skyblueeyesrevisited
Well-Known Member
Richardson probably signed it on his behalf
Richardson probably signed it on his behalfReeves did say he hadn't signed one...
Should the "club" (or if it paid, Sisu) be pissed off as at one stage, they were paying sums of money to get games on (and keep ACL going!?).
It has come from somewhere.i would assume that the exclusivity bidder has put some money up fron(none returnable) to keep the business running whilst due diligence is carried out?
The administrator can only work with funds that ACL has.If there were multiple, how does it work with exclusively? Can somebody offer less but with exclusive payments than somebody offering more but with out them?
That would have been a good question.
Think he knew what he was doing, he just wants to get noticed, never a credible buyer, Dale Evans all over again
You'll have to narrow down the enemy one, they're all spottyTom Grennan and the spotty one from The Enemy.
the Columbian Cartel, but most likely some scruff from Tile Hill.....who are his backers exactly?
I don't think John Dawkins is a Jo Dhinsa type character. He is fairly well known around these parts and the music business, and he says he has investors behind him. I'm sure he's acting in good faith.
But Mike Ashley knows exactly what he's doing, he knows every trick in the book. There's a reason he's the preferred bidder.
Well if it was MA then fair play to him, we have 9 points in the bag.i would assume that the exclusivity bidder has put some money up fron(none returnable) to keep the business running whilst due diligence is carried out?
Money was put in for the pitch to be repaired, not sure what Joy could do about that other than picket the entrance to the stadiumJust a random thought, but was Boddy/CCFC making it clear they wanted games on and pushing for a quick resolution partly to blame for it not going to liquidation so Sisu could bid?
If Joy wanted it in admin why not let it fail and fuck off to Walsall or wherever while it’s resolved? Are they so hands off that this wouldn’t have come up?
Whilst ever they are tenants and paying on time they would under normal circumstances have certain protections.Just a random thought, but was Boddy/CCFC making it clear they wanted games on and pushing for a quick resolution partly to blame for it not going to liquidation so Sisu could bid?
If Joy wanted it in admin why not let it fail and fuck off to Walsall or wherever while it’s resolved? Are they so hands off that this wouldn’t have come up?
people are talking about a need to put bids in before a deadline, did that actually happen? I don't remember any reports there was a deadline for bids after which a preferred bidder would be given an exclusivity period.
quite tricky to ensure your bid is in by a deadline if you don't know there is a deadline.
are we no longer looking at a pre-pack admin? wouldn't that require the administrator to work to ensure they have maximised the return for creditors? we all knew Dawkins was working on a bid, we might not have believed it but we knew it was happening, is it not reasonable to expect whoever is handling this process to have made contact with him?
Guess you could also make the same argument with SISU. If you were selling a stadium that was home to a football club and looking to ensure you got the best price would you not make a call to the owners of the anchor tenant? from a bondholders perspective the process seems flawed.
people are talking about a need to put bids in before a deadline, did that actually happen? I don't remember any reports there was a deadline for bids after which a preferred bidder would be given an exclusivity period.
quite tricky to ensure your bid is in by a deadline if you don't know there is a deadline.
are we no longer looking at a pre-pack admin? wouldn't that require the administrator to work to ensure they have maximised the return for creditors? we all knew Dawkins was working on a bid, we might not have believed it but we knew it was happening, is it not reasonable to expect whoever is handling this process to have made contact with him?
Guess you could also make the same argument with SISU. If you were selling a stadium that was home to a football club and looking to ensure you got the best price would you not make a call to the owners of the anchor tenant? from a bondholders perspective the process seems flawed.
Not exactly BBC impartiality Phil but there you go
the notice of appointment and you’d Immediately file an offer
No they wouldn’t ring round people on Twitter or whatever. They’d expect a bid to be put in. We knew what the deadline was because everyone was running around trying to make sure ACL stayed alive by then.
The Ashley and NEC bids came out midway through October:Ex-Newcastle owner Mike Ashley held talks with Wasps about takeover
Plenty of time to put a bid in.
The notice was to apply for Admistration and the Appointment is to be discussed this week.
Until then DAR and Board are determining everything.
The notice was to apply for Admistration and the Appointment is to be discussed this week.
Until then DAR and Board are determining everything.
I don't think they are.... their overlords from the last 8 or so years are pulling all the strings!Until then DAR and Board are determining everything.
It’s different levels.I don't think John Dawkins is a Jo Dhinsa type character. He is fairly well known around these parts and the music business, and he says he has investors behind him. I'm sure he's acting in good faith.
But Mike Ashley knows exactly what he's doing, he knows every trick in the book. There's a reason he's the preferred bidder.
Love it.Matons just been booed walking on stage at the Christmas lights switch on in town
I don't think they are.... their overlords from the last 8 or so years are pulling all the strings!
https://giphy.com/LYDNZAzOqrez6Matons just been booed walking on stage at the Christmas lights switch on in town
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?