If that's ALL they've said then they are talking to them, how far those talks have gone is anyone's guess.
Although the club have been trying to convince us our club is changing for the better after past disputes and our CEO deserves a lot of credit for that, past history tells us our owner would sell anyone down the river for a quid.
Just because is hasn't been agreed doesn't mean it's not being negotiated. My question is why would anyone want to go into a rental agreement with a company who doesn't pay their rent ?
Just because is hasn't been agreed doesn't mean it's not being negotiated. My question is why would anyone want to go into a rental agreement with a company who doesn't pay their rent ?
Just because is hasn't been agreed doesn't mean it's not being negotiated. My question is why would anyone want to go into a rental agreement with a company who doesn't pay their rent ?
Because our owner likes to think he is some hard nosed businessman, but he's a puppy compared to SISU. Problem is he is the sort that if you say that to him it will just make him even more determined to do it. To say he doesn't take criticism well is an understatement. In completely the wrong game if he's like that which explains why he can't even set foot in his own stadium when fans are around for fear of the reaction.
We still don't know where the share sits, but we do know Seppala has a legal argument for that already? I don't think the Football League have the backbone for a legal brawl so won't make such a decision.