How can they get more than his release clause?Looks like a bidding war is starting with Vik. This is good news. Sporting actually want €90m. Athletico Madrid would be a a good choice for Vik.
After a year of speculation, the question of where Viktor Gyökeres, 26, will play next season is starting to get serious. The goal-scorer will apparently leave Sporting this summer and clubs are lining up.
Recently, the most talked about thing has been Arsenal and Juventus. Now another club has joined the hunt.
Record reports that Atlético Madrid have put Gyökeres at the top of their shopping list. Coach Diego Simeone has told the club management that he wants the Swedish top scorer. The price tag should not be a problem since this year's La Liga third-placed team has qualified for the Champions League and has signed a new lucrative deal with Nike.
Advertisement
The problem is apparently more the competition for the striker.
Record repeats the price tag that was frequently mentioned this spring: Gyökeres is for sale for around 65 million euros (just over 705 million kronor). However, Correio da Manhã reports that Sporting president Frederico Varandas hopes to get up to €90 million (around SEK 980 million) for the Swede, and according to the newspaper, Sporting rejected an initial bid from Arsenal of €70 million (SEK 760 million) this weekend.
In recent days, there have been reports that Napoli have set their sights on Gyökeres. Corriero dello Sport points out that it is more like a dream considering the price and "crazy competition".
At. Madrid chega-se à frente: Gyökeres é o alvo número um dos espanhóis
Colchoneros vão sofrer razia no ataque e colocam sueco no topo da lista para o reforçar. Milhões da Champions e da Nike são aliadoswww.record.pt
How can they get more than his release clause?
Once the release price has been triggered, he can leave for any club he wants to join who will pay that.Surely a release clause is just the minimum they need to accept?
If somebody bids more then of course they can take it?
Why would someone bid more though?Surely a release clause is just the minimum they need to accept?
If somebody bids more then of course they can take it?
Exactly. If it's a release clause, they have to accept, so offering more would be lunacy.Why would someone bid more though?
Why would you bid more than the release clause?Surely a release clause is just the minimum they need to accept?
If somebody bids more then of course they can take it?
No - once both teams meet the clause they can both negotiate with Gyokeres. It’s up to the player then.If there are 2 or more parties wanting Vik then they can outbid each other providing the bids are more than the release clause surely
Or am I a feckin dimwit
I’ve not really noticed any real interest from Liverpool, though obviously that doesn’t mean it isn’t there.Saw this on bet365 Liverpool favourites, no sign of us on there!!
Wouldn't be up to sporting it would be up to Gyökeres where he wentSo if Arsenal bid the release clause and to secure the player Atletico add to it by £1m and are willing to pay his required wages Sporting aren't going to say no to the extra dough though are they?
But if Vik opts for Arsenal he is free to do that, so there is no point Atletico offering Sporting more. At that point they need to offer Vik a package that is attractive to himSo if Arsenal bid the release clause and to secure the player Atletico add to it by £1m and are willing to pay his required wages Sporting aren't going to say no to the extra dough though are they?
I am a feckin dimwitBut if Vik opts for Arsenal he is free to do that, so there is no point Atletico offering Sporting more. At that point they need to offer Vik a package that is attractive to him
no you're notI am a feckin dimwit
Looks like a bidding war is starting with Vik. This is good news. Sporting actually want €90m. Athletico Madrid would be a a good choice for Vik.
After a year of speculation, the question of where Viktor Gyökeres, 26, will play next season is starting to get serious. The goal-scorer will apparently leave Sporting this summer and clubs are lining up.
Recently, the most talked about thing has been Arsenal and Juventus. Now another club has joined the hunt.
Record reports that Atlético Madrid have put Gyökeres at the top of their shopping list. Coach Diego Simeone has told the club management that he wants the Swedish top scorer. The price tag should not be a problem since this year's La Liga third-placed team has qualified for the Champions League and has signed a new lucrative deal with Nike.
Advertisement
The problem is apparently more the competition for the striker.
Record repeats the price tag that was frequently mentioned this spring: Gyökeres is for sale for around 65 million euros (just over 705 million kronor). However, Correio da Manhã reports that Sporting president Frederico Varandas hopes to get up to €90 million (around SEK 980 million) for the Swede, and according to the newspaper, Sporting rejected an initial bid from Arsenal of €70 million (SEK 760 million) this weekend.
In recent days, there have been reports that Napoli have set their sights on Gyökeres. Corriero dello Sport points out that it is more like a dream considering the price and "crazy competition".
At. Madrid chega-se à frente: Gyökeres é o alvo número um dos espanhóis
Colchoneros vão sofrer razia no ataque e colocam sueco no topo da lista para o reforçar. Milhões da Champions e da Nike são aliadoswww.record.pt
He isn’t going for more than the release clause so it’s nonsense journalism
Isn’t the release clause 90m euro?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No they would only need to meet the release clause.If there are 2 or more parties wanting Vik then they can outbid each other providing the bids are more than the release clause surely
Or am I a feckin dimwit
Didn’t Chelsea offer a team more than the release clause because they wanted to spread it over a million years, I read then Wolves and United couldn’t agree over the length of payments for Cunha as well.Why would someone bid more though?
No but Gyokerese can say stuff Atletico I'm going to Arsenal. So Atletico gained nothing by offereing higher than the release clauseSo if Arsenal bid the release clause and to secure the player Atletico add to it by £1m and are willing to pay his required wages Sporting aren't going to say no to the extra dough though are they?
Of course not, but they can't say no to the release clause, either.So if Arsenal bid the release clause and to secure the player Atletico add to it by £1m and are willing to pay his required wages Sporting aren't going to say no to the extra dough though are they?
You have to pay a release clause up in one go if you want to pay in installments it invalidates it (as far as I'm aware)Why would you bid more than the release clause?
I thought the release clause was higher but Sporting had lowered their expectations as a thanks for him not pushing for a move in January?
I remember his release clause being €100 million but there were happy to reduce it this summer, sounds like there asking for lower bids to start a bidding war
I reckon the arsenal "deal" was leaked to whip up interest.Viktor Gyökeres, the Swedish striker currently playing for Sporting CP, has a release clause set at €100 million (£83.6 million) in his contract . However, reports suggest that Sporting CP may be willing to negotiate a transfer fee closer to €70–85 million (£58.5–70.7 million), depending on the circumstances .
I reckon the arsenal "deal" was leaked to whip up interest.
THe longer into the window this goes, the more he goes for imo
Viktor Gyökeres, the Swedish striker currently playing for Sporting CP, has a release clause set at €100 million (£83.6 million) in his contract . However, reports suggest that Sporting CP may be willing to negotiate a transfer fee closer to €70–85 million (£58.5–70.7 million), depending on the circumstances .
Sometimes you've just got to get the deal doneIt'd be like asking how much a Snickers bar cost, being told £1, and then saying, 'cool, cheers, here's £1.50'.
Of course not, but they can't say no to the release clause, either.
It'd be like asking how much a Snickers bar cost, being told £1, and then saying, 'cool, cheers, here's £1.50'.
Apart from there's only one Snickers, and lots of people are trying to persuade it why they are the best person to eat it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?