Bunged out by who ?
Are you saying the Ricoh put a proposal to LR?
Are you saying it was going to be LR and now it's not?
It was considered then and something changed ?
We could both be right.
Er no I’m saying wasps wanted a high profile company but were deluded and shown the door - by several companies I believe.
Wasps will do what they always do in the end - agree a “multi million pound” deal with a company - you’ll be all over it - but in reality the terms conditions and small print mean it costs the sponsor next to nothing
Yeah, interesting in its own way. Even if a small figure, I expected them to get a new sponsor so they could claim it was a big deal, and 'showcase' their commercial pulling ability.They've been incredibly quiet about the 'deal' with RICOH, not even a 'five figure' sponsorship deal.
Er no I’m saying wasps wanted a high profile company but were deluded and shown the door - by several companies I believe.
Wasps will do what they always do in the end - agree a “multi million pound” deal with a company - you’ll be all over it - but in reality the terms conditions and small print mean it costs the sponsor next to nothing
I can assure any disgusting wasps supporter JLR will not be sponsoring the Ricoh and the shirt sponsorship may also be in doubt.What evidence do you want? Do you have any idea how companies work regarding sponsorship? Do you honestly think a multi national company like JLR will put on hold a very minor sponsorship deal with a minority sport for years and years until some court action is resolved?
Really it’s embarrassing. As for evidence - the evidence is that you stated it would be a done deal in 2015 (there was court action then) and 3 years later it hasn’t
I’m hardly going to be able to colonially reveal minutes of meetings am I? Fact is in 2015 I said it had been dimissed and you said it’s imminent.
Let’s let the audience decide whose in the know and who hasn’t got a fucking clue.
More good news for our landlords
Billy Ocean and Five Star concert at the Ricoh CANCELLED
More good news for our landlords
Billy Ocean and Five Star concert at the Ricoh CANCELLED
All rather odd - says will be rescheduled at another venue?
Would expect so. The worry for Wasps must be that Billy Ocean is clearly shifting tickets generally as he's having extra dates added to his tour due to demand. If they aren't shifting at one particular venue it would indicate the problem lies with the venue. And of course this is the second gig there recently to be cancelled.Maybe a smaller one where they can sell enough tickets easier
Would expect so. The worry for Wasps must be that Billy Ocean is clearly shifting tickets generally as he's having extra dates added to his tour due to demand. If they aren't shifting at one particular venue it would indicate the problem lies with the venue. And of course this is the second gig there recently to be cancelled.
I see they are now offering zebra finance for season tickets and spreading over 12 months. The APR is 17.8% is ours that high on finance?
I have both .....I see they are now offering zebra finance for season tickets and spreading over 12 months. The APR is 17.8% is ours that high on finance?
The ticket prices were exorbitant. No surprise this has been cancelled.More good news for our landlords
Billy Ocean and Five Star concert at the Ricoh CANCELLED
We will never know what went on exactly but there was clearly no working relationship remaining between PWC and Wasps. Not sure you see such audit reports and filings that often, and that seriously taints Wasps holdings. That in itself makes me wonder what really went on between the two sides Wasps and PWC
I know I work with smaller audit clients but quite how audit fees charged by PWC increased by a factor of nearly 7 to over £200k surprises me even with the extra work they had to do. Wasps might have large numbers but are there that many transactions, and isn't a lot (even all) held electronically so the actual man power to the audit is it that high? The transaction they found must have been material to the audit it was £1.1m, it is not as if they stumbled across it to check by luck I would think they had to check it
I get the feeling there is more to this but I have nothing to add to that, its just a gut feeling. Seems PWC are covering their position any way they can however they have acted quite properly in terms of resignation . I think both sides will feel well rid of each other. But not my problem anyway
Still find it Incredulous that his cash injection was made late ..Well indeed, particularly considering that the large audit firms in the UK have often been seen to be rather leant on by companies (the Financial Crisis, Carillion etc). It must be bad for even them not to sign it off!
Still find it Incredulous that his cash injection was made late ..
Was always likely ,required, necessary .
Really find it hard to conclude it was an accident oversight,incompitent?
Unless it was pure panic I would be looking at their motivation If in some un-apparent bizarre way there is some advantage in the overall picture .The auditors seemed to think it was done on purpose as evidence was falsified. That seems a fair bit away from filing something under the wrong code.
Unless it was pure panic I would be looking at their motivation If in some un-apparent bizarre way there is some advantage in the overall picture .
Clearly there doesn't appear to be one at surface level ,some Scam?
YeahWasn't it to trick the bold holders and meet the needs of it? If I remember it was something like that.
Wasn't just the timing was it? Wasn't it that the owner putting in money didn't count towards income as far as the bond conditions were concerned. That's one of the things they voted on in that meeting I think, to change the conditions of the bond.Yeah
Why not just put it in on time though?
Is there a point with enough shit hit the fan to make the bonds attractive to buy out as opposed pay out years of interest, then final £35 M?
Unlikely.
IDK Dave but hadn't he done that a couple of times before?Wasn't just the timing was it? Wasn't it that the owner putting in money didn't count towards income as far as the bond conditions were concerned. That's one of the things they voted on in that meeting I think, to change the conditions of the bond.
HahahahaI wonder if they are paying for the long lease for the land?
I wonder if they are paying for the long lease for the land?
Interesting that they're applying to extend the lease first on this occasion. Wasps will not operate the hotel, presumably will be leasing it on to a hotel operator or other intermediary.
How will the council calculate how much the lease is worth?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?