SW himself of course. He can step in immediately and a wage is saved.Sssshh. You're not allowed to point that out.
Sssshh. You're not allowed to point that out.
Yeah let's keep him no matter how bad it gets. There's nobody else.
There's always someone else but as HH points out it doesn't mean that our car crash of a club is going to attract someone who's capable of improving our situation.
See if we can convince Gary Johnson to take on a massive challenge and to leave his beloved home
Give it 12 to 18 months...yeovil will probably be a bigger clubDidn't Johnson once say that Yeovil were a bigger club than Coventry. I wouldn't piss on him he were on fire.
Didn't Johnson once say that Yeovil were a bigger club than Coventry. I wouldn't piss on him he were on fire.
There's always someone else but as HH points out it doesn't mean that our car crash of a club is going to attract someone who's capable of improving our situation.
This mornings Article seems to debunk this topic .
Heavy reference to players fitting the Pressley ethos .
Could we attract someone who's capable of doing a better job than SP?
Could we attract someone who's capable of doing a better job than SP?
Could we attract someone who's capable of doing a better job than SP?
Are you being serious?
So you think we would struggle to find a manager that could get our team to get shots on target, make the right subs and at the right time, have a plan B, not keep playing a system that doesn't work or even get our team to play as good as a part time non league side?
I'd have sacked him months ago, just trying to get the reasoning from the 'who'd do any better' brigade!
Paul Tisdale at Exeter for one would do a better job the SP.
he is also used to working with no money and given a chance to work with a better squad of players would do a much better job than the "the special one".
he also plays attacking football, can you imagine going to games and watching our team attack ,playing attractive positive football and then having a shot on goal , crazy what a thought.
so there's a name for all the "who could do a batter job " brigade from a league below us as well, and his wage demands would not be excessive either.
i think the question is, who would be prepared to work with sisu ?
And why the flying fook would we want to do that, considering his beloved yeovil are rooted to the bottom of the league after crashing out of the championship.
Certainly no thanks.
Watch what happens after he wheels and deals in January.
He is the same man who got 15 misfits promoted from this division on one of the smallest budgets remember. We will soon have one if the smallest budgets.
And there ls the problem, they have all been sacked at one time or a other for not being good enough. May make a short term difference then we will be back to where we are now moaning for another new managerPlenty who are out of work and need money to feed their families.
And there ls the problem, they have all been sacked at one time or a other for not being good enough.
And there ls the problem, they have all been sacked at one time or a other for not being good enough. May make a short term difference then we will be back to where we are now moaning for another new manager
And there ls the problem, they have all been sacked at one time or a other for not being good enough. May make a short term difference then we will be back to where we are now moaning for another new manager
Makes no difference if they are good enough or not. They soon jump back onto the Management Merry-go-round. Football management must be the only job that rewards failure. And in most cases failure guarantees another job somewhere else.
However, I would like to see players start to take some responsibility for when clubs perform badly. They tend to get away with it. How about sacking a few of them, I'm sure they'd suddenly start playing a little better....
Watch what happens after he wheels and deals in January.
He is the same man who got 15 misfits promoted from this division on one of the smallest budgets remember. We will soon have one if the smallest budgets.
You could say its 50/50 but there are 3 different scenarios.
1) SP's replacement is better than SP
2) SP's replacement is no better than SP
3) SP's replacement is worse than SP
With SISU in charge what could possibly go wrong?
Or you could argue that number 3 is impossible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?