skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Do you have any questions to ask of CCFC's owners about CCFC?
And sadly they still vote her and cohorts back in power
Some people on here have clearly not looked in to WASPS history and patronage and perhaps they should
Have we seen WASPS plan that was put to ( our? ) Council that facilitated the hurried deal?
Has any one heard that in fact WASPS have actually paid in full for their deal?
The reason for the hurried deal was because CCC thought they were heading into Court by the end of October and wanted to cut SISU off at the pass
There is a lot of PR hype being put about and being supported by CCC - but let us have facts
Lucas said they would not have agreed to the deal if it impacted on CCC and CRFC - how can she distance herself if she is to ensure that does not happen
So many questions and no answers
What length of time are you classing as hurried, the deal will have taken months to sort out, probably since Lucas invited offers at the end of 2013.
Which part of the deal do you think that Wasps haven't paid for?
Why would selling cut SISU off at the pass? The legal action doesn't change does it?
It would be lovely to have some more facts around, you'd probably ignore them though.
So Lucas is lying when she stated the deal was first discussed in July?
Interesting that Ann Lucas said today on the radio that Wasps made contact for the first time in July.
I think it was the TV interview that I saw and heard for myself, and she quite clearly said that she met them in July for the first time, and this was after officers had already met them and were of the opinion that it was a serious offer.
Maybe she forgot her lines? She did say they made contact on the radio. I think it was around the time it was all confirmed and they were doing the unveil at the Ricoh.
................................................................................................................What length of time are you classing as hurried, the deal will have taken months to sort out, probably since Lucas invited offers at the end of 2013.
Which part of the deal do you think that Wasps haven't paid for?
Why would selling cut SISU off at the pass? The legal action doesn't change does it?
It would be lovely to have some more facts around, you'd probably ignore them though.
So Lucas is lying when she stated the deal was first discussed in July?
................................................................................................................
WASPS were discussing with CCC as you say 2 years ago - common knowledge
I simply asked "Has any one heard that in fact WASPS have actually paid in full for their deal?" - I assume you haven't? When CCC are asked they say "Commercial Confidentiality" but surely if WASPS had paid for what they have bought that would be standard practice and they would say "yes". What is confidential about acknowledging payment has been made - unless it hasn't
If the loan was repaid and replaced - the Court would probably say any error has been rectified so no need for further action unless CCC had suffered any loss
If you want quotable facts then ask for them on Monday or ask your local councillor - I look forward to seeing the responses
Rugby circles knew 2 years ago they were looking at the Ricoh
The deal as agreed may only have been discussed in July - so not an untruth but what went on before?
Is that allowed for the council to receive full payment of a loan and then lend it straight back to the people that just paid it off?
................................................................................................................
WASPS were discussing with CCC as you say 2 years ago - common knowledge
I simply asked "Has any one heard that in fact WASPS have actually paid in full for their deal?" - I assume you haven't? When CCC are asked they say "Commercial Confidentiality" but surely if WASPS had paid for what they have bought that would be standard practice and they would say "yes". What is confidential about acknowledging payment has been made - unless it hasn't
If the loan was repaid and replaced - the Court would probably say any error has been rectified so no need for further action unless CCC had suffered any loss
If you want quotable facts then ask for them on Monday or ask your local councillor - I look forward to seeing the responses
Is that allowed for the council to receive full payment of a loan and then lend it straight back to the people that just paid it off?
I didn't say two years, I said I thought the dates may link in to when the Council said they wanted to hear offers from interested parties, that was the end of 2013, so around 12 months. Neither timescale would tally with your suggestion of a hurried deal though.
Maybe I misread what I thought was emphasis when you wrote 'paid in full', as the conspiracy theory you were peddling the other day was suggesting not being paid at all. So, apologies if I misread any emphasis.
I'm pretty sure you can't rectify a wrong in law by simply reversing the action years later. I doubt any mention of wasps coming in will be taken into account by any judges deciding whether an appeal can progress.
Councils lend money to local business's all the time using this same central goverment pot, it doesn't need to be a company that the council own an interest in to recive this loan so I can't see how they could be accused of wrong doing if that is whats happened. Isn't this how NTFC are funding their new stand?
Is that allowed for the council to receive full payment of a loan and then lend it straight back to the people that just paid it off?
Councils lend to businesses to encourage growth or regeneration etc. It is never 100% and is at a commercial rate
The loan to ACL does not meet either of those criteria
It was a loan to a private property investment company at preferential rates and I think they have just written off £1m to benefit a Hedge Fund
Councils lend to businesses to encourage growth or regeneration etc. It is never 100% and is at a commercial rate
The loan to ACL does not meet either of those criteria
It was a loan to a private property investment company at preferential rates and I think they have just written off £1m to benefit a Hedge Fund
Guesswork ?
I thought the JR concluded everything was above board?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?