Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

We have to pay acl £24m for revenue rights (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date Feb 16, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #71
Nelllist lost his seat in 2012. Wiki says he works at CAB.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #72
Jack Griffin said:
Nelllist lost his seat in 2012. Wiki says he works at CAB.
Click to expand...

I'm well aware, but that wasn't my point.

Note: I said 'had', past tense...
 

Wrenstreetcarpark

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #73
Grendel said:
The journalist did not say it was in the current negotiations.
Click to expand...

and you would know because you sleep with him, eat with him and write with him.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #74
Wrenstreetcarpark said:
and you would know because you sleep with him, eat with him and write with him.
Click to expand...

A typically mature response from someone who seems far more interested in the council than the club and no doubt was less interested in Southampton Harry shaw the inland revenue etc
 

Wrenstreetcarpark

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #75
Come on now Neil, fess up.
 
G

giveusagoal

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #76
AFCCOVENTRY said:
That is the real problem. We are being held to ransom by acl and the council on this.

The wonderful previous regime of McGinity at co sold our revenue stream rights to acl for £6m.

Now if CCFC want revenue streams back we have to pay £24m for it.
Click to expand...

What is your source for this information?

Am sure Fisher and Sisu would be shouting about it if it was true - all i heard fisher moan about yesterday was not having seen the accounts for the pies.
 
G

giveusagoal

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #77
AFCCOVENTRY said:
There's a difference on agreeing the stadium rent... Even fisher said that's fine.

It's the revenue stream which we are being held to ransom about.

Listen to all the interviews again and it becomes more obvious.

Acl refuse an outside expert like Deloittes to get involved? Why is that?
Click to expand...

Hmmm deloittes - they used to sign off the accounts for a company called Welcome Finance - it later turned out that there was a £750 million black hole in Welcomes accounts - the CEO and most Welcomes directors had to go - some have been banned and fined.

With accountancey skills like that you can see why SISU would like them involved
 
G

giveusagoal

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #78
Grendel said:
An independent journalist who often writes articles about the club in the daily mail.
Click to expand...

And this perosns name?

Why has he not written an article on this?
 
G

giveusagoal

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #79
AFCCOVENTRY said:
I'm afraid that's not the whole story Jan.

Acl are refusing to give CCFC access to the other revenue streams full stop.

The club cannot compete wage wise next season on food and beverage which is hardly anything.

Acl have told Sisu they have to pay £24m of they want it. Acl don't want the club to have anymore and put a premium on it for the privilege.

Acl are the council. Those board members are all ex Cov council people.
Click to expand...

ACL has 5 board members - 2 are employed by the council, as the council owns half of ACL that makes sense - the other 3 are not from the council - can you provide evidence please that they are "ex Cov Council" ?
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #80
giveusagoal said:
ACL has 5 board members - 2 are employed by the council, as the council owns half of ACL that makes sense - the other 3 are not from the council - can you provide evidence please that they are "ex Cov Council" ?
Click to expand...

No just more BS
 
G

giveusagoal

New Member
  • Feb 17, 2013
  • #81
ashbyjan said:
Have just spoken to Tim Fisher and he has told me that this number was one that was proposed by Daniel Gidney many months ago and has formed no part of the current negotiations. It was a number that obviously was dismissed out of hand by the club and has never been mentioned again by either party so it is really a red herring.
Clarified?
Click to expand...

Thank you Jan.

I wish i had read this post before wasting my time replying to nonsense
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?