shelby76
Well-Known Member
What can sisu do? There getting slapped up left right and centre this fight is down to the fans, this lot are hoping we blame sisu wake up everybody.
What can sisu do? There getting slapped up left right and centre this fight is down to the fans, this lot are hoping we blame sisu wake up everybody.Obviously the ball is in Sisu's court.
History shows though to expect the worst.
And it must be really hard to get a fair deal when bullied and blackmailed into accepting anything.
The legal action is a red herring. We shouldn't allow it to become that red herring. Wrt the legal action, what will be will be.
And it must be really hard to get a fair deal when bullied and blackmailed into accepting anything.
The legal action is a red herring. We shouldn't allow it to become that red herring. Wrt the legal action, what will be will be.
Purely my opinion but at some point SISU will walk. Most probable way they will do that is to place us into administration.What do you see as the "end game" Admin?
Genuine question
I partly agree, but the legal action is not just a red herring. Sisu seemingly make enemies all over the place and let's face it they are not liked and also not at all trusted.
I do think that has some bearing here. CCC most certainly didn't trust them at all and still don't I would suspect.
Not saying anyone is trustworthy in this whole sorry mess of course, but this a company that is disliked and therefore I think the legal action issue is relevant.
Purely my opinion but at some point SISU will walk. Most probable way they will do that is to place us into administration.
On the bright side we don't have much in the way of assets for any asset stripping.
Problem is who will bid to take us out of admin? You're talking about a club that will have no ground, be on the verge of being kicked out of the ground they rent and no academy. Why on earth would anyone see that as a good purchase?
It's only relevant if they (and we) allow it to be.
Why get sidetracked into issues which are ultimately irrelevant. Even the Wasps bloke says it's none of his business!
But then as a company would you want to be doing business with people like that and would you trust doing business with a company like that.
I do believe it has some relevance, though I can fully understand what you are saying and I respect that.
I could also say I wouldn't trust a business who made promises to move to London, and stay in Wycombe, but ultimately shafted its main customer base by going behind their back and moving their club (an unheard of thing in this country) and making sure everything was done in secret, away from inquisitive eyes.
But then we'd be going round in circles over who is right, and who is wrong.
The legal bit has been chucked in there for a reason. Don't fall for it and allow pressure there to distract from the main issues. To do so would be the height of stupidity.
Which is what leads me to believe CCC are behind this, he says discussions were going well and its none of his business. Then after the latest appeal they stop talks saying it is a distraction.It's only relevant if they (and we) allow it to be.
Why get sidetracked into issues which are ultimately irrelevant. Even the Wasps bloke says it's none of his business!
Which is what leads me to believe CCC are behind this, he says discussions were going well and its none of his business. Then after the latest appeal they stop talks saying it is a distraction.
Thing is NW, we can criticise Wasps all we want. They hold all the cards at the moment.
Only if we let them.
It should have started by not making them out as hero's when they moved, if they hadn't been welcomed with open arms would it have happened?Any how do we not let them?
You want us to move to the Butts now with a capacity of 1,500 or whatever it is?
At the moment Wasps hold all the cards. Until we have somewhere else to play that will be the case.
It should have started by not making them out as hero's when they moved, if they hadn't been welcomed with open arms would it have happened?
Any how do we not let them?
You want us to move to the Butts now with a capacity of 1,500 or whatever it is?
At the moment Wasps hold all the cards. Until we have somewhere else to play that will be the case.
Well firstly it could start to change now, I doubt it.Yeah, but that is retrospective now.
What should have happened doesn't really help us at all now does it.
Purely my opinion but at some point SISU will walk. Most probable way they will do that is to place us into administration.
On the bright side we don't have much in the way of assets for any asset stripping.
Problem is who will bid to take us out of admin? You're talking about a club that will have no ground, be on the verge of being kicked out of the ground they rent and no academy. Why on earth would anyone see that as a good purchase?
Nothing to do with JR2?Which is what leads me to believe CCC are behind this, he says discussions were going well and its none of his business. Then after the latest appeal they stop talks saying it is a distraction.
It seems that It's not only me and a few thousand others(Inc Wasps) that still see SISU and CCFC as "One entity"Simple answer is to ignore legal action, as it's SISU taking it, and not CCFC.
I doubt Wasps are worried about that, he describes it as background noise.N
Nothing to do with JR2?
Exactly Wingy... JR 1 is still ongoingN
Nothing to do with JR2?
I partly agree, but the legal action is not just a red herring. Sisu seemingly make enemies all over the place and let's face it they are not liked and also not at all trusted.
I do think that has some bearing here. CCC most certainly didn't trust them at all and still don't I would suspect.
Not saying anyone is trustworthy in this whole sorry mess of course, but this a company that is disliked and therefore I think the legal action issue is relevant.
It's all good. Otis is winning the Euromillions tomorrow night. Mrs Otis isn't seeing a penny and once this is all blown over, the memorial walls at the Ricoh are going to see all those names replaced by Otis' one liners.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
There are a lot of positives in his statement. They have agreed on two thirds of the 17 points but have now reached a point where they need to wait for the legal action to finish and they can start again on the other third.
We have 2 years to get this done and they can start again where they left off.
I have always said the Legals would get in the way. To be honest I didn't think they would get so much done.
Nothing like "Splitting hairs" is there stupot07No they haven't, they said they were half to 2/3rs through the list,
“We still had some points not agreed, but we agreed some of the key points for example how to make food and beverage work from their point of view, how hospitality would work, where to locate a club shop in the stadium - all those sort of things were agreed.
For all we know this could be PR bollocks. You'll swallow it though.
Let's wait for andersons response before whacking one out
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It seems as though Anderson and Wasps were a long way down a road to an agreement. Yet again another city executive has the rug pulled from under their feet by antics higher up in SISU. It is understandable SISU persistence in legal action has grounded the deal.
Hopefully this is a temporary problem and things can get back on track sometime in the future.
Ideal distressed purchase for a hedge fund with a track record of moving clubs...
Anderson said thisNothing like "Splitting hairs" is there stupot07
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?