Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Wasps finances 2016 (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter oldskyblue58
  • Start date Nov 1, 2016
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #1
For those interested this is the link to the stock exchange summary of the Wasps Holdings 2016 financials

http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/WAS1/13018904.html

There is also a link to the full accounts here

http://www.wasps.co.uk/docs/default-source/Bonds/wasps-financial-results-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=4
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #2
oldskyblue58 said:
For those interested this is the link to the stock exchange summary of the Wasps Holdings 2016 financials

http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/WAS1/13018904.html

There is also a link to the full accounts here

http://www.wasps.co.uk/docs/default-source/Bonds/wasps-financial-results-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=4
Click to expand...

Is it me, or are they underwhelming?

Interesting to see the hype about the promotion of World Class Acts such as the MTV Crashes event, shortly followed by the admission that this event fell below expectation thus increasing operating costs.
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #3
Loss doesn't seem to be too worrying.

'A retained loss should be of concern to an investor if a company has been in business for a long period of time, since it indicates that the entity has struggled to find a consistent strategy for earning a profit. However, this is not necessarily the case for a start up company, which is expected to incur losses as it rolls out its initial products and services and attempts to gain market share. The latter situation may make particular sense if the intent is to build a product or customer base and then sell the company based on the prospects of the business, rather than its proven profitability.'
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #4
Losses up from £2.4m to £3.8m before additional one off exceptional items.

Group loss of £5.3m

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Last edited: Nov 1, 2016

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #5
Not huge losses on that turnover though, are they?

Do they know something we don't?

· Railway station open and operating for match days
Click to expand...
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #6
Increase in average gate from 11k to 16k but ticket income only up 19%
 
Reactions: Captain Dart and Astute

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #7
fernandopartridge said:
Not huge losses on that turnover though, are they?
Click to expand...

Still losses though. What a shame
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, torchomatic, skybluegnome and 1 other person
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #8
oldfiver said:
They were supposed to have a revaluation of the Arena this year but have relied on a Management valuation instead. It happens to be the same as last year!

Moonstone Holdings Debt of £9m seems to have been replaced by Richardson?
Click to expand...
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #9
£17.5m in wages over 216 employees (57 players) at an average of £80.6k

3 directors renumeration £905k,

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #10
stupot07 said:
£17.5m in wages over 216 employees (57 players) at an average of £80.6k

3 directors renumeration £905k,

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Losing money and paying management fees? Who would have thought it!
 
Reactions: Captain Dart, Astute and martcov

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #11
oldfiver said:
Losing money and paying management fees? Who would have thought it!
Click to expand...
£14.5m in admin fees, not sure what thats about.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #12
£2.3m interest on the retail bond - not sure if that's full year or not, think it was only issued about a year ago wasn't it?
 

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #13
New Xtragrass pitch was installed during the summer of 2015, benefitting Coventry City Football Club and attracting the Ricoh's first England Football U21 game

well that's just not true...............

i note the full accounts say attracting the group's first enlgand u21 game, so i'll let them off!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #14
(This isn't a complaint) but very little mention of CCFC in the accounts, wonder if next year would mention any potential impact of no long term agreement with CCFC. It's a loss of 23 event days a year out of 139 (though I am not quite sure what the methodology is for calculating event days).
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #15
fernandopartridge said:
£2.3m interest on the retail bond - not sure if that's full year or not, think it was only issued about a year ago wasn't it?
Click to expand...

Six month payment due next on 11th November
 
Reactions: Astute and fernandopartridge
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #16
fernandopartridge said:
(This isn't a complaint) but very little mention of CCFC in the accounts, wonder if next year would mention any potential impact of no long term agreement with CCFC. It's a loss of 23 event days a year out of 139 (though I am not quite sure what the methodology is for calculating event days).
Click to expand...

The Valuation is future income based and your note would have to be considered in a longer term view - as would the lack of a long agreement for naming rights
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #17
And people think that wasps will want to buy a football club who needs significant finance in order to get up and stay up in the championship.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #18
stupot07 said:
And people think that wasps will want to buy a football club who needs significant finance in order to get up and stay up in the championship.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It makes perfect sense!
 
Reactions: Captain Dart and stupot07
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #19
Moff said:
Still losses though. What a shame
Click to expand...

If I'm honest I'd fully expect them to run at a loss for this set of accounts, maybe one or two more.

The bigger question is whether they can turn that around with their strategy, in time.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Dal, torchomatic, Captain Dart and 2 others

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #20
oldfiver said:
The Valuation is future income based and your note would have to be considered in a longer term view - as would the lack of a long agreement for naming rights
Click to expand...

Is the naming rights that much of an issue? Or was it mentioned in the bond prospectus?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #21
fernandopartridge said:
Is the naming rights that much of an issue? Or was it mentioned in the bond prospectus?
Click to expand...

According to Italia JLR are champing at the bit and it's only ccfc and the legal dispute that's preventing them signing.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #22
Deleted member 5849 said:
If I'm honest I'd fully expect them to run at a loss for this set of accounts, maybe one or two more.

The bigger question is whether they can turn that around with their strategy, in time.
Click to expand...
Can't pretend I understand but as Stu mentioned £14.5M admin fees?
Did it say sports turnover under £11M, that's lower than Gloucester turned over 3-4 years back.
Obviously naming rights is an issue and possibly is one of the factors between us.
They get an extra £1.2M from the RFU as of next season.
They only have £1.2M left from the bond issue to draw down.
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #23
Grendel said:
According to Italia JLR are champing at the bit and it's only ccfc and the legal dispute that's preventing them signing.
Click to expand...

Will they get Local Authority and Development Grant Funding for this as they seem to get it for everything else?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #24
Interestingly my auditor friend's comment: "Bottom line is these aren't the healthiest set of accounts. That's a hefty loss as a percentage of turnover, and it's not like there are any big exceptional items in there this year. They've also massively drawn down on their cash reserves. I can't see any huge creditors that immediately suggest that this is a short term effect "

(Bear in mind his comment about CCFC's were that the club's fucked, you're all fucked, why the fuck is the club still running?!? You can see he doesn't have a bias )
 
Reactions: Sick Boy, torchomatic, Captain Dart and 1 other person
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #25
Food and drink expenses of £5.6mil seems *enormous*
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #26
Deleted member 5849 said:
Food and drink expenses of £5.6mil seems *enormous*
Click to expand...
*




*This is a joke, before anybody cries!
 
Reactions: Sick Boy, torchomatic, Captain Dart and 6 others
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #27
In case of interest, Leicester Tigers results for comparison:

http://www.leicestertigers.com/images/content/photos/Final_2016_Accounts_low_res_for_web.pdf
 
Reactions: We'll_live_and_die
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #28
Deleted member 5849 said:
Food and drink expenses of £5.6mil seems *enormous*
Click to expand...
Is that indicative of the Compass deal?
If so wasn't there a rumour on here that they'd bought a larger stake in IEC?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #29
wingy said:
Is that indicative of the Compass deal?
If so wasn't there a rumour on here that they'd bought a larger stake in IEC?
Click to expand...
The year before it was nearly £4mil.

However much it costs to feed Haskell on boat trips?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #30
On face value doesn't seem great to me and certainly would lend weight to the argument that our fans should stay away from Wasps games to reduce their income. Of course I'm not an accountant, I might ask mine to take a look and see what he thinks.

Given that they are claiming each individual area is performing well, and that occupancy of the various facilities is high, where are they going to make up the shortfall on an annual basis?
 
Reactions: torchomatic

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #31
Deleted member 5849 said:
If I'm honest I'd fully expect them to run at a loss for this set of accounts, maybe one or two more.

The bigger question is whether they can turn that around with their strategy, in time.
Click to expand...

Yep, that's just about how I'd read it too. If I had one concern, it would be that I think that I don't see any really big areas of (edit) future growth on the pitch or in terms of attendance - in essence I think we're close to peak Wasps in that sense. They're pretty shrewd off the pitch in all fairness, but servicing that level of debt would worry me. If it goes wrong with that level of gearing, I fancy it might go wrong in a big way.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, Moff and Astute
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #32
100000 a year at the moment and a bit of F&B from CCFC doesn't seem to be a game changer. They cannot increase our rent too much, there isn't a great deal to take from CCFC. If we go, they won't notice it in relation to turnover either. One decent concert could cover everything we contribute over a whole season and more.
 
Reactions: Astute

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #33
martcov said:
One decent concert could cover everything we contribute over a whole season and more.
Click to expand...
Equally one underperforming event could cause issues. When we talk about losing our income we shouldn't just assume they can grab another event and it will automatically be successful.
 
Reactions: torchomatic and duffer
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #34
chiefdave said:
Equally one underperforming event could cause issues. When we talk about losing our income we shouldn't just assume they can grab another event and it will automatically be successful.
Click to expand...

The issues wouldn't be solved by a hundred grand from us. I see our value more as leverage for the naming rights ( we are/ could be very high profile ) and keeping CCC and the Coventry public ( voters ) on board.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #35
Wasps RFC turnover is not dissimilar to that of CCFC's as a Championship club at the Ricoh, slightly better presumably due to higher ticket prices
 
Reactions: stupot07, Astute and wingy
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?