Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Wasps going into admin & the impact on CCFC (9 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Alkhen
  • Start date Sep 21, 2022
Forums New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 296
  • 297
  • 298
  • 299
  • 300
  • …
  • 376
Next
First Prev 298 of 376 Next Last

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,396
Anyway, I’m enjoying Grendel’s increasingly bizarre posts.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and Grendel
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,397
The Philosopher said:
Of course:

Name one club owner that wouldn’t?

It’s like saying who wouldn’t want a brand new car for a tenner?

The point?
Click to expand...
If you're from a school of philosophy above that of Katie Price, I'm sure you can work out the point.
 
Reactions: Grendel
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,398
The Philosopher said:
Of course:

Name one club owner that wouldn’t?

It’s like saying who wouldn’t want a brand new car for a tenner?

The point?
Click to expand...
The point being they’re not generally bothered about what league we’re in. They’ll put in minimal funding to ensure they don’t lose money.

PL money would be nice, but they’re not willing to put the investment to get there
 
Reactions: MusicDating and clint van damme

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,399
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Fucking hell nobody said they want relegation. the championship is a step too far for them. The Costs involved give them headaches.

they don’t give a shit what league we’re in as long as the costs are down

they operate a model which is easier in league one/two - The championship requires a lot more investment - that they’re not willing to provide.
Click to expand...
Why get angry?

I’m sure we all know that SISU want to get promoted on minimal budget.

We saw in Champ return Season 1 that by Xmas whilst we were struggling SISU allowed the getting in of players like Matty James (not cheap) to steady the ship.

I’ve not and likely never will say that SISU are good owners but some of the things said implying that they’d rather be in L1 because the model works better is frankly bonkers.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,400
The Philosopher said:
Clueless,

They’ve underwritten losses.

It’s like saying that using your credit card isn’t spending money.

We’d all like them to have spent more, but they haven’t.

Clueless.
Click to expand...

The whole of the period from the promotion year to before the last set of accounts the losses have been funded by profit on player sales

The net investment is about £100 grand
 
Reactions: The Philosopher
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,401
hill83 said:
3 offside goals as well wasn’t it. Beautiful.
Click to expand...

Max MOTM
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,402
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
The point being they’re not generally bothered about what league we’re in. They’ll put in minimal funding to ensure they don’t lose money.

PL money would be nice, but they’re not willing to put the investment to get there
Click to expand...
They’re not going to do a Derby but by the same token I’m sure that if we are within touching distance they’ll throw in some incentives and support.

Throw money around like drunken sailors? They did that. Didn’t work. They can’t and probably won’t do so again
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,403
The Philosopher said:
Why get angry?

I’m sure we all know that SISU want to get promoted on minimal budget.

We saw in Champ return Season 1 that by Xmas whilst we were struggling SISU allowed the getting in of players like Matty James (not cheap) to steady the ship.

I’ve not and likely never will say that SISU are good owners but some of the things said implying that they’d rather be in L1 because the model works better is frankly bonkers.
Click to expand...
I think you have a problem reading words and understanding them.
 
Reactions: MusicDating and Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,404
The Philosopher said:
Why get angry?

I’m sure we all know that SISU want to get promoted on minimal budget.

We saw in Champ return Season 1 that by Xmas whilst we were struggling SISU allowed the getting in of players like Matty James (not cheap) to steady the ship.

I’ve not and likely never will say that SISU are good owners but some of the things said implying that they’d rather be in L1 because the model works better is frankly bonkers.
Click to expand...

In the first championship season they had a relatively low wage structure and had cash flow funding via the EFL loan and transfer sales netting £1.7 million
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,405
The Philosopher said:
The league is irrelevant?

They want PL money - anyone that thinks they don’t has no grasp of reality.

L1 is further away from the PL

I’ll say it again:

Clueless
Click to expand...

Ofcourse they want PL money, but they want to fluke it, they don't actually want to support the manager to facilitate it.
If they did they'd have allowed Robins to have bought in more additions in January when we were in around the play offsbutclearly being hampered having a paper thin squad.
 
Reactions: shmmeee and CCFCSteve

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,406
Grendel said:
they couldn’t give a fuck what League that we are in
Click to expand...
If they didn't care why do we have a decent manager and why did they bring him back after he left? They have sacked a few poor managers in their time with us.
 
Reactions: Hiraeth, The Philosopher and DannyThomas_1981
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,407
The Philosopher said:
Why get angry?

I’m sure we all know that SISU want to get promoted on minimal budget.

We saw in Champ return Season 1 that by Xmas whilst we were struggling SISU allowed the getting in of players like Matty James (not cheap) to steady the ship.

I’ve not and likely never will say that SISU are good owners but some of the things said implying that they’d rather be in L1 because the model works better is frankly bonkers.
Click to expand...
You’re under the assumption they’re football fans. They look at CCFC as a business that’s losing x amount, since promotion that loss/expenditure has risen 10x.

it’s a numbers only thing. There is no ambition to run a football club.

As earlier on in the thread - if Sepalla gets offered what she’s put in, which is around 20m she’ll be gone. She was sold a pup by ranson. She never had any intention of becoming as involved as she is
 
Reactions: MusicDating
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,408
The Philosopher said:
They’re not going to do a Derby but by the same token I’m sure that if we are within touching distance they’ll throw in some incentives and support.

Throw money around like drunken sailors? They did that. Didn’t work. They can’t and probably won’t do so again
Click to expand...
They had that chance last year and didn’t
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,409
Timmy Fisher and The Philosopher’s Stoned
 
Reactions: MAFF, RegTheDonk, WestEndAgro and 5 others
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,410
God help us when we get to the actual in-depth stuff if this introductory element of CCFC finances causes such confusion...
 
Reactions: MAFF and Grendel

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,411
Grendel said:
The whole of the period from the promotion year to before the last set of accounts the losses have been funded by profit on player sales

The net investment is about £100 grand
Click to expand...
What ?

So you’ve picked a period of time - that they invested either by transfer or academy before that doesn’t count?

SISU have invested £100k

Utterly clueless

please don’t stop


 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,412
clint van damme said:
Ofcourse they want PL money, but they want to fluke it, they don't actually want to support the manager to facilitate it.
If they did they'd have allowed Robins to have bought in more additions in January when we were in around the play offsbutclearly being hampered having a paper thin squad.
Click to expand...

That was their time to gamble if ever there was one. When they didn’t it suggested to me they might be ready to move on if someone puts a sensible deal on the table (£Xm upfront plus upside on promotion and/or big player sales)
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,413
clint van damme said:
Ofcourse they want PL money, but they want to fluke it, they don't actually want to support the manager to facilitate it.
If they did they'd have allowed Robins to have bought in more additions in January when we were in around the play offsbutclearly being hampered having a paper thin squad.
Click to expand...
They kept the squad together.

Maybe they had the attitude of “you’ve had £12k / week for Waghorn - what do you want now?”

I agree we’d all love a huge spending spree, but at what cost?
 
Reactions: Grendel and shmmeee
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,414
Interesting seeing how Fisher behaves and speaks in the 'interview'

 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,415
CCFCSteve said:
That was their time to gamble if ever there was one. When they didn’t it suggested to me they might be ready to move on if someone puts a sensible deal on the table (£Xm upfront plus upside on promotion and/or big player sales)
Click to expand...
tbf I'd have seen it as very irresponsible to gamble in that January. Building incrementally is fine. That being said, we then messed that up by reducing the level of squad in the close season, anyway!
 
Reactions: shmmeee
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,416
The Philosopher said:
They kept the squad together.

Maybe they had the attitude of “you’ve had £12k / week for Waghorn - what do you want now?”

I agree we’d all love a huge spending spree, but at what cost?
Click to expand...
You literally just said “if we are within touching distance they’ll throw in some incentives and support.”
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,417
CCFCSteve said:
That was their time to gamble if ever there was one. When they didn’t it suggested to me they might be ready to move on if someone puts a sensible deal on the table (£Xm upfront plus upside on promotion and/or big player sales)
Click to expand...

Well they supported Robins more in the previous January with Vik, James etc, (I've said many times I think James was a huge factor in us getting out of trouble), so maybe you're right.
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981 and The Philosopher

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,418
The Philosopher said:
What ?

So you’ve picked a period of time - that they invested either by transfer or academy before that doesn’t count?

SISU have invested £100k

Utterly clueless

please don’t stop


Click to expand...

Transfer sales aren’t investments - if you take transfer profit it’s funded operational losses. That’s not funding

The loans in have been paid back and they extracted nearly £2 million in 2019 for investor returns

Net money in is exactly what I’ve said

Total investment OSB estimates at £32 m most of which stopped in 2012 - the capital and interest residing in the club at the last accounts stands at £20 million
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,419
Deleted member 5849 said:
tbf I'd have seen it as very irresponsible to gamble in that January. Building incrementally is fine. That being said, we then messed that up by reducing the level of squad in the close season, anyway!
Click to expand...

But we could have used the loan market as we did the previous January so not giving us any financial commitments beyond the end of the season.
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,420
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
You’re under the assumption they’re football fans. They look at CCFC as a business that’s losing x amount, since promotion that loss/expenditure has risen 10x.

it’s a numbers only thing. There is no ambition to run a football club.

As earlier on in the thread - if Sepalla gets offered what she’s put in, which is around 20m she’ll be gone. She was sold a pup by ranson. She never had any intention of becoming as involved as she is
Click to expand...
Yes, I agree.

Sold a pup, Ranson, didn’t want to run a club.

100% right.

As I’ve said, whatever they’ve put in (£20m, 30,40 whatever), because of the way they’ve funded / borrowed stands them at more, so it’ll be difficult to accept a low bid.

That they want us relegated?

No.

A club with a chance of PL promotion has a wider selection of buyers than one that is in the PL (too expensive) or L1 (too far to go to get serious reward)
 
Reactions: Hiraeth and DannyThomas_1981
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,421
clint van damme said:
But we could have used the loan market as we did the previous January so not giving us any financial commitments beyond the end of the season.
Click to expand...
Loans always a risk, especially wrt team spirit, and they can come with fat wages too. Plus we've seen with Matt Jansen and co how a loan can really lift a team(!)

Plus a loanee playing stops a member of our squad gaining some more experience and developing further. See, for example, Eccles, who'd have undoubtedly played more end of last season without injury issues.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,422
The Philosopher said:
They kept the squad together.

Maybe they had the attitude of “you’ve had £12k / week for Waghorn - what do you want now?”

I agree we’d all love a huge spending spree, but at what cost?
Click to expand...

'They' told Boddy that they refused to provide any extra short term funding to help our August cashflow problems. That resulted in him punting Hyam on the cheap to Blackburn because otherwise we simply wouldn't have been able to pay wages.

My arse do they care about the footballing side of things-they couldn't give a flying fuck
 
Reactions: thekidfromstrettoncamp, KAB, Colin Steins Smile and 3 others

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,423
The Philosopher said:
They kept the squad together.

Maybe they had the attitude of “you’ve had £12k / week for Waghorn - what do you want now?”

I agree we’d all love a huge spending spree, but at what cost?
Click to expand...

As many of us said last winter, we weren't advocating spanking 10 million but we could have used the loan market. The drop off was wholly predictable, the squad looked knackered and we had a bench with players on that Robins clearly would only use as a last resort.
 
Reactions: TwistAndShoutCCFC1987, skyblueheaven and Brighton Sky Blue

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,424
For me the last two windows have been markedly different from the ones before. All we needed was Jan/Summer windows like the last few years: a couple of loans in Jan, slowly improving the quality of the squad in the summer. Neither happened.
 
Reactions: The Penguin, KAB and skybluepm2
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,425
The Philosopher said:
Yes, I agree.

Sold a pup, Ranson, didn’t want to run a club.

100% right.

As I’ve said, whatever they’ve put in (£20m, 30,40 whatever), because of the way they’ve funded / borrowed stands them at more, so it’ll be difficult to accept a low bid.

That they want us relegated?

No.

A club with a chance of PL promotion has a wider selection of buyers than one that is in the PL (too expensive) or L1 (too far to go to get serious reward)
Click to expand...
Again - you’re assuming they’re football people. They are not.

and again - nobody has said they want a relegation - what they want is lower costs…if that means relegation -they ain’t bothered.

if they Do get relegated they’ll cut the costs and bubble along until they decide to close or an idiot takes a punt
 
Reactions: skyblueheaven and clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,426
Deleted member 5849 said:
Loans always a risk, especially wrt team spirit, and they can come with fat wages too. Plus we've seen with Matt Jansen and co how a loan can really lift a team(!)

Plus a loanee playing stops a member of our squad gaining some more experience and developing further. See, for example, Eccles, who'd have undoubtedly played more end of last season without injury issues.
Click to expand...

But the previous January we used the loan market to great affect.
If they really wanted to help Robins get to the EPL then surely they could have gone down that route again?

And in general, our loans have been fairly decent since Robins came back where as in the days of Jansen et al they were pretty much all shit!
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,427
clint van damme said:
But the previous January we used the loan market to great affect.
If they really wanted to help Robins get to the EPL then surely they could have gone down that route again?

And in general, our loans have been fairly decent since Robins came back where as in the days of Jansen et al they were pretty much all shit!
Click to expand...
*cough* Maguire-Drew, *cough* Josh Barrett*
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,428
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
*cough* Maguire-Drew, *cough* Josh Barrett*
Click to expand...
Who could forget David Meyler lighting up our team!
 
Reactions: Skybluedownunder, TwistAndShoutCCFC1987, Skyblueweeman and 1 other person

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,429
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Again - you’re assuming they’re football people. They are not.

and again - nobody has said they want a relegation - what they want is lower costs…if that means relegation -they ain’t bothered.

if they Do get relegated they’ll cut the costs and bubble along until they decide to close or an idiot takes a punt
Click to expand...
They aren’t football people, never said they were.

They aren’t even business people, they are hedge fund managers.

With relegation comes lower income. Costs will fall but not at the same rate. Think how PL clubs need parachute payments to honour player contracts. We’d no doubt have similar problems albeit at lower numbers.

What would hurt is the value attributed to league status and minimum revenues.

Have a think.

You may even agree. You might not admit it, but:

SISU would be in a world of pain with relegation. To say that it would be better or at least equal is madness.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • #10,430
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
*cough* Maguire-Drew, *cough* Josh Barrett*
Click to expand...

I did say in general!
 
Reactions: HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 296
  • 297
  • 298
  • 299
  • 300
  • …
  • 376
Next
First Prev 298 of 376 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?