Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

WC of CCFC Kits (Group H) (3 Viewers)

  • Thread starter skybluelee
  • Start date Yesterday at 6:55 AM
Forums New posts

Group H

  • 98/99

    Votes: 54 49.1%
  • 02/03

    Votes: 11 10.0%
  • 15/16

    Votes: 5 4.5%
  • 22/23

    Votes: 37 33.6%
  • 09/10

    Votes: 3 2.7%

  • Total voters
    110
  • This poll will close: Tomorrow at 6:55 AM.

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:55 AM
  • #1
The final group is here.

98/99
02/03
15/16
22/23
09/10

 
Reactions: skybluepm2

Razzle Dazzle Dean Gordon

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 8:06 AM
  • #2
Gone 98/99 on pure nostalgia i think. Not even sure i like the design all that much but I associate it with great players and being young! Subaru was a great sponsor too.
 
Reactions: Domo and AOM

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 8:19 AM
  • #3
I'm not a fan of 98/99. It was made with the sweatiest material known to science and the back had that circle that made it look odd if you didn't get a number printed so I got Huckerby on it just in time for us to sell him.
 
Reactions: AOM and Terry_dactyl

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 8:27 AM
  • #4
22/23, although the aesthetic is ruined by having plain shorts.
 

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 8:38 AM
  • #5
This is the first group where I genuinely don't like any of them. Despite my dislike of stripes I might go for 15/16 as it was the kit worn when my girls were mascots for the first time. Quite liked the material on that shirt.
 
Reactions: torchomatic

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 8:44 AM
  • #6
torchomatic said:
22/23, although the aesthetic is ruined by having plain shorts.
Click to expand...
I think the crappy betting sponsor going across the tramlines takes a bit away from the shirt too. Its close to being a superb kit.
 
Reactions: torchomatic

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 9:56 AM
  • #7
Would've gone 22/23:but no point as it won't beat its original so gone for the 98/99
 
Reactions: eastwoodsdustman

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:37 AM
  • #8
98/99 is a quality shirt however that 22/23 shirt was another Hummel beauty its up there with this seasons and 19/20s in the modern era
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:41 AM
  • #9
Most difficult group.
 

JimmyHillsbeard

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:12 AM
  • #10
Every one of those kits is flawed and wouldn’t get out of other groups here.

The LeCoq kit was awful material (with see thru meshy bits at the side and the big circle on the back that made it look like someone bending over to tie up their shoelaces if you didn’t pay extra for a number).

The two blue shorts kits felt a bit generic (odd as we made the Subaru version ourselves). The Cassidy logo peeled off most versions of the other shirt within weeks of purchase.

The Nike kit under Mowbray looked great from the front but had a big skyblue patch on the back that again meant that you needed to buy a number on the back for it to look ok.

The tramlines revival (which I voted for) has three faults - one the central badge (never a good idea); two the shorts should have had the same pattern; three the body shaming sponsor was different according to the size of shirt, for some larger kits the Boyle sports logo disappeared into the central reservation, for smaller sizes it spilled out over the stripes.
 
Reactions: skybluelee

SkyBlueSoul

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:23 AM
  • #11
98/99 for nostalgia, I was 7/8 and really starting to get into it. The others are just a big load of 'meh'
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:13 PM
  • #12
I don't understand why that 98/99 one is popular, awful at the time and looks even worse thesedays
 
Reactions: skybluelee and JimmyHillsbeard

AOM

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:35 PM
  • #13
Didn't the fans vote for 09/10 one from a choice of a few at the time?
It looks quite nice in the concept, but the final version wasn't great. Weird sizing as well, was almost square
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 2:13 PM

AOM

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:36 PM
  • #14
Razzle Dazzle Dean Gordon said:
Gone 98/99 on pure nostalgia i think. Not even sure i like the design all that much but I associate it with great players and being young! Subaru was a great sponsor too.
Click to expand...

Same, my first ever Coventry kit
 

JimmyHillsbeard

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:37 PM
  • #15
AOM said:
Same, my first ever Coventry kit
Click to expand...

Tell me the back doesn’t look like someone bending over to tie their shoe laces….

 
Reactions: AOM and skybluelee
C

CovRes

Member
  • Yesterday at 2:41 PM
  • #16
JimmyHillsbeard said:
Tell me the back doesn’t look like someone bending over to tie their shoe laces….

View attachment 43858
Click to expand...
I've seen it claimed it was meant to be the back of an elephant. Which would only come close to working if the shirt is tucked in to shorten the legs.
 
Reactions: JimmyHillsbeard
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Johnnythespider1 minute ago
Total: 4 (members: 1, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?