fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
I let contracts for a living, not a chance they'd pass a financial health assessment
I know from talking to our accounts dept that when they’re doing credit checks on new customers if they check their accounts on companies house and the books are loaded with intangible assets it’s rare that they get account facilities. Sounds very similar.
According a Wasps fan, they are underplaying the accounts because if they reported a profitable operation it would strengthen SISU's case.
It's like listening to the shit Italia comes up with.
Brilliant news for SISU if true. Italia claimed yesterday the accounts were all guesswork and now we have someone claiming they've deliberately falsified the accounts to assist in a court case.According a Wasps fan, they are underplaying the accounts because if they reported a profitable operation it would strengthen SISU's case.
Or like the Les Reid fan club on here ?
Where's that then? Read the thread, there were comments on here before Les Reid had probably even seen the accounts let alone written an article.
That's another standard line from the Wasps website as well, deflect it to Les Reid making it up and everybody believing it.
He writes your script and you run with it. Not just this thread.
As I said the only people worrying about it are on here.
I could say Sisu are deflecting you from the real problem and you have fell into the trap.
The Wasps business is in its early days and yes it's probably not happening as quick as expected for some like institutional bond holders etc but it's moving in the right direction be it slowly.
I like their threads comment saying that they delayed the accounts to get this forum in meltdown.
He writes your script and you run with it. Not just this thread.
As I said the only people worrying about it are on here.
I could say Sisu are deflecting you from the real problem and you have fell into the trap.
The Wasps business is in its early days and yes it's probably not happening as quick as expected for some like institutional bond holders etc but it's moving in the right direction be it slowly.
I like their threads comment saying that they delayed the accounts to get this forum in meltdown.
Not it’s not just on here though is it
Someone posted a link to an investor forum where people had concerns re bonds and had sold them.
The ricoh is classed as a tangible rather an intangible asset, is being recorded at fair value rather than at cost, which is perfectly allowed within accounting rules .
Intangible are things like goodwill, patents, development or software costs which are much harder to value. Goodwill is literally a value attached to a business when purchased for it basically having a good name which adds value, over an above its actual assets.
Which one is Les Reid ?
I only remember one poster on here with a sisu flag. Wonder who that was??Which one is Les Reid ?
I recognise Nick from the Sisu flag sticking out his arse.
... and at the time they were trying.I only remember one poster on here with a sisu flag. Wonder who that was??
Sisu is saving us!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Which one is Les Reid ?
I recognise Nick from the Sisu flag sticking out his arse.
Believe it or not, since the Northampton debacle I've moved on, rather than support Sisu there and later on in the courts.Again, what you miss is that you still are the most pro sisu person to post on here.
Who else has demanded everybody get behind SISU (not CCFC, SISU)?
Your awful attempt at pushing their line is just showing you up, I actually feel embarrassed for you.
You'll need to wait until 'the usual' have cleared the saliva off their screens.Anyone know what’s happening with the Wasp Bond price today? Anymore drops?
Brilliant news for SISU if true. Italia claimed yesterday the accounts were all guesswork and now we have someone claiming they've deliberately falsified the accounts to assist in a court case.
Where in that update did it state the auditors had identified Wasps had been supplying falsified information or detail concerns about the viability of the business or that the auditors were resigning?The same information was available in the trading update in December last year.
Why do you keep going on about les reid? The accounts had been discussed in this thread before he had done an article.Believe it or not, since the Northampton debacle I've moved on, rather than support Sisu there and later on in the courts.
I prefer to analyse and quote what Wasps have published rather than wax lyrical over Les Reid articles.
I take it as a positive that you feel embarrassed for me !!
The information and figures are the same it's just the interpretation that is the latest news.Where in that update did it state the auditors had identified Wasps had been supplying falsified information or detail concerns about the viability of the business or that the auditors were resigning?
I'm not going on about 'him', I'm saying 'you' (and others) are just running with his Sisu based news articles.Why do you keep going on about les reid? The accounts had been discussed in this thread before he had done an article.
It's very strange. Desperately trying to deflect it as him making it up, the wasps happy clappers might fall for that.
He's going on about Les Reid because he's trying to deflect from the appalling information coming from Wasps. It's probably the line the crisis management PR company has fed.Why do you keep going on about les reid? The accounts had been discussed in this thread before he had done an article.
It's very strange. Desperately trying to deflect it as him making it up, the wasps happy clappers might fall for that.
But it's not new news. The accounts information was known in December.He's going on about Les Reid because he's trying to deflect from the appalling information coming from Wasps. It's probably the line the crisis management PR company has fed.
Where is that happening?I'm not going on about 'him', I'm saying 'you' (and others) are just running with his Sisu based news articles.
The falsified evidence was known? Any links?But it's not new news. The accounts information was known in December.
Calm down.He writes your script and you run with it. Not just this thread.
As I said the only people worrying about it are on here.
I could say Sisu are deflecting you from the real problem and you have fell into the trap.
The Wasps business is in its early days and yes it's probably not happening as quick as expected for some like institutional bond holders etc but it's moving in the right direction be it slowly.
I like their threads comment saying that they delayed the accounts to get this forum in meltdown.
You'll need to read back if you forgot.Where is that happening?
So you can't back it up? But desperate to now just make things up to deflect isn't it?You'll need to read back if you forgot.
No I can't be bothered to go back through your posts which is slightly different.So you can't back it up? But desperate to now just make things up to deflect isn't it?
Again, never said that I said the accounts, keep up.The falsified evidence was known? Any links?
Again, never said that I said the accounts, keep up.
The accounts transaction which the independent accountants assess as falsified was known then.
Your source is ?
Please don't say Coventry Observer
No I can't be bothered to go back through your posts which is slightly different.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?