SydneySkyBlue
Member
According to Central News' Darryl Murphy, Coventry City have hald talks with Walsall FC regarding a three year ground-sharing arrangement.
Mr Murphy has tweeted: "To clarify, senior sources at Walsall FC have told me that they HAVE had talks with Coventry City about ground-sharing."
With regards to reports that had a deal had been agreed, Mr Murphy also tweeted: :'denied reports they've agreed a deal' - that part is true. At the moment - they haven't agreed a deal.
More worryingly was his tweets: "For a long time I doubted it - but at the moment it does seem more credible (and various people I'm speaking to agree)" and "FL do have to ratify - am told Sisu are working closely to keep them on side. FL want to make sure fixtures go ahead asap."
If this is true then I am appalled by both Walsall and The Football League. Morality and the importance of the football community are both being thrown out of the window in order to make a quick buck and avoid any hassle.
And why is it that (if true) Walsall would happily deal with these crooks and yet previous consortiums wouldn't when we were looking for a takeover?
I can only hope that common sense prevails or I fear for our game.
Mr Murphy has tweeted: "To clarify, senior sources at Walsall FC have told me that they HAVE had talks with Coventry City about ground-sharing."
With regards to reports that had a deal had been agreed, Mr Murphy also tweeted: :'denied reports they've agreed a deal' - that part is true. At the moment - they haven't agreed a deal.
More worryingly was his tweets: "For a long time I doubted it - but at the moment it does seem more credible (and various people I'm speaking to agree)" and "FL do have to ratify - am told Sisu are working closely to keep them on side. FL want to make sure fixtures go ahead asap."
If this is true then I am appalled by both Walsall and The Football League. Morality and the importance of the football community are both being thrown out of the window in order to make a quick buck and avoid any hassle.
And why is it that (if true) Walsall would happily deal with these crooks and yet previous consortiums wouldn't when we were looking for a takeover?
I can only hope that common sense prevails or I fear for our game.