Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

'We felt it was difficult to conclude on a long-term arrangement' - Wasps pull out of Ricoh Arena ta (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter armybike
  • Start date Jun 2, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5

colin101

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #141
Wasps say they have stopped discussions re long term deal for CCFC to play at Ricoh, yet a couple of weeks ago Anderson was talking up CCFC moving to the Butts.

The question is where did (does) Anderson want as CCFC'S home for the foreseeable future?.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #142
We all want the legal crap to stop. It won't benefit our club in any way. And it has looked like being a waste of time from the start.

But it certainly looks dodgy to me.

Why even start talks if they don't want to come to an agreement if there are legal cases going on?

Only background noise and it doesn't mean that it will stop an agreement but is given as a reason to stop talks?

And on top of this it looks like our academy is losing it's home at the same time whilst saying a deal might still be done.

All smells like bullshit to me. But I have a feeling that there is more to it than anyone is saying. Is it anything to do with the Butts idea? Things have moved on quickly since it was announced recently. I can see the headline already. 'We offered CCFC a long term agreement but.....'

The end of playing at the Ricoh could be closer than most think. And would it be a surprise if we were turned down for the Butts? I never went to Northampton. But if we are more or less forced out I would follow my football club to where we end up this time. And I would do so for as long as it looks like they are trying to move us back to where we should be.
 
Reactions: The Penguin

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #143
Astute said:
We all want the legal crap to stop. It won't benefit our club in any way. And it has looked like being a waste of time from the start.

But it certainly looks dodgy to me.

Why even start talks if they don't want to come to an agreement if there are legal cases going on?

Only background noise and it doesn't mean that it will stop an agreement but is given as a reason to stop talks?

And on top of this it looks like our academy is losing it's home at the same time whilst saying a deal might still be done.

All smells like bullshit to me. But I have a feeling that there is more to it than anyone is saying. Is it anything to do with the Butts idea? Things have moved on quickly since it was announced recently. I can see the headline already. 'We offered CCFC a long term agreement but.....'

The end of playing at the Ricoh could be closer than most think. And would it be a surprise if we were turned down for the Butts? I never went to Northampton. But if we are more or less forced out I would follow my football club to where we end up this time. And I would do so for as long as it looks like they are trying to move us back to where we should be.
Click to expand...

Unless something has happened regarding JR2.

Like you say though, they knew about this when they started the negotiations as did the Higgs.

Higgs / Wasps and the council have obviously been working on stuff behind the scenes for the training ground etc.
 
S

SkyBlueHomer

New Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #144
Any idea what the football league's position will be regarding this latest development?
I'd be very suprised if they just sit around waiting for the remaining time to tick down. Hopefully they could intervene & help sort this mess out but what guarantee's do they need/time frame before (worst case scenario) we have our membership withdrawn if we cant prove we have somewhere to play in a couple of season's
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #145
Not read all the threads but you can't blame Wasps stopping the talks, we all know sisu legislate at the drop of a hat why would someone put themselves in jeopardy of that. Unfortunately Wasps hold the cards and don't make fortunes out of CCFC renting their ground and that unfortunately is what the Ricoh is, their ground.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #146
rupert_bear said:
Not read all the threads but you can't blame Wasps stopping the talks, we all know sisu legislate at the drop of a hat why would someone put themselves in jeopardy of that. Unfortunately Wasps hold the cards and don't make fortunes out of CCFC renting their ground and that unfortunately is what the Ricoh is, their ground.
Click to expand...

Wasps have made an offer for the club to stay so legal action is irrelevant.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #147
Nick said:
Unless something has happened regarding JR2.

Like you say though, they knew about this when they started the negotiations as did the Higgs.

Higgs / Wasps and the council have obviously been working on stuff behind the scenes for the training ground etc.
Click to expand...
But what are the chances of new negotiations stopping suddenly because of legal action that has been going for years that they even admit do not involve them?
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #148
Astute said:
But what are the chances of new negotiations stopping suddenly because of legal action that has been going for years that they even admit do not involve them?
Click to expand...

The discussions between CA and Wasps suggested that although they were civil, there were sticking points in regards to what each party wants/is prepared to offer.

It may be that these points are not going to be resolved - so from a Wasps perspective, they have a free pass by dropping in the 'background legal noise' excuse to stop discussions. Even though they are irrelevant to any discussions.

My concern is we get to April next year, nothing is resolved and suddenly we get a take it or leave it offer that is not beneficial to CCFC whatsoever. Then look who's fault it becomes if we don't just accept it.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #149
colin101 said:
Wasps say they have stopped discussions re long term deal for CCFC to play at Ricoh, yet a couple of weeks ago Anderson was talking up CCFC moving to the Butts.

The question is where did (does) Anderson want as CCFC'S home for the foreseeable future?.
Click to expand...
if he's doing his job properly then surely he wants the best option for CCFC?
 

colin101

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #150
clint van damme said:
if he's doing his job properly then surely he wants the best option for CCFC?
Click to expand...
Clint, I understand he wants the best option, however what is the best option, because how can you negotiate a long term deal at the Ricoh whilst telling everyone your preference is to move to the Butts.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #151
colin101 said:
Clint, I understand he wants the best option, however what is the best option, because how can you negotiate a long term deal at the Ricoh whilst telling everyone your preference is to move to the Butts.
Click to expand...

Think he's just keeping his options open, but let's be honest, does anyone think SISU are going to invest the cash required to develop the Butts, (or any other site for that matter), I have my doubts.
 
Reactions: Captain Dart

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #152
It's pretty clear to me. The Wasps and the Council are hand in glove here. There's no threat to Wasps from JR1 or JR2 because the Ricoh deal can't be unwound now it's all been paid for, but the Council clearly is at risk (even if it's seemingly a pretty low risk).

Wasps want planning permission and a smooth transition for the Higgs purchase (and publicly funded PR like the City of Rugby bullshit), something the Council can provide. The Council want an end to the legal action, and ideally rid of SISU. Join the dots.

Neither of them give a sh*t about the impact on the club. As skybluetony said elswhere - if you're a CCFC fan, and you're spending money at Wasps, you might want to think again.

NW is bang on - this is bullying, plain and simple.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #153
Astute said:
But what are the chances of new negotiations stopping suddenly because of legal action that has been going for years that they even admit do not involve them?
Click to expand...
Surely any party wouldn't continue with such a lengthy legal process unless they think they have a chance of success, the costs alone would dictate this. We all think it's pointless but they clearly don't!
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #154
Astute said:
We all want the legal crap to stop. It won't benefit our club in any way. And it has looked like being a waste of time from the start.

But it certainly looks dodgy to me.

Why even start talks if they don't want to come to an agreement if there are legal cases going on?

Only background noise and it doesn't mean that it will stop an agreement but is given as a reason to stop talks?
Click to expand...

The matters at court were coming to ahead during the timeframe it would appear the negotiations were ongoing between SISU/Wasps and again CCC were not found to be at fault.

However SISU have decided to continue with the matters and progress to a further appeal.

They had the option to draw a line under the matter, but decided only last week to move matters to the Supreme Court.

Wasps have said talks will be put on hold until the court matters are finalised.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #155
duffer said:
It's pretty clear to me. The Wasps and the Council are hand in glove here. There's no threat to Wasps from JR1 or JR2 because the Ricoh deal can't be unwound now it's all been paid for, but the Council clearly is at risk (even if it's seemingly a pretty low risk).

Wasps want planning permission and a smooth transition for the Higgs purchase (and publicly funded PR like the City of Rugby bullshit), something the Council can provide. The Council want an end to the legal action, and ideally rid of SISU. Join the dots.

Neither of them give a sh*t about the impact on the club. As skybluetony said elswhere - if you're a CCFC fan, and you're spending money at Wasps, you might want to think again.

NW is bang on - this is bullying, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

I want the sale of the Ricoh to Wasps to be scrutinised properly (in the absence of any transparency from the public authority). Therefore, bring on JR2.
 
Reactions: duffer

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #156
Grendel said:
Wasps have made an offer for the club to stay so legal action is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

What was the offer?
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #157
armybike said:
The matters at court were coming to ahead during the timeframe it would appear the negotiations were ongoing between SISU/Wasps and again CCC were not found to be at fault.

However SISU have decided to continue with the matters and progress to a further appeal.

They had the option to draw a line under the matter, but decided only last week to move matters to the Supreme Court.

Wasps have said talks will be put on hold until the court matters are finalised.
Click to expand...

Why - when it impacts Wasps not a jot? Who are they, you or anyone else to deny someone their right to pursue matters through the court just because your opinion is that they're wrong.

SISU will eventually exhaust all legal avenues, though it may yet take a few more years. It's likely going to cost them a lot of money, but it's their money not ours - and just maybe they will show something illegal from the council in all this (though I have my doubts).

Regardless, the club has to stand on its own two feet in the meantime anyway, unless we can attract a billionaire somehow...
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #158
fernandopartridge said:
I want the sale of the Ricoh to Wasps to be scrutinised properly (in the absence of any transparency from the public authority). Therefore, bring on JR2.
Click to expand...

I can't see how JR2 is going to do anything. Legally as far as anyone can tell there is no proceedure from central goverment on the selling of a council asset such as a half share in a management company. The only way JR2 would have any legal merit as far as I can tell is if they had sold the freehold as there are proceedure's set on this from central goverment that have to be stricktly adhered to and CCC didn't sell the freehold. Personally I'd be suprised if it ever got to a courtroom for a full hearing. It seems even more half assed than JR1 to me and we all know how that's working out.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #159
fernandopartridge said:
I want the sale of the Ricoh to Wasps to be scrutinised properly (in the absence of any transparency from the public authority). Therefore, bring on JR2.
Click to expand...
What do you mean by scrutinised properly? It has been looked at a few times now by different judges. And nothing unlawful has been found. And we all know that it was immorally wrong already.
 
Reactions: Kingokings204

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #160
colin101 said:
Wasps say they have stopped discussions re long term deal for CCFC to play at Ricoh, yet a couple of weeks ago Anderson was talking up CCFC moving to the Butts.

The question is where did (does) Anderson want as CCFC'S home for the foreseeable future?.
Click to expand...
Obviously we need to have more than one option so no surprise he was talking it up.

It is an interesting question, with talk of a 20-25 year Ricoh deal yesterday before talks broke down is the Ricoh or Butts Anderson's first choice
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #161
Astute said:
What do you mean by scrutinised properly? It has been looked at a few times now by different judges. And nothing unlawful has been found. And we all know that it was immorally wrong already.
Click to expand...
The judges haven't looked at the deal with Wasps. They looked at events that took place during 2012 predominantly.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #162
Astute said:
What do you mean by scrutinised properly? It has been looked at a few times now by different judges. And nothing unlawful has been found. And we all know that it was immorally wrong already.
Click to expand...

I'm not aware that the sale of the Ricoh to Wasps was the central plank of JR1, so I don't think that has been fully looked at yet. That's to come in JR2!
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #163
stupot07 said:
What a crock of shit.

We're being gang banged by higgs, CSF, CCC, wasps.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Of course SISU are squeaky clean too :angelic:
 
Reactions: armybike

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #164
duffer said:
I'm not aware that the sale of the Ricoh to Wasps was the central plank of JR1, so I don't think that has been fully looked at yet. That's to come in JR2!
Click to expand...

Although, perhaps the Wasps deal was background noise to JR1, why was it that the council got cold feet about the deal to distress the YB mortgage? It never was explained.......
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #165
fernandopartridge said:
Although, perhaps the Wasps deal was background noise to JR1, why was it that the council got cold feet about the deal to distress the YB mortgage? It never was explained.......
Click to expand...

I thought that in the original JR the judge ruled that plan to distress the YB mortgage and get a knockdown settlement wasn't feasable as the YB wasn't willing to accept a reduced settlement and this rulling was upheld in the appeal? If thats the case isn't it truer to say that no one got cold feet the plan just failed. Who's to say that SISU didn't then get cold feet after the failure of this plan leaving the council to bail out ACL on their own? All supposition I know but just as likely, possibly more given the way the judgement went.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #166
fernandopartridge said:
The judges haven't looked at the deal with Wasps. They looked at events that took place during 2012 predominantly.
Click to expand...
It has been ruled that there wasn't a problem legally by not selling to SISU as both sides didn't look at making a deal within the timespan. So how could there be a problem with selling to someone else? The owners wanted to sell and the buyer wanted to buy. And being an immoral sale doesn't come into it. SISU acting immorally didn't come into anything.
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #167
duffer said:
Why - when it impacts Wasps not a jot? Who are they, you or anyone else to deny someone their right to pursue matters through the court just because your opinion is that they're wrong.

SISU will eventually exhaust all legal avenues, though it may yet take a few more years. It's likely going to cost them a lot of money, but it's their money not ours - and just maybe they will show something illegal from the council in all this (though I have my doubts).

Regardless, the club has to stand on its own two feet in the meantime anyway, unless we can attract a billionaire somehow...
Click to expand...

OK, you'll have to help me out on this one - where have I said SISU shouldn't pursue this through the courts? I think it's utter ridiculous but again, where have I said they shouldn't?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #168
Sky Blue Kid said:
Of course SISU are squeaky clean too :angelic:
Click to expand...
No, they are not squeeky clean, sisu have done lots of shitty things and continue to do so and have played a major part in all this. But when they have gone our club will be fucked for a long time after this shafting wasps, CCC, higgs and CSF are giving us.

We could 100% focus on blaming sisu and let wasps, CCC, higgs, and CSF contribute in destroying us, or we can challenge them all including sisu.

We should be united on this.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Astute

mattylad

Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #169
SISU were always going to go as far as the European court, it has always been their only true chance of winning the case they have put forward. I imagine that those on the Wasps side just got fed up/bored with all the crap floating around about the Butts, the Academy etc and have decided to push the situation to a finish. Not nice that the football club is again piggy in the middle and I now await TF to pop out the woodwork with rhetoric of a magical new stadium built on a cloud in the sky with a state of the art training and academy facility on the neighboring cloud all harnessed by Unicorns so they can be dragged over to Northampton at the whim of SISU :-(
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #170
stupot07 said:
No, they are not squeeky clean, sisu have done lots of shitty things and continue to do so and have played a major part in all this. But when they have gone our club will be fucked for a long time after this shafting wasps, CCC, higgs and CSF are giving us.

We could 100% focus on blaming sisu and let wasps, CCC, higgs, and CSF contribute in destroying us, or we can challenge them all including sisu.

We should be united on this.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Glad you added that little caveat mate
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #171
martcov said:
Side note. The pin in your avatar.. Ireland in a sky blue sea.... I had that ( one of them ) - I wore it at a press evening I was at ( to do with Ireland). A journalist wanted to buy it, but I refused to sell it... And when I got up and left my jacket, he took the opportunity to steal it. I never saw him or my badge again. Small incident, but it pissed me off.
Click to expand...

Hope he wasn't Irish or Sky Blue. As you probably know, this is the badge for the CCFC supporters club in Ireland.
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #172
Irish Sky Blue said:
Hope he wasn't Irish or Sky Blue. As you probably know, this is the badge for the CCFC supporters club in Ireland.
Click to expand...

Yes, I bought it off you guys in 1997. I was proud of it, especially when I was working on an Irish stand...
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #173
What is very worrying is that Wasps have so much confidence in their position for Armstrong to give an interview like that. Does not bode well for the future of CCFC
 
Reactions: stupot07
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?