceties..................... they fucking cheated us!!!!
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #178
That Forest tweet was written by a complete head case. However I do think it was 3 stonewallers.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #179
bigfatronssba said:
Exactly that

Do we really want the final game of our season to be a hammering by Man City?
Click to expand...


No of course, but it helps the Bank Balance and the budget for next season.
 
C

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #180
What baffles with me is that even by their own graphic I can’t see that it’s offside. If it was an argument about “spirit of the rule” etc I’d say you’ve just what to take it in the chin but I can’t see how Wright is off.
 
Reactions: messiahrobins

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #181
Cally Fedora said:
What baffles with me is that even by their own graphic I can’t see that it’s offside. If it was an argument about “spirit of the rule” etc I’d say you’ve just what to take it in the chin but I can’t see how Wright is off.
Click to expand...

The only image where he might possibly be offside is that random VAR fan account on Twitter. And even then there’s questions about which frame he’s used and the lines he’s drawn.

Which is why it would be nice to get confirmation from the FA on exactly what image was used for the call.
 
Reactions: messiahrobins
G

gspotgaz

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #182
Another angle
 

Attachments

  • A486F030-E4BB-46FB-A051-2E996E39E3F6.jpeg
    256.4 KB · Views: 69
Reactions: B-Ban-Boogie

Kubrick

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #183
I've written more on one of the other threads about this. I'm surprised more of you don't know about yesterday's VAR official Michael Salisbury and the controversial mistakes he's made in the past. The PGMOL had previously dropped him and needed to apologise for his mistakes. This was the latest and highest profile.

Don't lose sleep looking at lines drawn on pitches or the offside rules. There's no conspiracy—just a lousy official who made the wrong call.
 
Reactions: rylee

Covcraig@bury

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #184
I’ve watched this over and over again and it’s onside . There’s something not quite right about this VAR decision and I know we all feel the same and sour grapes will spring to mind . But Doug King you need to appeal this it’s just not sited well with us all . I also hear NFFC have been asked to take their rant off X as the PL don’t like it . It’s fucking corrupt . The money the TV and PL make on the Manchester derby is all they’re interested in, so let’s spread the word through other forums to not watch the final . Fuck them
 
Reactions: messiahrobins
R

rylee

Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #185
Covcraig@bury said:
I’ve watched this over and over again and it’s onside . There’s something not quite right about this VAR decision and I know we all feel the same and sour grapes will spring to mind . But Doug King you need to appeal this it’s just not sited well with us all . I also hear NFFC have been asked to take their rant off X as the PL don’t like it . It’s fucking corrupt . The money the TV and PL make on the Manchester derby is all they’re interested in, so let’s spread the word through other forums to not watch the final . Fuck them
Click to expand...

With you on all of this.
 
Reactions: messiahrobins
M

messiahrobins

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #186
Tommo1993 said:
That Forest tweet was written by a complete head case. However I do think it was 3 stonewallers.
Click to expand...
The Forest tweet was magnificent. And even better they kept it up.
 
M

messiahrobins

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #187
jamboy said:
I've written more on one of the other threads about this. I'm surprised more of you don't know about yesterday's VAR official Michael Salisbury and the controversial mistakes he's made in the past. The PGMOL had previously dropped him and needed to apologise for his mistakes. This was the latest and highest profile.

Don't lose sleep looking at lines drawn on pitches or the offside rules. There's no conspiracy—just a lousy official who made the wrong call.
Click to expand...
it is corruption, and i dont get all the sudden snowflakes coming out saying there are concerns about the safety of these officials, thats utter bull shit just to try and deflect from obvious corruption.
 
M

messiahrobins

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #188
Covcraig@bury said:
I’ve watched this over and over again and it’s onside . There’s something not quite right about this VAR decision and I know we all feel the same and sour grapes will spring to mind . But Doug King you need to appeal this it’s just not sited well with us all . I also hear NFFC have been asked to take their rant off X as the PL don’t like it . It’s fucking corrupt . The money the TV and PL make on the Manchester derby is all they’re interested in, so let’s spread the word through other forums to not watch the final . Fuck them
Click to expand...
Spot on, fans need to put prrssure on the club to endorse Notting Forest's comments at minimum
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #189
messiahrobins said:
The Forest tweet was magnificent. And even better they kept it up.
Click to expand...

“…consider its options”

There are no options.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #190
It's all getting a bit mackemesque!
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #191
Worst yet

 
Reactions: rylee

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #192
Grendel said:
But they do go to VAR and always check offsides
Click to expand...
That needs to change. They obviously watch the game, but they don't need to micro analyse everything.

As I keep saying, yesterday was the perfect example and no-one can say anything other than it was impossible to say "onside or offside" on first viewing of that still, because it was so close. That close, don't go into detail to look at it in a flawed system that lacks accuracy and just go back to the ref.

Bottom line is, people can moan all they want, but VAR is here to stay, so we need to look at ways to make it better and work more efficiently.

It isn't working as it should as it stands
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and Sky Blue Pete

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #193
Tommo1993 said:
“…consider its options”

There are no options.
Click to expand...
yes there are, the fa and pgmol are not unaccountable
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #194
David O'Day said:
yes there are, the fa and pgmol are not unaccountable
Click to expand...
Fa and pgmol are two different organisations
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #195
Sky Blue Pete said:
Fa and pgmol are two different organisations
Click to expand...
yes and where have I said they are the same?

the "and" clearly implies that I am referring to 2 entities
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #196
David O'Day said:
yes and where have I said they are the same?

the "and" clearly implies that I am referring to 2 entities
Click to expand...
You ok hun
 
Reactions: Otis

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #197
David O'Day said:
yes there are, the fa and pgmol are not unaccountable
Click to expand...

So what’s the objective? For them to take liability and apologise?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #198
Sky Blue Pete said:
You ok hun
Click to expand...
Yeah? I don't appear to be the one that has misread something on the internet and is now trying to deflect instead of just saying "oh, sorry I was mistaken I can clearly see now you at no time said the FA and PGMOL were the same thing"
 

Kubrick

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #199
messiahrobins said:
it is corruption, and i dont get all the sudden snowflakes coming out saying there are concerns about the safety of these officials, thats utter bull shit just to try and deflect from obvious corruption.
Click to expand...

It's not ‘obvious corruption’, and I wouldn't draw attention to other mistakes Michael Salisbury has made if I thought it put his safety at risk. I'm highlighting that a human made the decision, and it could be a human error (not technology).

VAR checked all seven goals on Sunday, all given by the officials during the game. VAR officials check if we won it with the last kick of the game. They've looked, and it's unclear that it's on, so they haven't given it.

I'd favour the audio being shared, so everyone can move forward.
 
Reactions: Otis

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #200
jamboy said:
It's not ‘obvious corruption’, and I wouldn't draw attention to other mistakes Michael Salisbury has made if I thought it put his safety at risk. I'm highlighting that a human made the decision, and it could be a human error (not technology).

VAR checked all seven goals on Sunday, all given by the officials during the game. VAR officials check if we won it with the last kick of the game. They've looked, and it's unclear that it's on, so they haven't given it.

I'd favour the audio being shared, so everyone can move forward.
Click to expand...
If it is unclear then why have they changed the decision, on field was no offside?
 
Reactions: robbiethemole and Brighton Sky Blue
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #201
jamboy said:
It's not ‘obvious corruption’, and I wouldn't draw attention to other mistakes Michael Salisbury has made if I thought it put his safety at risk. I'm highlighting that a human made the decision, and it could be a human error (not technology).

VAR checked all seven goals on Sunday, all given by the officials during the game. VAR officials check if we won it with the last kick of the game. They've looked, and it's unclear that it's on, so they haven't given it.

I'd favour the audio being shared, so everyone can move forward.
Click to expand...
Bullshit is it unclear, they couldn’t wait to chalk it off.
 

Kubrick

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #202
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Bullshit is it unclear, they couldn’t wait to chalk it off.
Click to expand...
I celebrated it. I'm honest in saying it looked level and wasn't clearly on or off. The VAR decision was made quickly. It would now be good for the PGMOL to take time to review it, even if the result can't be changed.
 
Reactions: Otis
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #203
jamboy said:
I celebrated it. I'm honest in saying it looked level and wasn't clearly on or off. The VAR decision was made quickly. It would now be good for the PGMOL to take time to review it, even if the result can't be changed.
Click to expand...
Level is onside
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #204
jamboy said:
I celebrated it. I'm honest in saying it looked level and wasn't clearly on or off. The VAR decision was made quickly. It would now be good for the PGMOL to take time to review it, even if the result can't be changed.
Click to expand...
Then you say it looked onside? Level is onside remember?
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #205
What was the turnaround in time between goal and ruled out? Frustrating how they tried everything for Simms’ goal in the QF and this one they didn’t want to look in to
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

jordan210

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #206
The club need to appeal even if it’s just to get the Var audio and footage to put this to bed
 
Reactions: rylee
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #207
I've thought about this long and hard since VAR didn't go our way, should we appeal the decision on the day? No.

Let me explain why.

I think we can all agree on one thing, VAR, it’s not being utilised properly at the moment and therefore that makes it unfit for purpose.

What I don’t understand about VAR is the FA Cup is deemed the most magical competition in world football, in the earlier stages of the competition there was no VAR and there was magic, Maidstone being an example, having VAR in play once the Prem teams come in is just wrong and it gave Man Utd a massive advantage on Sunday.

Was it offside, debatable, but if Cov had won with that goal, no one could’ve complained and it would’ve been lauded as one of the best comebacks and magical moments in the history of the cup. People would’ve debated the goal retrospectively had it been given, but that’s what promotes opinion and debate about the game, that’s what people love.

VAR just ruined an absolutely magical moment. I think that’s the part I’m struggling with most, for 60 seconds I hugged complete strangers and was elated, the ref and lino never gave it offside, but an inconsistent piece of technology with less than 100% accuracy in application and evidence took that away.

The game needs passion, it needs talking points, it needs right and wrong calls. I would rather do off with VAR completely in the FA Cup and resign the history books to a loss, rather then the club appeal or seek the audio from VAR, because if it was established as the wrong call I could never accept a token statement for victory, it wouldn't change all the emotions I felt in that moment or since.

Do off with VAR, let's get the game back to how it was prior to VAR, the one that we all fell in love with.
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk, Skyblueweeman, Sick Boy and 2 others

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #208
RoboCCFC90 said:
I've thought about this long and hard since VAR didn't go our way, should we appeal the decision on the day? No.

Let me explain why.

I think we can all agree on one thing, VAR, it’s not being utilised properly at the moment and therefore that makes it unfit for purpose.

What I don’t understand about VAR is the FA Cup is deemed the most magical competition in world football, in the earlier stages of the competition there was no VAR and there was magic, Maidstone being an example, having VAR in play once the Prem teams come in is just wrong and it gave Man Utd a massive advantage on Sunday.

Was it offside, debatable, but if Cov had won with that goal, no one could’ve complained and it would’ve been lauded as one of the best comebacks and magical moments in the history of the cup. People would’ve debated the goal retrospectively had it been given, but that’s what promotes opinion and debate about the game, that’s what people love.

VAR just ruined an absolutely magical moment. I think that’s the part I’m struggling with most, for 60 seconds I hugged complete strangers and was elated, the ref and lino never gave it offside, but an inconsistent piece of technology with less than 100% accuracy in application and evidence took that away.

The game needs passion, it needs talking points, it needs right and wrong calls. I would rather do off with VAR completely in the FA Cup and resign the history books to a loss, rather then the club appeal or seek the audio from VAR, because if it was established as the wrong call I could never accept a token statement for victory, it wouldn't change all the emotions I felt in that moment or since.

Do off with VAR, let's get the game back to how it was prior to VAR, the one that we all fell in love with.
Click to expand...
I think it is a very valid point re VAR and the FA Cup. You either have it, or you don't. I don't see it at all fair to not be available until a Premier League side is involved a few rounds into the competition.

Fine, have it for Premier League, because then there is consistency there, but you can't have it for some rounds of the FA Cup and then not for others. Just doesn't sit right.
 
Reactions: Manchester_sky_blue, Sky_Blue_Dreamer, shmmeee and 4 others
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #209
Otis said:
I think it is a very valid point re VAR and the FA Cup. You either have it, or you don't. I don't see it at all fair to not be available until a Premier League side is involved a few rounds into the competition.

Fine, have it for Premier League, because then there is consistency there, but you can't have it for some rounds of the FA Cup and then not for others. Just doesn't sit right.
Click to expand...
There’s no issue with certain FA Cup games having different levels of technology available at different levels of the tournament - that’s just a reality of the football pyramid, so long as you’re playing by the same rules it’s fine.

By saying that VAR should be used always or not at all, you’re kind of tacitly admitting that VAR is bending the rules of football itself. The whole thing needs to be scrapped, it’s just not achieving what it was meant to do.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #210
SBT said:
There’s no issue with certain FA Cup games having different levels of technology available at different levels of the tournament - that’s just a reality of the football pyramid, so long as you’re playing by the same rules it’s fine.

By saying that VAR should be used always or not at all, you’re kind of tacitly admitting that VAR is bending the rules of football itself. The whole thing needs to be scrapped, it’s just not achieving what it was meant to do.
Click to expand...

But there is, for instance Team A has a goal chalked off for offside in R1, but was actually onside, under the new rules there are no replays, etc. Team A from National League misses out on much needed revenues and exposure. No VAR was able to intervene.

Fast forward to Sunday, the same scenario, City were denied a goal, of which there is huge doubt as to the offside call from VAR, add to this it was given as a goal by the on field official.

Unless VAR is 100% accurate, which we know it not to be, it should not be available in the qualifying rounds, earlier stages or the final.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Next
First Prev 6 of 9 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?